Help us improve
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
From neuroflow
Remove AI writing signatures from prose. Makes text sound genuinely human-authored — varied rhythm, natural register, no AI tells. Use when drafting, editing, or reviewing any text that needs to read as if a person wrote it.
npx claudepluginhub stanislavjiricek/neuroflow --plugin neuroflowHow this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/neuroflow:humanizerThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
Transform AI-generated prose into text that reads as if a human wrote it. This goes beyond cutting filler — it addresses rhythm, register, word choice, and the structural patterns that mark AI output as synthetic.
Mandates invoking relevant skills via tools before any response in coding sessions. Covers access, priorities, and adaptations for Claude Code, Copilot CLI, Gemini CLI.
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
Transform AI-generated prose into text that reads as if a human wrote it. This goes beyond cutting filler — it addresses rhythm, register, word choice, and the structural patterns that mark AI output as synthetic.
Remove every word and phrase that signals machine authorship. No exceptions.
Word blacklist — replace or cut entirely:
| Banned word / phrase | Why it's a tell |
|---|---|
| delve, delving | No human writes "delve" unless they're writing a fantasy novel |
| comprehensive, robust, nuanced | Vague intensifiers that pad without adding meaning |
| crucial, pivotal, vital, essential | Overused AI emphasis words |
| seamlessly, effortlessly | Fake smoothness |
| leverage (as a verb) | Corporate-AI hybrid; use "use" or "apply" |
| notably, importantly, significantly | AI throat-clearing before a point |
| transformative, groundbreaking, revolutionary | Unjustified superlatives |
| in the realm of, in the landscape of | Pompous filler |
| it is worth noting, it is important to note | Cut entirely; just state the note |
| this highlights, this underscores, this demonstrates | Tell the reader what it shows, don't announce that it shows it |
| the [noun] landscape | Cliché geography metaphor |
| moving forward, going forward | Corporate filler |
| at the end of the day | Cliché |
| em dash (—) | Overused by AI; replace with comma, colon, or period |
Structural blacklist:
| Pattern | Replace with |
|---|---|
X not only A but also B | X does A and B — or split into two sentences |
While X, Y (contrast opener) | Rewrite without "while" — state X and Y as separate facts |
Not X — it's Y contrasts | State Y directly; cut the negation |
| Three-part lists with parallel structure | Two items or prose; three identical grammatical units sound robotic |
| Sentences starting with "It is" / "There is" / "There are" | Rewrite with a concrete subject |
| Paragraph ending with punchy one-liner summary | Vary the ending; not every paragraph needs a mic-drop |
| Wh- sentence openers ("What this means is…") | Restructure |
AI prose is metronomic. Every sentence is roughly the same length. Every paragraph has the same arc. Break it.
Rules:
Match the register to the context — but always push toward natural.
Academic writing:
Grant / proposal writing:
General prose:
The goal is not to homogenize. It is to remove machine patterns while keeping what makes the writing individual.
Run through each line:
Rate 1–10 on each dimension. Below 35/50: revise.
| Dimension | Question |
|---|---|
| Naturalness | Does this read like a specific person's prose? |
| Rhythm | Varied, or metronomic? |
| Humanity | Free of AI tells? |
| Voice | Distinct, or generic? |
| Density | Any word that could be cut? |