wiki

Wiki

This LLM-Wiki is managed by the `wiki` skill created by Andreas F. Hoffmann from the `knowledge_management` plugin in [theafh AI-repo](https://github.com/theafh/ai-modules).

Unlike traditional RAG (which rediscovers knowledge from scratch per query), the wiki compiles knowledge once and keeps it current. Cross-references are already there. Contradictions have already been flagged. Synthesis reflects everything ingested.

Division of labor: the human curates sources and directs analysis. The agent summarizes, cross-references, files, and maintains consistency.

<when_to_activate> Use this skill when the user:

• Asks to create, build, or start a wiki or knowledge base.
• Asks to ingest, add, or process a source into their wiki.
• Asks a question that an existing wiki at the discovered location could answer.
• Asks to lint, audit, fix, health-check, clean up, or auto-repair their wiki — delegate the work to the wiki_auto_shaper agent (see <lint_and_audit>).
• References their wiki, knowledge base, or "notes" in a research context.
• Asks to capture procedural knowledge — workflows, conventions, runbooks — alongside the wiki's subject pages. </when_to_activate>

Three layers carry the wiki:

wiki/
├── SCHEMA.md           # Conventions, structure rules, domain config
├── index.md            # Sectioned content catalog with one-line summaries
├── log.md              # Chronological action log (append-only, rotated yearly)
├── raw/                # Layer 1: Immutable source material
│   ├── articles/       # Externally-published articles, web clippings
│   ├── papers/         # PDFs, arxiv papers
│   ├── meetings/       # Meeting notes, interviews, spoken-word transcripts (podcasts, talks)
│   ├── notes/          # Internal memos, discussion writeups, ad-hoc observations, internal docs not published externally
│   └── assets/         # Images, diagrams referenced by sources
├── entities/           # Layer 2: Entity pages (people, orgs, products, models)
├── concepts/           # Layer 2: Concept/topic pages
├── comparisons/        # Layer 2: Side-by-side analyses
├── queries/            # Layer 2: Filed query results worth keeping
├── summaries/          # Layer 2: Standalone overview / digest pages
└── procedures/         # Layer 2: Procedure / workflow / how-to pages

Layer 1 — Raw Sources. Immutable. The agent reads but never modifies these. Layer 2 — The Wiki. Agent-owned markdown files. Created, updated, and cross-referenced by the agent. Page types split into declarative (what / why) and procedural (how) — see <page_types> below. Layer 3 — The Schema. SCHEMA.md defines structure, conventions, and tag taxonomy. The linter reads its ## Frontmatter yaml block to learn the page-type enum, so wikis can declare additional types there without modifying the linter.

<folder_layout> The folder tree is the type axis only. Every page lives directly at <pluralized-type>/<slug>.md — flat, one layer deep. No thematic prefix (themes/ai/concepts/foo.md is wrong), no sub-folder nesting inside a type folder (concepts/ai/foo.md is wrong), no bare files at the wiki root. Thematic scope belongs in tags: and type:, not in folder names — tags have an enumerated taxonomy in SCHEMA.md and don't drift the way emergent theme folders do. The linter's structure check enforces this with blocking severity on misfiled pages (with a concrete move suggestion) and warn when an expected type folder is missing on disk. Because the wiki's primary consumer is an LLM with tools — which greps and follows links rather than browsing — visual folder shelving adds no real value and trades it for filing-drift risk. </folder_layout>

<page_types> Each page type answers a different shape of question. Pick by the entry point you (or a future operator) will re-find the page from.

Type	Answers	When to use
entity	"Who/what is X?"	A single named person, org, product, model, place — something with identity.
concept	"What does X mean, and why?"	An idea, mechanism, or technique that's describable on its own.
comparison	"How does X compare to Y?"	Side-by-side with dimensions and a verdict.
summary	"What's the overview of topic X?"	Topic-organized digest. Re-found by browsing the topic.
query	"What's the answer to my specific question?"	Question-organized synthesis. Re-found by re-asking.
procedure	"How should X be done?"	An evergreen rule, convention, or workflow. The page holds the rule; the instance that prompted it lives elsewhere.

