Skill

reviewing-architecture

From pda

Evaluates code design quality including SOLID principles, modularity, coupling/cohesion, dependency management, and scalability. Use when performing an architecture review, design review, or as part of code-review.

Install

npx claudepluginhub spaghetti-lover/pda-plugins --plugin pda

Tool Access

This skill uses the workspace's default tool permissions.

Preview

Evaluate architectural quality of code changes.

SKILL.md

Similar Skills

cache-components

Guides Next.js Cache Components and Partial Prerendering (PPR) with cacheComponents enabled. Implements 'use cache', cacheLife(), cacheTag(), revalidateTag(), static/dynamic optimization, and cache debugging.

cache-components

139.1k

claude-opus-4-5-migration

2 files

Migrates code, prompts, and API calls from Claude Sonnet 4.0/4.5 or Opus 4.1 to Opus 4.5, updating model strings on Anthropic, AWS, GCP, Azure platforms.

claude-opus-4-5-migration

83.2k

claude-code-plugin-release

1 file

Automates semantic versioning and release workflow for Claude Code plugins: bumps versions in package.json, marketplace.json, plugin.json; verifies builds; creates git tags, GitHub releases, changelogs.

claude-mem

64.7k

Stats

Stars0

Forks0

Last CommitApr 13, 2026

Actions

View Source View Plugin View on GitHub View README

Architecture Review

Evaluate architectural quality of code changes.

Scope

Specific files/paths if given

git diff for PR/branch

Staged/unstaged changes if no scope specified

Checklist

SOLID violations — single responsibility, open/closed, liskov, interface segregation, dependency inversion

DRY violations — duplicated logic (flag at 3+ repetitions or when it creates maintenance risk)

God objects/functions — classes or functions doing too many things

Separation of concerns — business logic mixed with IO, presentation mixed with data access, scattered cross-cutting concerns

Circular dependencies between modules

Coupling — high-level modules depending on low-level details, tight coupling to external libs without abstraction

Code organization — files in wrong directories, inconsistent naming, public API surface too large

Scalability — hardcoded values, missing extensibility points, API design issues

Classification

Per finding: Impact (HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW), Type (SOLID_VIOLATION/COUPLING/COHESION/MODULARITY/SCALABILITY/ORGANIZATION), Effort to fix (HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW).

Output format

### [IMPACT] Title - **File**: `path:line` - **Type**: CATEGORY - **Effort**: HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW - **Description**: issue and principle violated - **Current pattern**: snippet - **Recommendation**: how to restructure

Summary

End with impact counts table and top 1-3 highest-impact actionable improvements.

Architecture Review

Evaluate architectural quality of code changes.

Scope

Specific files/paths if given
git diff for PR/branch
Staged/unstaged changes if no scope specified

Checklist

SOLID violations — single responsibility, open/closed, liskov, interface segregation, dependency inversion
DRY violations — duplicated logic (flag at 3+ repetitions or when it creates maintenance risk)
God objects/functions — classes or functions doing too many things
Separation of concerns — business logic mixed with IO, presentation mixed with data access, scattered cross-cutting concerns
Circular dependencies between modules
Coupling — high-level modules depending on low-level details, tight coupling to external libs without abstraction
Code organization — files in wrong directories, inconsistent naming, public API surface too large
Scalability — hardcoded values, missing extensibility points, API design issues

Classification

Per finding: Impact (HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW), Type (SOLID_VIOLATION/COUPLING/COHESION/MODULARITY/SCALABILITY/ORGANIZATION), Effort to fix (HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW).

Output format

### [IMPACT] Title
- **File**: `path:line`
- **Type**: CATEGORY
- **Effort**: HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW
- **Description**: issue and principle violated
- **Current pattern**: snippet
- **Recommendation**: how to restructure

Summary

End with impact counts table and top 1-3 highest-impact actionable improvements.