From development-skills
Compares Claude Code and Codex on identical code-change tasks using isolated worktrees, identical gates, transcripts, time, and cost.
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/development-skills:ai-agent-benchThis skill is limited to the following tools:
The summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
Compare agents only with the same task, starting commit, and outcome check. The harness preserves result branches and removes temporary worktrees.
Compare agents only with the same task, starting commit, and outcome check. The harness preserves result branches and removes temporary worktrees.
Create <repo>/.agent-bench.toml:
prompt = "prompts/task.md"
start_branch = "main" # or start_commit
agents = ["claude", "codex"]
outer_check = "./scripts/full_check.sh"
inner_check = "pytest tests/integration/test_x.py -q"
outer_check proves the real outcome before and after, and measures wall time. inner_check gives agents fast feedback.
Require a clean repo, available CLIs, and a passing outer_check. Confirm agents and run ID, then run trials sequentially to avoid load-biased timing:
python <skill>/scripts/run_trial.py --repo "$REPO" --config "$REPO/.agent-bench.toml" --agent "$AGENT" --run "$RUN_ID"
Results go to eval-results/<task>/<agent>/run-<id>-<timestamp>/. Record unexpected behavior in ai-agent-bench-anomalies.md per anomalies.
Aggregate with scripts/parse_transcript.py --aggregate <run-dirs> --output comparison.json --render-report comparison.md. Report gates, branches, time delta, tokens, and cost. Never rank a failed trial.
For plugin behavior rather than a real code task, use the bounded Pydantic runner documented by eval-regression and scripts/run_evals.py.
Never commit on the user's branch. A repeated run creates a new timestamped result and preserves prior evidence.
npx claudepluginhub reidemeister94/development-skills --plugin development-skillsCreates, edits, and verifies skills using a test-driven development approach with pressure scenarios and subagents.