<declarative_vs_procedural> Declarative vs procedural — the load-bearing split. Entity, concept, comparison, summary, and query capture what is true and why (subject knowledge). procedures/ captures how to act and how things should be organized (operational knowledge — workflows, conventions, runbooks, build steps, sourcing rules, review checklists, naming rules). A wiki without procedure pages is a research notebook; a wiki without the declarative types is just a runbook collection. Most projects need both. </declarative_vs_procedural>

<summary_vs_query> summary vs query. Same content, different framing. Topic-organized → summary. Question-organized → query. When both work, prefer summary — broader entry surface. File as query only when the question shape itself is what makes the answer valuable. </summary_vs_query>

<procedure_vs_concept> procedure vs concept. Both page types can answer "how" questions, but they answer different ones:

• A concept answers "how does X work?" or "what is X?" — the reader walks away understanding a feature, mechanism, or design choice the project implements. Concept pages can be deeply technical, can discuss how the system was built and why it was designed a certain way, and can carry rules that constrain authors. Those rules describe properties of the system ("errors must live in a closed set", "module folders contain main.mdl") — they are facts about how the project is built, not actions a contributor performs.
• A procedure answers "how do I do X?" or "what do I do when Y?" — the reader walks away with the sequence of actions needed to accomplish a specific task. Procedure pages are action lists: open this file, add this variant, implement these methods, run this test.

"How transformers attend" (how does X work → concept) vs "How to add a new training run" (how do I do X → procedure). Both contain "how". The first describes the system; the second prescribes an action sequence.

The trap: a page about how the system works can wear imperative voice and operator-facing scaffolding — trigger lists, "must" bullets, pitfalls — and still be a concept. Authorial rules that describe system properties belong on concept pages even when they constrain author behavior. A procedure page is the one that lists the actual steps a contributor takes (open file X, add variant Y, run command Z). If you are not writing those steps, you are not writing a procedure.

Test before you file. Write the question the page answers. "How does X work?" or "What is X?" → concept. "How do I do X?" or "What do I do when Y?" → procedure. If the answer to "how does this page help me?" is "I now understand how the system works", that is a concept; if the answer is "I now know the steps to take", that is a procedure. </procedure_vs_concept>

<page_anatomy> Page anatomy. Once the type is picked, write the sections in this order:

Type	Sections (in order)
entity	Overview · Key facts and dates · Relationships to other entities
concept	Definition / explanation · Current state of knowledge · Open questions or debates · Related concepts
comparison	What is being compared and why · Dimensions (table preferred) · Verdict / synthesis
summary	Topic and scope · Key findings by sub-topic · Open threads
query	Question (verbatim, as the page title) · Synthesized answer with cross-links · Confidence and caveats
procedure	One-paragraph rule summary · When this applies (the trigger) · The rule · Pitfalls / edge cases (optional, rule-shaped only) · See Also

Cross-links go in every section that references another wiki page. Source attribution lives in the sources: frontmatter — a list of raw/<kind>/<slug>.md paths the lint validates against disk. The frontmatter is the single source of truth; pages do not carry a separate body "Sources" section, and per-claim attribution uses inline standard-markdown links rather than footnote markers (see <write_or_update_pages>). External material the page was distilled from but that stays outside raw/ — e.g. doctrine in another repo — goes into an optional ## Derived from body section at the page bottom; the renamed heading does not match the linter's deprecated ## Sources regex, so it does not collide with the structured sources: channel. </page_anatomy>

</page_types>

Three bundled scripts handle discovery, init, and lint. **Always run `discover_wiki.sh` first** — never resolve the wiki path with your own inline Python or shell logic; the script is the single source of truth for walk-up semantics, and bypassing it is what causes silent upstream adoptions.

