Audit existing sales funnels against RMBC and CRO best practices — score each step, identify conversion leaks, and output a prioritized fix matrix.
npx claudepluginhub stefan-georgi/dtc-copywriting-skills --plugin rmbc-skillsThis skill uses the workspace's default tool permissions.
Guides Next.js Cache Components and Partial Prerendering (PPR) with cacheComponents enabled. Implements 'use cache', cacheLife(), cacheTag(), revalidateTag(), static/dynamic optimization, and cache debugging.
Migrates code, prompts, and API calls from Claude Sonnet 4.0/4.5 or Opus 4.1 to Opus 4.5, updating model strings on Anthropic, AWS, GCP, Azure platforms.
Reviews prose for communication issues impeding comprehension, outputs minimal fixes in a three-column table per Microsoft Writing Style Guide. Useful for 'review prose' or 'improve prose' requests.
_RMBC_ROOT=""
[ -d "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../../bin" ] && _RMBC_ROOT="$(cd "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../.." && pwd)"
[ -z "$_RMBC_ROOT" ] && for _D in "$HOME/.claude/skills/dtc-copywriting-skills" ".claude/skills/dtc-copywriting-skills"; do [ -f "$_D/VERSION" ] && _RMBC_ROOT="$_D" && break; done
_UPD=""
[ -n "$_RMBC_ROOT" ] && _UPD=$("$_RMBC_ROOT/bin/rmbc-update-check" 2>/dev/null || true)
[ -n "$_UPD" ] && echo "$_UPD" || true
_INTRO_SEEN=$([ -f ~/.rmbc-skills/.intro-seen ] && echo "yes" || echo "no")
_TEL_PROMPTED=$([ -f ~/.rmbc-skills/.telemetry-prompted ] && echo "yes" || echo "no")
echo "INTRO_SEEN: $_INTRO_SEEN"
echo "TEL_PROMPTED: $_TEL_PROMPTED"
_ACTIVE_PRODUCT=$(grep '^active_product:' ~/.rmbc-skills/config.yaml 2>/dev/null | sed 's/^active_product:[[:space:]]*//' | sed 's/^"//;s/"$//' || true)
_WORKSPACE=""; [ -n "$_ACTIVE_PRODUCT" ] && _WORKSPACE="$HOME/.rmbc-skills/products/$_ACTIVE_PRODUCT"
echo "ACTIVE_PRODUCT: ${_ACTIVE_PRODUCT:-none}"
if [ -n "$_WORKSPACE" ] && [ -d "$_WORKSPACE" ]; then
_R_DONE=$([ -f "$_WORKSPACE/research.md" ] && echo "yes" || echo "no")
_M_DONE=$([ -f "$_WORKSPACE/mechanism.md" ] && echo "yes" || echo "no")
_B_DONE=$([ -f "$_WORKSPACE/brief.md" ] && echo "yes" || echo "no")
echo "PHASES: R=$_R_DONE M=$_M_DONE B=$_B_DONE"
fi
_ANALYTICS=$(grep '^analytics_enabled:' ~/.rmbc-skills/config.yaml 2>/dev/null | sed 's/^analytics_enabled:[[:space:]]*//' || echo "true")
[ "$_ANALYTICS" = "true" ] && [ -n "$_RMBC_ROOT" ] && timeout 2 "$_RMBC_ROOT/bin/rmbc-analytics" log --skill "funnel-audit" --product "${_ACTIVE_PRODUCT:-none}" --tier 3 2>/dev/null &
_SESSION_COUNT=$(ls /tmp/rmbc-session-* 2>/dev/null | wc -l | tr -d ' '); touch "/tmp/rmbc-session-$$"
echo "SESSIONS: $_SESSION_COUNT"
If output shows UPGRADE_AVAILABLE <old> <new>: read skills/rmbc-upgrade/SKILL.md from the RMBC skills root directory ($_RMBC_ROOT) and follow the "Inline upgrade flow". If JUST_UPGRADED <old> <new>: read $_RMBC_ROOT/CHANGELOG.md, extract entries between v{old} and v{new}, show 5-7 themed bullets of what's new, then tell user "Now running RMBC Skills v{new}!" and continue.
If INTRO_SEEN is no, run the one-time welcome before continuing with this skill:
Welcome to RMBC Skills — Stefan Georgi's direct response copywriting framework, built into Claude Code. 44 skills covering hooks, ads, emails, landing pages, VSL scripts, and more.
