Help us improve
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
From wipnote
Diagnose bugs, errors, and issues with root cause analysis. Use when asked to diagnose, debug, investigate, or find root cause of any problem — whether a wipnote bug ID, error message, unexpected behavior, or delegation audit.
npx claudepluginhub shakestzd/wipnote --plugin wipnoteHow this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/wipnote:diagnoseThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
General-purpose diagnostic skill for investigating bugs, errors, and unexpected behavior.
Provides behavioral guidelines to reduce common LLM coding mistakes, focusing on simplicity, surgical changes, assumption surfacing, and verifiable success criteria.
Searches, retrieves, and installs Agent Skills from prompts.chat registry using MCP tools like search_skills and get_skill. Activates for finding skills, browsing catalogs, or extending Claude.
Guides systematic root-cause debugging when tests fail, builds break, or unexpected errors occur. Provides a structured triage checklist to preserve evidence, localize, and fix issues instead of guessing.
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
General-purpose diagnostic skill for investigating bugs, errors, and unexpected behavior.
/wipnote:diagnose <bug-id> # Investigate a specific bug
/wipnote:diagnose <error or symptom> # Investigate an error or behavior
/wipnote:diagnose --delegation # Audit delegation compliance (legacy mode)
Trigger on:
bug-5126e3cfAll diagnostic work must be attributed:
wipnote bug start <bug-id> before investigatingwipnote bug create "Error: description" --track <trk-id> then start itwipnote help for available commandsIf given a bug ID (matches bug-*):
wipnote bug start <bug-id>wipnote bug show <bug-id>If given an error message or symptom:
wipnote bug create "<summary>" --track <trk-id> then wipnote bug start <id>If --delegation flag:
If no arguments:
wipnote recommend --top 3Dispatch Task(subagent_type="wipnote:researcher") with a structured prompt:
## Bug: <bug-id> — <title>
### Symptom
<description from bug or user>
### Investigation Steps
1. Search codebase for relevant code paths
2. Read the source files involved
3. Identify the root cause with file paths and line numbers
4. Check if the issue affects other cases beyond the reported one
5. Query SQLite or run CLI commands to verify current state
6. Propose a fix (describe what to change, don't implement)
### Report Format
- **Root cause**: What's wrong and where (file:line)
- **Blast radius**: Does this affect other cases?
- **Suggested fix**: What code change resolves it
- **Verification**: How to confirm the fix works
After the agent reports back, present findings to the user in this format:
## Diagnosis: <bug-id>
**Root cause:** <one-line summary>
**Location:** `<file>:<line>`
**Blast radius:** <scope of impact>
### Details
<agent's detailed findings>
### Suggested Fix
<what to change>
### Next Steps
- [ ] Implement fix
- [ ] Run tests: `go test ./...`
- [ ] Verify: <specific verification command>
When --delegation is specified, audit the current session's delegation compliance:
wipnote status
sqlite3 .wipnote/wipnote.db "
SELECT tool_name, COUNT(*) as count
FROM agent_events
WHERE session_id = (SELECT session_id FROM agent_events ORDER BY timestamp DESC LIMIT 1)
GROUP BY tool_name ORDER BY count DESC;
"
Compute score: delegations / (delegations + direct_impl + git_writes) * 100
Present report:
## Delegation Diagnostic
### Score: X% (N/M actions delegated)
### Gaps Found
| Time | Tool | Action | Should Use |
|------|------|--------|------------|
| ... | ... | ... | ... |
### Recommendations
1. ...