if output=$(scripts/discover_wiki.sh); then
    WIKI="$output"                                    # auto-resolved
else
    rc=$?
    case $rc in
        2) candidates="$output" ;;                    # ambiguous → ASK USER
        *) exit "$rc" ;;
    esac
    # On exit 2, follow <resolving_the_wiki_location> below before
    # touching any wiki file. Do not pick a candidate yourself.
fi
[[ -d "$WIKI" ]] || scripts/init_wiki.sh "$WIKI"    # scaffold if missing
python3 scripts/lint.py                              # health-check

<discover_wiki> discover_wiki.sh walks up level by level from the current working directory toward $HOME. At each level:

1. <level>/.no_wiki present → opted out; skip and continue up.
2. <level>/wiki/ present → record as the existing wiki and STOP walking (the search never crosses an existing wiki).
3. Neither → record as an "available" creation candidate and continue up.

The script auto-resolves on stdout (exit 0) when it can:

• The closest non-opted-out level already has wiki/ → print that path.
• Every level visited up through $HOME is opted out via .no_wiki → print $HOME/wiki (the explicit "use the global wiki" chain).

Otherwise the script exits 2 and lists every candidate in walk order on stdout, one per line, prefixed with its kind:

AVAILABLE:/Users/foo/projects/myproject/src
AVAILABLE:/Users/foo/projects/myproject
AVAILABLE:/Users/foo/projects
EXISTING:/Users/foo/wiki        # only as the last entry, if found

When CWD is not at or under $HOME, walk-up is disabled and the script falls back to the pre-walk-up behavior (./wiki/, ./.no_wiki, or ask).

.no_wiki is the explicit opt-out: drop an empty file by that name in any directory you do not want a local wiki for, and the walk skips that level. Place it at an existing <wiki-path>/.no_wiki to retire that wiki dir without deleting it. </discover_wiki>

<init_wiki> init_wiki.sh materializes SCHEMA.md, index.md, log.md, and the standard directory tree from canonical templates in references/template_schema.md, template_index.md, template_log.md. It refuses to overwrite an established wiki. To customize the schema beyond the placeholders, read references/template_schema.md for the full annotated template (domain, tag taxonomy, page-type sections, update policy). </init_wiki>

`lint.py` reads the page-type enum from `SCHEMA.md`'s `## Frontmatter` yaml block — wikis can extend the type set in their schema without touching the script. See `` below for the iteration loop; `references/lint_checks.md` has the full check matrix. The `wiki_auto_shaper` agent wraps `lint.py` with a complete assess → fix → verify loop in an isolated context — spawn it when the user asks for a broad audit, lint, fix, health-check, clean-up, or auto-repair pass over the wiki.

<fallback_without_scripts> Without access to the scripts, perform discovery inline by walking up from CWD toward $HOME: at each level, treat <level>/.no_wiki as "skip", a present <level>/wiki/ as a hit (and stop walking), anything else as a creation candidate. Auto-resolve only when the closest non-opted-out level already has wiki/ or every level up through $HOME is opted out (use $HOME/wiki). Otherwise follow the explicit workflow in <resolving_the_wiki_location> — never silently route to an upstream wiki. </fallback_without_scripts>

<resolving_the_wiki_location> This is the discovery flow. Every wiki operation — ingest, query, update, archive, lint, audit, init — runs it before touching any file in a wiki. The rule applies regardless of how the user phrased their request ("update the wiki", "add a page", "lint", etc.); the operation does not begin until this resolves.

<the_hard_rule> The hard rule. When discover_wiki.sh exits 2, you MUST present the candidates and ask the user, unless <adopt_when_user_named_the_path> applies. Do not silently adopt an upstream EXISTING: candidate when CWD is an unresolved AVAILABLE: level — the user may want a local wiki for this directory, and silently writing to a wiki one or more levels above the current project is a confidentiality and scoping mistake. Exit 2 is the script telling you the location is ambiguous, not a recommendation. </the_hard_rule>

<adopt_when_user_named_the_path> Carve-out to <the_hard_rule>. When the user's current request explicitly names one of the AVAILABLE: or EXISTING: paths returned by exit 2, adopt that path without prompting and report the adoption in one line so the auto-choice is observable to the user, e.g.