Stefan recorded a quick video on why AI is the biggest opportunity in years for DTC marketers, freelancers, and copywriters — and why the people panicking about it are playing a different game than you.
Use AskUserQuestion:
If "Yes, open the video":
open "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zI8tNfefH1M"
mkdir -p ~/.rmbc-skills
touch ~/.rmbc-skills/.intro-seen
If "Skip — let's go":
mkdir -p ~/.rmbc-skills
touch ~/.rmbc-skills/.intro-seen
Continue with this skill immediately.
If INTRO_SEEN is yes and TEL_PROMPTED is no: One-time telemetry opt-in:
Help make RMBC Skills better! Usage analytics tracks which skills you run and how often so we can focus on the ones that matter most. Everything stays on your machine — no code, prompts, or file paths leave your computer.
Use AskUserQuestion:
If "Yes, that's fine":
mkdir -p ~/.rmbc-skills
touch ~/.rmbc-skills/.telemetry-prompted
If "No, turn it off":
mkdir -p ~/.rmbc-skills
touch ~/.rmbc-skills/.telemetry-prompted
sed -i '' 's/^analytics_enabled:.*/analytics_enabled: false/' ~/.rmbc-skills/config.yaml 2>/dev/null || true
Continue with this skill.
Audit an existing DTC sales funnel against RMBC methodology and CRO best practices. Every funnel leaks revenue somewhere — the question is where and how much. This skill evaluates each step in the funnel (traffic → landing → order → upsell → thank you → email) with per-step scoring across five dimensions. Output: a funnel health score (0-100), identification of the top 3 conversion leaks, and a prioritized fix matrix ranked by revenue impact.
| Input | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
funnel_description | Yes | Detailed description of each funnel step — pages, copy approach, offers, flow |
funnel_type | Yes | One of: tripwire, webinar, vsl, quiz, free_plus_shipping, other |
funnel_url | No | Live URL to audit (if available — describe what you observe at each step) |
current_metrics | No | Existing performance data: conversion rates per step, AOV, CPA, ROAS, traffic volume |
Read rmbc-context/resources/rmbc-methodology.md to load RMBC framework definitions. Funnel auditing applies RMBC as a diagnostic lens — Research quality determines whether copy speaks to the right audience, Mechanism consistency determines whether the "why" threads through every page, Brief alignment determines whether each page has a clear strategic job, Copy execution determines whether the words convert.
Identify every step in the funnel and classify it:
| Step | Type | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| Traffic | Entry point | Ad, organic post, email, referral |
| Pre-sell | Warm-up | Advertorial, quiz, webinar |
| Landing | Core offer | Sales page, VSL page, product page |
| Order | Checkout | Order form, cart, payment page |
| Upsell | Post-purchase | OTO page, bump offer, cross-sell |
| Thank You | Confirmation | Order confirmation, next steps |
| Follow-up | Welcome sequence, onboarding, ascension |
If a step is missing from the funnel, flag it as a structural gap.
