Skill

first-principles-decomposer

From sundial-org-awesome-openclaw-skills-4

Breaks problems down to fundamental truths by surfacing assumptions, then rebuilds solutions from atomic principles. Useful for product/feature design, stuck problems, or challenging conventions.

developer-tools

Install

npx claudepluginhub joshuarweaver/cascade-ai-ml-agents-misc-2 --plugin sundial-org-awesome-openclaw-skills-4

Tool Access

This skill uses the workspace's default tool permissions.

Preview

- Designing new products or features

Supporting Assets

references/examples.mdreferences/framework.mdreferences/integrated-frameworks.md

SKILL.md

Similar Skills

cache-components

Guides Next.js Cache Components and Partial Prerendering (PPR) with cacheComponents enabled. Implements 'use cache', cacheLife(), cacheTag(), revalidateTag(), static/dynamic optimization, and cache debugging.

cache-components

139.2k

mcp-builder

9 files

Guides building MCP servers enabling LLMs to interact with external services via tools. Covers best practices, TypeScript/Node (MCP SDK), Python (FastMCP).

anthropics-skills-13

124.2k

canvas-design

20 files

Generates original PNG/PDF visual art via design philosophy manifestos for posters, graphics, and static designs on user request.

anthropics-skills-13

124.2k

Stats

Stars586

Forks75

Last CommitFeb 1, 2026

Actions

View Source View Plugin View on GitHub View README

First Principles Decomposer

When To Use

Designing new products or features
Feeling stuck on a complex problem
Existing solutions seem overcomplicated
Need to challenge assumptions
Starting any new project or initiative

The Process

Phase 1: Identify Assumptions

Ask: "What am I assuming to be true that might not be?" List every assumption embedded in the current approach.

Phase 2: Break to Atoms

For each assumption, ask: "What is the most fundamental truth here?" Keep asking "why?" until you hit bedrock facts.

Phase 3: Rebuild From Truth

Starting ONLY from verified fundamentals, ask: "What's the simplest solution that addresses the core need?"

Interactive Flow

When user invokes this skill:

Clarify the problem (1-2 questions max)
Surface assumptions - list what's being taken for granted
Decompose to fundamentals - show the atomic truths
Rebuild solution - construct from ground up
Compare - show how this differs from conventional approach

Output Format

PROBLEM: [stated problem]

ASSUMPTIONS IDENTIFIED:
1. [assumption] → Challenge: [why this might be wrong]
2. [assumption] → Challenge: [why this might be wrong]

FUNDAMENTAL TRUTHS:
• [bedrock fact 1]
• [bedrock fact 2]
• [bedrock fact 3]

REBUILT SOLUTION:
[New approach built only from fundamentals]

VS CONVENTIONAL:
[How this differs from the obvious approach]

Example Triggers

"Break down our parent communication problem from first principles"
"I want to rethink how we do [X] from the ground up"
"What are we assuming about [problem] that might be wrong?"

Integration

This skill compounds with:

inversion-strategist - After rebuilding from fundamentals, invert to find what would guarantee failure of the new approach
second-order-consequences - Project downstream effects of implementing the rebuilt solution
pre-mortem-analyst - Stress-test the rebuilt solution by imagining its failure
six-thinking-hats - Apply all six perspectives to validate each fundamental truth identified

Skill Metadata

Created: 2026-01-06 Last Updated: 2026-01-06 Author: Artem Version: 1.0

See references/framework.md for detailed methodology See references/examples.md for Artem-specific examples See references/integrated-frameworks.md for Stanford Design Thinking + MIT Systems Engineering combo