Using $WIKI=/path/to/wiki (per your message).

The user can correct in the next turn if the match was wrong — silence is the failure mode this surface report exists to prevent. Two bounds keep this safe:

• Only adopt a path the script surfaced. If the user named a path that is not on the exit-2 candidate list, fall back to the full <the_flow> — never invent or extrapolate a wiki location.
• Only when the user named exactly one candidate in the current request. If the user named none, or named more than one, present all candidates and ask. </adopt_when_user_named_the_path>

<the_flow>

<run_discovery> Run scripts/discover_wiki.sh.

• Exit 0 → the script printed a single resolved path on stdout. Adopt it as $WIKI. If the path does not yet exist on disk, init it with scripts/init_wiki.sh "$WIKI" before proceeding.
• Exit 2 → stdout is the candidate list (one AVAILABLE:<path> or EXISTING:<path> per line, in walk order from CWD upward). Continue with <present_candidates>. Do not pick a candidate yourself. </run_discovery>

<present_candidates> Present every candidate to the user, in walk order, with the kind spelled out so the choice is unambiguous:

• AVAILABLE — no wiki at that level yet; selecting it creates one there via init_wiki.sh.
• EXISTING — a wiki already lives at that level; selecting it adopts that wiki for the current operation.

Ask: "Which path should host the wiki for this operation?" Wait for the user's answer. </present_candidates>

<offer_no_wiki_markers> Offer .no_wiki markers for the unchosen AVAILABLE candidates between CWD (inclusive) and the chosen path (exclusive) — the levels the user walked over to reach their pick. Ask once, covering all of them in a single yes/no:

"Drop a .no_wiki opt-out marker in <path-1>, <path-2>, … so future walks from those subtrees skip straight past?"

On yes, create an empty .no_wiki file at each path. On no, leave them untouched. Levels above the chosen path are not offered markers — the walk-up will short-circuit at the chosen wiki anyway. </offer_no_wiki_markers>

<proceed_with_operation> Only now scaffold (if the chosen path needs it via init_wiki.sh) and proceed with the operation against $WIKI. </proceed_with_operation>

</the_flow>

<common_case> Common case worth calling out. CWD has no wiki and no .no_wiki, but a parent directory does. The script reports AVAILABLE:<CWD> followed by EXISTING:<parent>/wiki and exits 2. The default response is to ask — silently routing to the upstream is the mistake <the_hard_rule> exists to prevent. The user may want to (a) create a wiki right here, (b) drop a .no_wiki here and let the upstream wiki own this subtree from now on, or (c) adopt the upstream wiki for this session without a marker. They pick. The single exception is <adopt_when_user_named_the_path> — when the user's current request already named one of the candidates, adopt it and report the adoption in one line instead of asking. </common_case>

</resolving_the_wiki_location>

<resuming_an_existing_wiki> When the user has an existing wiki, always orient yourself before doing anything:

1. Read SCHEMA.md — understand the domain, conventions, and tag taxonomy.
2. Read index.md — learn what pages exist and their summaries.
3. Scan recent log.md — read the last 20–30 entries with tail -n 350 "$WIKI/log.md" (cap each entry at roughly 20 lines; tune the tail by entry length). The log can grow to 500 entries before rotation; a full read wastes context.

Only after orientation should you ingest, query, or lint. Skipping this causes duplicate pages, missed cross-references, schema-contradiction, and repeated work.

