Stats
Actions
Tags
Help us improve
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
Assesses cognitive load across three dimensions (intrinsic, extraneous, germane) with a structured framework and reduction strategies. Use when reviewing dashboards, forms, multi-step flows, or information-dense screens.
npx claudepluginhub owl-listener/inclusive-design-skills --plugin cognitive-accessibilityHow this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/cognitive-accessibility:cognitive-load-assessmentThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
Assess cognitive load across three dimensions and provide actionable
Maps cognitive load across multi-step processes (checkout, onboarding, applications). Rates each step, flags load spikes and memory bridges, and recommends design changes to reduce friction.
Evaluates cognitive load types, wayfinding, focus management, and decision complexity in interfaces for users with cognitive differences, stress, or divided attention.
Applies cognitive load theory to simplify complex information, chunk content, and reduce working memory burden for learning design, communication, or system architecture.
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
Assess cognitive load across three dimensions and provide actionable recommendations to reduce unnecessary burden on users.
Intrinsic load — complexity inherent in the task itself. A tax return is intrinsically complex. You cannot simplify the tax code. Focus: break into manageable steps, provide context, explain terms.
Extraneous load — complexity added by the design, not the task. Confusing navigation, unclear labels, inconsistent patterns, visual clutter. Focus: eliminate ruthlessly. Every instance is a fixable design failure.
Germane load — effort invested in the actual task. This is the load you WANT. The user engaging with their real goal. Focus: maximise this by removing the other two.
For each screen or step, evaluate:
| Dimension | Low (good) | Medium (review) | High (redesign) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Decisions required | 0–1 | 2–3 | 4+ |
| Items to remember | None | 1–2 | 3+ |
| New concepts to learn | None | 1 | 2+ |
| Steps to complete | 1–2 | 3–5 | 6+ |
| Reading complexity | Plain language | Some jargon | Dense/technical |
| Visual complexity | Clean, focused | Moderate | Cluttered |
If any dimension rates High, that screen needs redesign before launch.
Present the assessment as a screen-by-screen table showing load ratings, followed by prioritised recommendations sorted by impact.