From ai-marketing-skills
Runs 38-point SEO and AI optimization audit on any URL, evaluating fundamentals, content structure, AI/GEO readiness, and E-E-A-T signals. Delivers scored report with prioritized fixes for search visibility.
npx claudepluginhub superamped/ai-marketing-skills --plugin ai-marketing-skillsThis skill uses the workspace's default tool permissions.
Ask your AI tool to audit a URL for search and AI readiness. You can optionally request a focus area — `seo-only`, `geo-only`, `eeat-only`, or `content-only`.
Runs SEO and GEO audits on URLs covering technical SEO, content quality, E-E-A-T signals, and AI citation readiness. Use when evaluating search performance or diagnosing ranking issues.
Audits websites for technical and on-page SEO: crawlability, robots.txt, sitemaps, canonicals, HTTPS, mobile-friendliness, PageSpeed, Core Web Vitals. Scores issues and suggests fixes.
Audits on-page SEO for titles, headers, images, links, meta with scored reports and prioritized fix recommendations. Useful for diagnosing page ranking issues.
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
Ask your AI tool to audit a URL for search and AI readiness. You can optionally request a focus area — seo-only, geo-only, eeat-only, or content-only.
Fetch the page at the provided URL. Extract:
Then fetch these three files from the same domain:
{domain}/robots.txt — check for AI crawler directives{domain}/sitemap.xml — check for existence{domain}/llms.txt — check for existenceEvaluate traditional SEO hygiene. These are prerequisites — if broken, nothing else matters.
Evaluate how well the content is structured for both human readers and AI extraction.
Evaluate technical signals that determine whether AI systems can find, extract, and cite this page.
Evaluate trust signals that determine whether AI systems choose to cite this page over competitors.
Present the report in this exact structure:
# Page Audit Report
**URL:** [url]
**Date:** [current date]
**Overall Score:** X/38
---
## SEO Fundamentals (X/10)
✓/✗ HTTPS
✓/✗ Title tag — [note: actual title, character count]
✓/✗ Meta description — [note: actual description, character count]
✓/✗ Single H1
✓/✗ Heading hierarchy
✓/✗ Image alt text — [note: X of Y images have alt text]
✓/✗ Clean URL
✓/✗ Internal links
✓/✗ Crawlable content
✓/✗ Page speed
## Content Structure (X/10)
✓/✗ Direct answer up front
✓/✗ Question-based headings
✓/✗ Short paragraphs
✓/✗ FAQ section
✓/✗ Comparison tables
✓/✗ Lists for structure
✓/✗ "[TERM] is..." definitions
✓/✗ Conversational keywords
✓/✗ Intent clusters
✓/✗ Multimedia
## AI & GEO Readiness (X/10)
✓/✗ AI crawler access — [note: which crawlers blocked/allowed]
✓/✗ llms.txt
✓/✗ Organization schema
✓/✗ Article/Page schema — [note: type found, dateModified present?]
✓/✗ FAQPage schema
✓/✗ Author schema
✓/✗ BreadcrumbList schema
✓/✗ Schema validates
✓/✗ Mobile responsive
✓/✗ Sitemap inclusion
## E-E-A-T & Authority (X/8)
✓/✗ Author identified — [note: author name if found]
✓/✗ Author bio present
✓/✗ Author page exists
✓/✗ Sources cited — [note: X citations found]
✓/✗ Original data or insight
✓/✗ Freshness signals — [note: dates found]
✓/✗ Trust pages accessible
✓/✗ About page with entity info
---
## Score Summary
| Category | Score | Rating |
|----------|-------|--------|
| SEO Fundamentals | X/10 | |
| Content Structure | X/10 | |
| AI & GEO Readiness | X/10 | |
| E-E-A-T & Authority | X/8 | |
| **Overall** | **X/38** | |
**Rating scale:** 90%+ Excellent | 75-89% Good | 60-74% Needs Work | Below 60% Poor
---
## Priority Fixes
[Top 5 failed criteria ranked by impact. For each:]
1. **[Failed criterion]** — [Why it matters + specific fix with actual suggested text/code where possible]
2. ...
<script type="application/ld+json"> and evaluate each block.