For large wikis (100+ pages), also run a quick recursive search (rg / grep -r) for the topic at hand before creating anything new. </resuming_an_existing_wiki>

<initializing_a_new_wiki> When the user asks to create or start a wiki, <resolving_the_wiki_location> already covers steps 1–3 (run discovery, present candidates, offer .no_wiki markers in unchosen levels). The init-specific steps follow once $WIKI is chosen:

1. Run init_wiki.sh "$WIKI" against the chosen path to scaffold SCHEMA.md, index.md, log.md, and the directory tree.
2. Customize the schema. Ask the user what domain the wiki covers — be specific. The freshly initialized SCHEMA.md has placeholder text in the Domain and Tag Taxonomy sections. Read references/template_schema.md for what each section should contain. Define 10–20 starting tags before any pages are written, since the linter flags off-taxonomy tags.
3. Confirm the wiki is ready and suggest first sources to ingest. </initializing_a_new_wiki>

<core_operations>

When the user provides a source (URL, file, paste), integrate it into the wiki:

<capture_raw_source> Capture the raw source:

• URL of an externally-published article → fetch, convert to markdown, save to raw/articles/.
• PDF / arxiv paper → extract text, save to raw/papers/.
• Meeting note, interview, spoken-word transcript (podcast, talk) → save to raw/meetings/.
• Internal memo, discussion writeup, ad-hoc observation, internal doc not published externally → save to raw/notes/.
• Pasted text → save to the appropriate raw/ subdirectory by kind, not by source format.
• For edge cases (article that embeds a transcript, transcript of a private meeting, paste of unknown provenance, etc.) consult references/raw_taxonomy.md — the canonical reference for bucket meanings and classification heuristics.
• Name files descriptively: raw/articles/transformer-architecture-2024.md.
• Add raw frontmatter (source_url, ingested, sha256 of the body — body-only). Compute and write the hash with python3 scripts/compute_sha256.py raw/<kind>/<slug>.md — never invent the value by hand. On re-ingest of the same URL: run the same command, skip if it reports ok, flag drift if it reports update.
• Keep cross-references out of the raw body. A relative .md link from one raw file to another is ingester synthesis, not source content (originals cite by URL, not by ingester-picked slugs). File the cross-reference on the wiki page that cites both sources instead. </capture_raw_source>

<discuss_takeaways> Discuss takeaways with the user — what's interesting, what matters for the domain. (Skip in automated/cron contexts.) </discuss_takeaways>

<check_what_already_exists> Check what already exists — search index.md and run a recursive search to find existing pages for mentioned entities/concepts. The difference between a growing wiki and a pile of duplicates. </check_what_already_exists>

<write_or_update_pages> Write or update wiki pages:

• Page thresholds — apply the right action for what you found:
  • Create a new page when an entity/concept appears in 2+ sources OR is central to one source.
  • Add to an existing page when content is already covered there.
  • Skip passing mentions, minor details, or material outside the domain.
  • Split a page that exceeds ~200 lines into sub-topics with cross-links.
  • Archive a page whose content is fully superseded — see <archive>.
• Update Policy — when new content conflicts with what's already on a page:
  1. Check the dates — newer sources generally supersede older ones.
  2. If genuinely contradictory, record both positions with their dates and sources on the page.
  3. Mark the contradiction in frontmatter: contradictions: [other-page-slug] and contested: true.
  4. Rely on lint to surface contested pages for user review — leave the resolution to the human.
• Updating existing pages: always bump the updated date.
• Cross-reference: every new/updated page links to ≥2 others.
• Tags: only from SCHEMA.md's taxonomy. Add new tags to SCHEMA.md before using them on a page.
• Provenance: this is an LLM-first wiki, so attribution stays next to the claim it attributes — content that belongs together stays together. Claim-level attribution uses inline standard-markdown links: Transformers replaced RNNs by 2019 ([Vaswani 2017](../raw/papers/attention-is-all-you-need.md)). No footnote markers ([^name] / [^name]: …) and no bottom-of-page "Sources" collection: both split the claim from its evidence across the page, force the reader (human or LLM) to resolve markers separately, and duplicate what the frontmatter already encodes. The page-level sources: frontmatter is the canonical inventory; inline links pin specific claims to specific sources within that inventory, and the lint validates both against disk.
• External derivation: when a page is distilled from material that is not itself the subject of classification — doctrine in another repo, a codebase, a notebook, a SKILL.md the page summarizes — that material stays where it lives, and the page records the lineage in an optional ## Derived from body section near the bottom of the page (bulleted list of external paths, URLs, or descriptors with whatever standing commentary applies, e.g. "no parallel repo at the time of writing; re-anchor when one exists"). The renamed heading is deliberately distinct from ## Sources so the linter does not flag it as the deprecated body-Sources collection. Use ## Derived from for "the page exists because that exists, but that is not raw material to ingest"; use sources: frontmatter for "this page draws on raw/<kind>/<slug>.md material the wiki owns". A page may have either, both, or neither.
• Confidence: opinion-heavy / fast-moving / single-source claims → confidence: medium or low. Reserve high for multi-source support. </write_or_update_pages>

