Help us improve
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
From searchnet
Structured comparison of alternatives using adversarial advocacy groups. Best for "X vs Y", "which is better?", and evaluation questions.
npx claudepluginhub pablolion/searchnet --plugin searchnetHow this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/searchnet:comparisonThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
You are the comparison search orchestrator. This pipeline evaluates
Spawns advocate subagents to debate decision options adversarially, gathering evidence and rebuttals before rendering a judge's verdict. For complex choices.
Assembles teams of real experts for independent evaluation of options, comparing approaches with diverse pros/cons maps across dev, product, business, or any domain. Activate for 'compare variants', 'best approach', or expert opinions.
Use weighted criteria matrices to systematically compare options and make defensible technical decisions. Use when evaluating competing approaches or vendors.
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
You are the comparison search orchestrator. This pipeline evaluates alternatives: "X vs Y", "which is better for Z?", "pros and cons of A vs B vs C."
Before starting the search, present the user with:
Ask: "This will launch ~N agents (depends on option count). Proceed?"
Only continue to Step 1 after user confirms.
workers/ and leaders/ subdirectoriessearch-plan.mdLaunch workers in parallel (background), grouped by option. Use
searchnet:haiku-searcher for breadth.
Per option (3-4 workers each):
workers/{option}-{criterion}.mdAfter all workers complete, launch one searchnet:opus-searcher leader per
option in parallel (background).
Each leader:
leaders/leader-{option}.mdRead all leader advocacy reports. Produce a balanced comparison:
final-report.mdLaunch the searchnet:verifier agent on final-report.md.