lgtm

LGTM

You can't see edits the user made outside the conversation. So before the next step, act on evidence of what's on disk now — not on belief about what you wrote there. Your in-context copy is belief; so is your certainty that nothing changed. Neither earns the right to skip a re-read — re-reading from disk does.

A cheap, objective check of which files changed can narrow that work, but it counts as evidence only when it's real. It must be fresh — run now, after the user finished reviewing; a git status you remember from earlier predates their edits, so it's belief, not evidence. And it speaks only for what it tracks: use git status (a bare git diff misses staged and untracked changes), and read its silence about a file — new, untracked, gitignored, or outside the repo — as "unseen," not "unchanged."

So skip a reviewed file only where a fresh check positively vouches it's unchanged; re-read every other one — and with no such check, re-read them all. For just a file or two, skip the check — re-reading them outright is cheaper.

• Can't tell which files were under review? Ask.
• Nothing under review was a file — it lived only in chat? Nothing to re-read; just proceed.

Don't make a ceremony of it — re-read what the evidence points to, then continue.