<update_navigation> Update navigation:

• Add new pages to index.md under the correct section, alphabetically. Update "Total pages" + "Last updated".
• Append to log.md: ## [YYYY-MM-DD] ingest | Source Title. List only files actually created or updated in this ingest. Skip files that were inspected, considered, or deliberately left unchanged, and do not narrate decisions about what not to do. Aim for roughly 20 lines per entry — if it grows past that, the entry is logging non-changes or prose that belongs on a wiki page instead. </update_navigation>

<run_linter_and_iterate> Run the linter and iterate — python3 scripts/lint.py. Fix every blocking finding before declaring complete. This is the narrow post-ingest check; for broad audits across the whole wiki, spawn the wiki_auto_shaper agent instead. See <lint_and_audit> below. </run_linter_and_iterate>

<report_what_changed> Report what changed to the user — list only files actually created or updated, matching what the log entry contains. </report_what_changed>

<bulk_ingest> Bulk ingest (multiple sources at once): batch the work — read all sources first, identify all entities/concepts in one pass, check existing pages once (not N times), write in one pass, update index.md once, single batch log entry. Bulk ingests are the most likely operation to introduce structural issues, so always lint to clean. </bulk_ingest>

<capture_procedure> When the user asks to record a workflow rule, convention, or runbook — or you notice an operational pattern worth keeping — file it as a procedure page. The page holds the evergreen rule; the worked example that prompted it lives elsewhere. The default failure mode here is over-indexing on the current example: a procedure page should still read as a rule six months from now on a different task, with none of today's specifics in it.

Run every step in order:

<name_the_rule> Name the rule. State the policy in 1–3 sentences using the form "When [trigger], do [action], because [reason]." Keep the trigger and action operator-neutral; "after every ingest that touches 5+ entities" is a trigger, "the user just asked X" is not. Confirm the page reads as steps for an operator to follow — pages that read as facts about how a mechanism works belong in concepts/, even when worded as "rules". </name_the_rule>

<strip_the_instance> Strip the instance. Replace every proper noun, file path, person's name, date, error message, command output, and task-specific value with a category placeholder, or delete it. Read the page back. If it still reads as a rule, the rule is the carrier; if the page collapses without the stripped specifics, the example was the carrier and the rule still needs to be written. </strip_the_instance>

<hoist_non_rule_content> Hoist non-rule content to its proper home:

• Source-specific anecdote → sidecar in raw/<kind>/<slug>.md.
• Mechanism explanation ("why this works") → the relevant concepts/ page.
• Generic war-story without a reusable rule → discard. Not every experience earns a page. </hoist_non_rule_content>

<bound_the_page> Bound the page. Keep atomic procedure pages 30–80 lines. Hub pages that chain atomics stay 30–60 lines and link out rather than restating the underlying rules. Past the bound, hoist worked content per <hoist_non_rule_content> or split into two atomic pages. </bound_the_page>

<generality_tests> A procedure page that survives all three tests is a keeper:

