Help us improve
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
From antigravity-awesome-skills
Generates structured PR descriptions from git diffs with categorized changes, review checklists, risk assessments, and test summaries. Use for PR reviews and diff documentation.
npx claudepluginhub sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills --plugin antigravity-awesome-skillsHow this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/antigravity-awesome-skills:comprehensive-review-pr-enhanceThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
- You need to turn a git diff into a reviewer-friendly pull request description.
Generates structured PR descriptions from git diffs with change categories, risk assessments, test coverage summaries, and review checklists.
Writes structured PR descriptions from git diffs, commit lists, or branch summaries. Formats output with summary, motivation, changes, testing steps, and reviewer guidance.
Guides technical evaluation of code review feedback: read fully, restate for understanding, verify against codebase, respond with reasoning or pushback before implementing.
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
git diff <base>...HEAD --stat to identify changed files and scope## Summary
<!-- one-paragraph executive summary: what changed and why -->
## Changes
| Category | Files | Key change |
|----------|-------|------------|
| source | `src/auth.ts` | added OAuth2 PKCE flow |
| test | `tests/auth.test.ts` | covers token refresh edge case |
| config | `.env.example` | new `OAUTH_CLIENT_ID` var |
## Why
<!-- link to issue/ticket + one sentence on motivation -->
## Testing
- [ ] unit tests pass (`npm test`)
- [ ] manual smoke test on staging
- [ ] no coverage regression
## Risks & Rollback
- **Breaking?** yes / no
- **Rollback**: revert this commit; no migration needed
- **Risk level**: low / medium / high — because ___
Add checklist sections only when the matching file category appears in the diff:
| File category | Checklist items |
|---|---|
| source | no debug statements, functions <50 lines, descriptive names, error handling |
| test | meaningful assertions, edge cases, no flaky tests, AAA pattern |
| config | no hardcoded secrets, env vars documented, backwards compatible |
| docs | accurate, examples included, changelog updated |
security-sensitive (auth, crypto, token, password in path) | input validation, no secrets in logs, authz correct |
When diff exceeds 20 files or 1000 lines, suggest splitting by feature area:
git checkout -b feature/part-1
git cherry-pick <commits-for-part-1>
resources/implementation-playbook.md — Python helpers for automated PR analysis, coverage reports, and risk scoring