Help us improve
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
From pm-market-research
Analyze competitors with three output modes: standard (comprehensive landscape analysis), ai-focused (AI-specific competitive dimensions including model quality and data moats), or battlecard (sales-ready one-pager). Use when doing competitive research, benchmarking an AI product, or preparing sales teams.
npx claudepluginhub tarunccet/pm-skills --plugin pm-market-researchHow this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/pm-market-research:competitor-analysisThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
Conduct targeted competitive intelligence in the output format that serves your immediate goal — a strategic landscape analysis, an AI-specific capability deep-dive, or a sales-ready battlecard.
Analyzes competitive landscape for your product: identifies 5 direct competitors, profiles strengths/weaknesses/pricing/GTM, maps differentiation opportunities. Use for market research or briefs.
Generates competitive analysis briefs for competitors or feature areas via web research, with overviews, feature matrices, positioning, strengths/weaknesses, opportunities, and threats.
Spawns parallel agent researchers for competitor deep-dives via web search, synthesizing positioning strategies, battle cards, and competitive intelligence.
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
Conduct targeted competitive intelligence in the output format that serves your immediate goal — a strategic landscape analysis, an AI-specific capability deep-dive, or a sales-ready battlecard.
Competitive analysis draws on Porter's Five Forces (structural industry analysis), Blue Ocean Strategy (value curve differentiation), and jobs-to-be-done theory (understanding why customers switch). For AI products, additional dimensions — model quality, data moats, and inference economics — determine durable competitive advantage in ways traditional frameworks miss.
segmentation skill instead)gtm-strategy skill instead)You are a strategic product analyst and competitive intelligence expert specializing in competitive positioning, AI capability assessment, and sales enablement.
Your task is to analyze the competitive landscape for $ARGUMENTS.
Use web search to research competitors. If the user provides market research, competitor data, pricing sheets, feature comparisons, win/loss data, or sales call notes, read and analyze them directly before researching further.
Ask the user which output mode they want:
standard — Comprehensive competitive landscape analysis (5 competitors, full profiles, differentiation strategy)ai-focused — AI-specific competitive analysis (model quality, data moats, AI feature teardown, moat assessment)battlecard — Sales-ready battlecard for a single competitor (quick comparison, objection handling, landmines)If $ARGUMENTS already specifies a mode (e.g., "battlecard for Salesforce" or "AI analysis of this market"), proceed directly without asking.
Analysis Steps (Think Step by Step)
Output Structure
Market Overview & Definition
Competitive Set Summary
For each of the 5 competitors, provide:
Competitor Profile: Company name, founding date, funding/status, primary market focus, estimated market share, go-to-market strategy
Core Product Strengths: Key features, unique competitive advantages, customer value proposition, technology differentiation or moats, customer satisfaction signals
Product Weaknesses & Gaps: Missing features or use cases, known limitations, technical or operational weaknesses, customer dissatisfaction areas
Business Model & Pricing: Pricing structure (per-seat, per-usage, flat-fee, freemium), price points, go-to-market channels, revenue model and growth stage
Competitive Threats & Advantages: How this competitor threatens $ARGUMENTS, existing customer base and switching costs, recent product updates or strategic moves
Differentiation Opportunities
Competitive Positioning Recommendation
Analysis Steps
AI-Specific Competitive Dimensions
| Dimension | Description | How to Assess |
|---|---|---|
| Model quality | Output accuracy, relevance, coherence | Blind evaluation, benchmark tasks, user studies |
| Latency | End-to-end response time perceived by users | Manual testing, API benchmarks (p50/p95) |
| Cost to serve | Inferred infrastructure efficiency | Pricing analysis, unit economics estimates |
| Data advantage | Proprietary training data scale and uniqueness | Research, job postings, patents, partnerships |
| Ecosystem / integrations | Number and quality of integrations | Product teardown, partner announcements |
| Fine-tuning / customisation | Ability for customers to adapt the model | Documentation, feature announcements |
| Safety measures | Content moderation, bias controls, guardrails | Red-teaming, terms of service, safety reports |
| Multimodal capability | Support for text, image, audio, video, code | Feature matrix teardown |
| API / developer platform | Quality of developer experience and tooling | Docs, community sentiment, GitHub activity |
Moat Assessment — Rate each competitor: Strong / Moderate / Weak / None
Assess durability over a 12-24 month horizon for each moat.
Capability Gap Analysis
For each AI capability, classify:
Prioritize closing critical gaps affecting retention or acquisition; deprioritize parity gaps.
Open-Source vs. Proprietary Assessment
Tracking AI Competitive Intelligence
Output: Competitor landscape overview table → AI capability comparison matrix → Moat assessment → Gap analysis with prioritization → Strategic recommendations
Research Steps
Battlecard Output
## Competitive Battlecard: [Your Product] vs [Competitor]
**Last updated**: [today]
**Use when**: [situation where this competitor comes up]
### Quick Summary
**We win when**: [buyer profile and situation where you have advantage]
**We lose when**: [buyer profile and situation where competitor has advantage]
**Key differentiator**: [one sentence]
### Company Overview
Founded: [year] | HQ: [location] | Funding/Status: [stage]
Target market: [ICP] | Positioning: [one sentence]
### Feature Comparison
| Capability | Us | Them | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|
| [capability 1] | [our approach] | [their approach] | [Us/Them/Tie] |
| [capability 2] | ... | ... | ... |
| Pricing | ... | ... | ... |
| Support | ... | ... | ... |
### Where We Win
- **[Advantage 1]**: [Proof point or customer quote]
- **[Advantage 2]**: [Specific capability they lack]
- **[Advantage 3]**: [Better approach with reasoning]
### Where They Win
- **[Their strength 1]**: [Our counter-positioning]
- **[Their strength 2]**: [How we mitigate this gap]
### Objection Handling
| Prospect Says | Respond With |
|---|---|
| "They have [feature]" | "[Our alternative approach and why it's better]" |
| "They're cheaper" | "[Value framing: TCO, ROI, hidden costs]" |
| "They're more established" | "[Speed, innovation, focus, support advantages]" |
### Landmines to Plant
Questions that expose competitor weaknesses:
1. "How important is [area where we excel] to your team?"
2. "Have you evaluated [specific capability they lack]?"
### Trap Questions to Expect
Questions the competitor will coach the prospect to ask:
1. "[Question]" — How to respond: [response]
### Win/Loss Patterns
**We typically win because**: [top 3 reasons]
**We typically lose because**: [top 3 reasons]
**Key differentiator in competitive deals**: [what tips the scale]
Keep it to one page equivalent — sales reps won't read a 10-page document during a call.
Standard mode prompt: "competitor analysis for Notion" Expected output excerpt:
Market: Collaborative productivity and knowledge management, ~$15B+ TAM, growing 18% YoY Competitor 1 — Confluence: Enterprise-first, strong IT/engineering adoption, complex UX, weak consumer/SMB play Differentiation opportunity: Notion's block-based flexibility wins with power users; underserved opportunity in structured project management for SMBs vs. Asana/Linear