• Strip-the-name test. Replace every proper noun, path, and date with X. Read the page back. The rule still reads as a rule.
• Future-operator test. A different operator, six months from now, on a different task in the same domain, recognizes this trigger and applies this action.
• Reusability test. The trigger fires more than once. One-off circumstances belong on the source sidecar where they happened, not in procedures/. </generality_tests>

<update_navigation_for_procedure> Update navigation: add the new procedure page to index.md under the procedures section, alphabetically. Update "Total pages" + "Last updated". </update_navigation_for_procedure>

**Reference:** `references/template_schema.md` carries the page anatomy (sections, atomic vs. hub split, hoist destinations).

</capture_procedure>

When the user asks a question about the wiki's domain:

1. Read index.md to identify relevant pages.
2. For wikis with 100+ pages, also run a recursive search across all .md files for key terms — the index alone may miss relevant content.
3. Read the relevant pages.
4. Synthesize an answer with citations: "Based on page-a and page-b…"
5. File valuable answers back if the answer would be painful to re-derive (multi-source synthesis, structured comparison, novel reasoning). Pick the type by entry point: comparisons/ for X-vs-Y, summaries/ for topic-organized digests, queries/ for question-organized answers (see <page_types>). Skip trivial lookups.
6. Update log.md with the query and whether it was filed.

When content is fully superseded or the domain scope changes:

1. Create _archive/ if it doesn't exist; move the page there preserving its path (e.g., _archive/entities/old-page.md).
2. Remove from index.md.
3. Update inbound links — replace with plain text + "(archived)".
4. Log the archive action.
5. Run python3 scripts/lint.py to catch any inbound link you missed.

<lint_and_audit> Two paths, picked by scope.

<broad_audits> Broad audits — spawn the wiki_auto_shaper agent. When the user asks to lint, audit, fix, health-check, clean up, or auto-repair the wiki — or the wiki has accumulated drift across many pages — delegate to the wiki_auto_shaper agent. The agent runs a complete assess → fix → verify loop in an isolated context: runs lint.py, audits the prose for issues the linter cannot see (topic mixing, type/anatomy mismatch, procedure-page instance leakage, content violations of the page-type anatomy), fixes every blocking and warn finding, splits or relocates pages where the schema demands it, re-lints until the wiki is clean, appends the audit entry to log.md, and reports back a per-file change list. Keep that work in the agent rather than running the iteration loop inline — the fix loop on a real wiki touches dozens of files and displaces conversation context. </broad_audits>

<narrow_inline_checks> Narrow inline checks — run lint.py directly. After a single ingest, a single archive, a schema edit, or a small batch update, run the linter in-flow and fix what it surfaces:

python3 scripts/lint.py              # auto-discover ./wiki (or ~/wiki when ./.no_wiki present)
python3 scripts/lint.py /custom/path # explicit override
python3 scripts/lint.py --quiet      # blocking + warn only

Findings come in three buckets:

• blocking — broken links, missing/malformed frontmatter, missing index.md, missing or unparseable SCHEMA.md (no extractable type enum). Exits 1; must fix.
• warn — orphans, contested pages, source drift, off-taxonomy tags, invalid enum/date values, pages missing from the index, verbatim-boilerplate mismatches (e.g., the SCHEMA.md prelude or log.md preamble drifting from the canonical templates in references/).
• info — markdown style nits, oversized pages, low-confidence single-source pages, unused taxonomy tags, log over 500 entries.

