From agent-almanac
Synthesizes multi-domain observations from expand-awareness into a coherent gestalt by mapping tensions and resonances, identifying emergent insights, and articulating them in a single unifying sentence. Use before express-insight.
npx claudepluginhub pjt222/agent-almanacThis skill is limited to using the following tools:
Form a coherent whole from the panoramic perception produced by `expand-awareness` — not by averaging, compromising, or selecting the best domain's answer, but by identifying the emergent pattern that could not have arisen from any single perspective alone.
Orchestrates 5-step synoptic cycle (meditate, expand-awareness, observe, awareness, integrate-gestalt, express-insight) for panoramic multi-domain synthesis producing unified understanding. Use when problems span 3+ domains and interactions matter, before architectural decisions.
Synthesizes information from multiple sources into coherent insights and applies analogical reasoning to transfer knowledge across domains. Useful for literature reviews, stakeholder feedback integration, conflict reconciliation, pattern identification, explanatory analogies, and cross-domain solutions.
Recommends analytical lenses or assembles AI teams for multi-perspective analysis when no framework exists, producing a framed inquiry. Activates on framework-absent inquiries.
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
Form a coherent whole from the panoramic perception produced by expand-awareness — not by averaging, compromising, or selecting the best domain's answer, but by identifying the emergent pattern that could not have arisen from any single perspective alone.
expand-awareness has surfaced raw perception from multiple domains and the observations need to become a unified insightexpress-insight, which requires a formed gestalt as its inputexpand-awareness (or equivalent panoramic perception)For each pair of domains identified in the panoramic perception, characterize how they relate. The three possible relationships are tension (they disagree), resonance (they reinforce from different angles), and orthogonality (they address unrelated aspects).
Use the tension-resonance map:
Tension-Resonance Map
+-------------------+-------------------+-------------------------------+
| Domain Pair | Relationship | Detail |
+-------------------+-------------------+-------------------------------+
| A vs B | tension / | |
| | resonance / | |
| | orthogonal | |
| Evidence: | | What specifically disagrees, |
| | | reinforces, or is unrelated? |
| Implication: | | What does this relationship |
| | | suggest for the whole? |
+-------------------+-------------------+-------------------------------+
| A vs C | ... | ... |
+-------------------+-------------------+-------------------------------+
| B vs C | ... | ... |
+-------------------+-------------------+-------------------------------+
Fill one row for every domain pair. For N domains there are N(N-1)/2 pairs. If this exceeds ten rows, group related domains first and map between groups.
Prioritize tensions — they carry the most integrative information. Resonances confirm; orthogonalities can be set aside; but tensions demand resolution, and the gestalt is found in how they resolve.
Expected: A completed tension-resonance map where every domain pair has a characterized relationship with specific evidence. At least one genuine tension is identified — if there are no tensions, the domains may not be different enough to produce emergence.
On failure: If all pairs show resonance, the domains are agreeing at a surface level. Dig deeper: where do they agree for different reasons? Agreement-for-different-reasons is a hidden tension. If no relationships can be characterized, the panoramic perception from expand-awareness may be too shallow — return and deepen the domain-specific observations before attempting integration.
In Gestalt psychology, the figure emerges from the ground. The ground is the tension-resonance map from Step 1. The figure is the dominant pattern that unifies the most domains with the fewest contradictions.
Signs the figure is emerging:
Expected: One or two candidate figures articulated as single sentences. Each candidate recontextualizes the domain observations rather than selecting among them. The candidate accounts for at least the major tensions in the map.
On failure: If no figure emerges, the integration may be premature. Two recovery paths: (a) return to expand-awareness and add a domain that was missing — sometimes the figure cannot form because a key perspective is absent; (b) sit with the tensions without forcing resolution — some gestalts need incubation rather than effort. Note the current state and return later.
The candidate gestalt from Step 2 must survive three tests before it is accepted.
Test A — Tension accounting: Walk through every tension from Step 1. Does the gestalt resolve it, reframe it, or explicitly acknowledge it as an irreducible trade-off? Unaddressed tensions indicate a premature gestalt.
Test B — Single-domain origin: Could this insight have come from within a single domain? If a domain specialist would nod and say "yes, we already knew that," the gestalt has collapsed back into a domain answer. A true gestalt surprises every domain — each recognizes its contribution but not the whole.
Test C — Coherence under rotation: Mentally approach the gestalt from each domain's perspective in turn. Does it hold its shape, or does it look different depending on which domain you view it from? A robust gestalt is the same insight viewed from any angle; a fragile one changes meaning under rotation.
Scoring:
Expected: The candidate gestalt passes all three tests, or the failure mode is clearly identified and guides a return to Step 2.
On failure: If the candidate fails repeatedly after multiple iterations, consider that the domains may not form a natural gestalt for this problem. Not every multi-domain observation produces emergence — sometimes the honest answer is a structured list of domain perspectives with their tensions mapped. Deliver the tension-resonance map as the output rather than forcing a false unity.
Articulate the gestalt in a single sentence that a domain specialist would not have written from within their domain alone. This sentence is the deliverable.
The named insight, together with its provenance, becomes the input to express-insight for communication.
Expected: A single sentence capturing the gestalt, accompanied by a brief provenance paragraph. The sentence passes the "no single domain" test. Reading it, a practitioner of any contributing domain recognizes their field's contribution but could not have arrived at the statement alone.
On failure: If the sentence keeps collapsing into domain language, try the negation test: state what the gestalt is NOT. "This is not a security recommendation, and not a performance optimization, and not an architectural pattern — it is [the gestalt]." The negations clear the domain frames and create space for the emergent formulation.
expand-awareness — produces the raw panoramic perception that this skill integrates; always precedes integrate-gestaltexpress-insight — communicates the formed gestalt to its audience; always follows integrate-gestaltbuild-coherence — selects between competing options using structured evaluation; integrate-gestalt forms a new whole rather than choosing among existing optionsbrahma-bhaga — creates from void; integrate-gestalt creates from abundance (multiple filled perspectives)meditate — clears prior context to enable clean perception; useful before expand-awareness, which precedes this skillcoordinate-reasoning — manages information flow in multi-path evaluation; complementary when the gestalt involves coordinating multiple reasoning threads