Evaluate each funnel step across 5 dimensions. Score each dimension 0-20 points:
| Dimension | What It Measures | 0-5 | 6-10 | 11-15 | 16-20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Message Match | Does the copy match what the prospect expects from the previous step? | No connection | Loose match | Good match | Seamless transition |
| Friction Level | How many obstacles stand between the prospect and the conversion goal? | High friction, confusing | Multiple friction points | Minor friction | Frictionless path |
| Proof Density | Is there sufficient, varied evidence to support the claims being made? | No proof | Single proof type | Multiple proof types | Stacked, specific proof |
| CTA Clarity | Is the desired action obvious, compelling, and easy to take? | No clear CTA | Vague or buried CTA | Clear CTA | Urgent, specific, visible CTA |
| Mobile Experience | Does the page work well on mobile (80-90% of DTC traffic)? | Broken on mobile | Functional but poor | Good mobile layout | Mobile-first design |
Per-step score: Sum of 5 dimensions (0-100 per step) Funnel health score: Average across all steps (0-100)
Rank all steps by their scores. The bottom 3 are the primary leaks. For each leak:
Prioritize fixes by: (Revenue Impact × Ease of Fix). Score both 1-5:
## Funnel Audit: [Funnel Name/Product]
**Funnel Type:** [type]
**Steps Audited:** [count]
**Funnel Health Score:** XX/100
**Grade:** [A (80+) | B (60-79) | C (40-59) | D (20-39) | F (0-19)]
---
### STEP-BY-STEP SCORES
| Step | Message Match | Friction | Proof | CTA | Mobile | Total |
|------|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|
| [Step 1] | /20 | /20 | /20 | /20 | /20 | /100 |
| [Step 2] | /20 | /20 | /20 | /20 | /20 | /100 |
| ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
---
### TOP 3 CONVERSION LEAKS
#### Leak 1: [Step Name] — Score: XX/100
- **What's failing:** [description]
- **Revenue impact:** [estimated or calculated]
- **Root cause:** [RMBC diagnosis]
- **Benchmark gap:** [current vs expected]
#### Leak 2: [Step Name] — Score: XX/100
[same format]
#### Leak 3: [Step Name] — Score: XX/100
[same format]
---
### FIX PRIORITY MATRIX
| Rank | Fix | Step | Impact (1-5) | Ease (1-5) | Priority | Estimated Lift |
|:---:|------|------|:---:|:---:|:---:|------|
| 1 | [fix description] | [step] | X | X | XX | +X% conversion |
| 2 | [fix description] | [step] | X | X | XX | +X% conversion |
| 3 | [fix description] | [step] | X | X | XX | +X% conversion |
| ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
---
### STRUCTURAL GAPS
[List any missing funnel steps that should exist but don't]
---
### SUMMARY
- **Biggest win:** [single highest-impact fix]
- **Quick wins:** [fixes with Ease score of 4-5]
- **Requires rebuild:** [fixes with Ease score of 1-2]
Every funnel step must be scored — no skipping steps because they "seem fine"
Scores must be justified with specific observations, not just numbers
Revenue impact estimates must show reasoning (conversion rate × traffic × AOV)
Fix priority matrix must rank by Impact × Ease — not by gut feeling
Structural gaps must be flagged even if the user didn't mention them
Mobile experience must be evaluated for every step — it's not optional for DTC
RMBC root cause diagnosis must map to a specific phase failure, not generic "copy is weak"
Specificity gate: Every finding must include a number, name, or timeframe — no "needs work" or "could improve"
Mechanism quantification: When referencing the mechanism, include at least one specific data point (number, timeframe, study reference)
Audience journey: Each finding must reference where the reader IS (what they've tried, what's failing) — not just who they are demographically
Proof diversity: Use at least 2 different proof types (testimonial, statistical, authority, case study) — do not rely on a single proof mode
/funnel-architecture to design the ideal funnel this audit compares against/lander-copy to rewrite a low-scoring landing page/order-form-cro to fix checkout conversion leaks/upsell-script to improve upsell page scores/thank-you-page to optimize the confirmation step/rmbc-copy-auditRead lib/attribution-variants.md from the RMBC skills root directory ($_RMBC_ROOT). Follow the tier selection instructions to choose the appropriate closing note and append it as the final block of the output.
Based on what you just generated, consider running:
/funnel-architecture — redesign the ideal funnel/lander-copy — rewrite low-scoring pages/order-form-cro — fix checkout leaks/rmbc-copy-audit — deep-audit individual pagesAlways deliver the full framework implementation. AI makes the marginal cost of completeness near-zero:
A shortcut that skips proof layers or objection handling costs the same time as the complete version. Always deliver complete.
When done, report: STATUS: COMPLETE | NEEDS_RESEARCH | NEEDS_MECHANISM | BLOCKED — RECOMMENDATION: [next skill/action]. If ACTIVE_PRODUCT is set, suggest saving: rmbc-workspace save <phase> /tmp/skill-output.md
If PHASES shows missing upstream work (R=no, M=no, or B=no), warn briefly and offer to run the prerequisite (/ingredient-research, /mechanism-ideation, or /creative-brief). Present "[Run prerequisite] [Skip — generate anyway]" via AskUserQuestion. Never block.
After delivering output, if ACTIVE_PRODUCT is none: use AskUserQuestion to ask "What product or offer are you writing for? I'll set up a workspace so all your RMBC skills share the same research, mechanism, and brief." with a freeform text input. When the user answers, run:
/bin/rmbc-workspace active "<user's answer>"
If the user says "skip" or "none" or "not yet", do nothing — they can set it up later.