Full check matrix: references/lint_checks.md. </narrow_inline_checks>

<inline_iteration_loop> Inline iteration loop. When the lint scope is narrow (one ingest, one archive), run, fix the highest-severity findings, re-run. Repeat until the script exits 0 or only acceptable info-level findings remain. Append the outcome to log.md:

## [YYYY-MM-DD] lint | N blocking, N warn, N info

If a check is wrong for the situation (e.g., a deliberately oversized synthesis page), don't silence by editing the script — note the rationale on the page or in SCHEMA.md and accept the info-level finding. The script surfaces, doesn't enforce. </inline_iteration_loop>

</lint_and_audit>

</core_operations>

<operational_discipline>

```bash rg "transformer" "$WIKI" -g "*.md" # by content fd -e md . "$WIKI" # by filename rg "tags:.*alignment" "$WIKI" -g "*.md" # by tag tail -n 350 "$WIKI/log.md" # ~last 20 log entries ```

<appending_to_log> "Append-only" means newest at the bottom of the file. The Edit tool's old_string matching makes it easy to anchor on a header and insert before it, producing inverted order. Avoid that:

• Anchor on the previous entry's last body line, never on a ## [YYYY-MM-DD] header. New content (blank line + new header + body) goes after the anchor.

• Cluster ordering matches file ordering. When one workflow produces several entries (ingest → sidecar update → cite), write them earliest-first within the cluster — same direction as the whole-file rule. Resist reverse-chronological "outcome first" narrative ordering.

• Verify after every log edit:

  grep -n '^## \[' "$WIKI/log.md" | tail -5
  

  The new entry's line number must be the largest. If not, fix before continuing. </appending_to_log>

</operational_discipline>

Quick-scan reminders. See the named section for full guidance.

<resolve_before_writing> Resolve before writing — discover_wiki.sh exit 2 means ambiguous, not "use the upstream". Always present candidates and ask the user, even when an EXISTING: parent wiki shows up in the list. Silent upstream adoption is a confidentiality and scoping mistake. (see <resolving_the_wiki_location>) </resolve_before_writing>

<orient_first> Orient first — read SCHEMA + index + recent log before any operation. (see <resuming_an_existing_wiki>) </orient_first>

<raw_is_read_only> raw/ is read-only — corrections live in wiki pages, not in the source. </raw_is_read_only>

<cross_references_are_layer_2> Cross-references are layer 2, not raw — synthesis links between sources live on the wiki page that cites both, never inside a raw body. (see <capture_raw_source> in <ingest>) </cross_references_are_layer_2>

<update_navigation_reminder> Update navigation — index.md and log.md lag → wiki degrades. (see <update_navigation> in <ingest>) </update_navigation_reminder>

<log_only_what_changed> Log only what changed — log entries list files actually created or updated; never narrate inspected-but-unchanged files or "did not edit" decisions. (see <update_navigation> in <ingest>) </log_only_what_changed>

<page_thresholds> Page thresholds — passing mentions don't earn a page. (template_schema.md) </page_thresholds>

<cross_link_or_vanish> Cross-link or vanish — every page links to ≥2 others. </cross_link_or_vanish>

<frontmatter_is_required> Frontmatter is required — enables search, filtering, staleness detection. </frontmatter_is_required>

<tags_from_taxonomy_only> Tags from taxonomy only — add new tags to SCHEMA first. </tags_from_taxonomy_only>

<pages_stay_scannable> Pages stay scannable — split at >200 lines; deep dives go to dedicated pages. </pages_stay_scannable>

<generalize_procedure_pages> Generalize procedure pages — name the rule, strip the instance, hoist worked content to raw/ sidecars or concept pages. The page reads as a rule on a different task next month, or it isn't a procedure. (see <capture_procedure>) </generalize_procedure_pages>

<procedure_or_concept> Procedure or concept? — file pages an operator reads as steps to follow under procedures/; file pages a reader reads as facts about how something works under concepts/. Wording the body as "rules govern X" does not turn a description into a procedure. (see <page_types> and <capture_procedure>) </procedure_or_concept>

<confirm_scope> Confirm scope — ingests touching 10+ existing pages need user OK first. </confirm_scope>

<rotate_log_at_500> Rotate the log at 500 entries — log.md → log-YYYY.md. </rotate_log_at_500>

<contradictions_are_explicit> Contradictions are explicit — record both with dates, mark in frontmatter, flag for review. </contradictions_are_explicit>