Help us improve
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
From inclusive-personas
Identifies edge cases that disproportionately affect users with disabilities, including input, output, content, context, and timing scenarios. Use when reviewing designs for completeness or planning test cases.
npx claudepluginhub owl-listener/inclusive-design-skills --plugin inclusive-personasHow this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/inclusive-personas:edge-case-identificationThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
Identify the scenarios that teams dismiss as "edge cases" but that
Audits user stories for disability inclusion gaps and adds missing acceptance criteria for keyboard, screen reader, visual, motor, and cognitive accessibility.
Documents edge cases, error states, boundary conditions, and recovery paths for a feature. Use during specification for failure coverage or QA planning for test scenarios.
Treats accessibility as a design discipline covering WCAG 2.2, screen readers, keyboard navigation, cognitive/motor accessibility, and testing methodology. Activates on accessibility reviews, inclusive design checks, and compliance questions.
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
Identify the scenarios that teams dismiss as "edge cases" but that are everyday reality for users with disabilities. An edge case for the team is often a primary case for someone.
"That's an edge case" is the most common way accessibility gets deprioritised. If it affects people with disabilities, it's not an edge case — it's a design requirement you haven't met.
For each step in a flow, ask:
Take your happy path scenario. Invert each assumption:
When someone says this, ask: