review

Accessible Content Review

Run a comprehensive review of content accessibility — covering structure, language, images, links, tables, forms, and multimedia.

Process

Phase 1: Structure Check

Using heading-structure, verify the document outline:

• One H1, no skipped levels, headings describe content
• Someone reading only headings would understand the page

Phase 2: Readability Check

Using readable-content, assess the text:

• Reading level appropriate to audience
• Sentences under 20 words, paragraphs under 4 sentences
• Most important information first
• Scannable with headings, bold, and lists

Phase 3: Image and Media Check

Using alt-text-design and multimedia-accessibility, review:

• Every image has appropriate alt text (or empty alt for decorative)
• Complex images have extended descriptions
• Video has captions, audio has transcripts
• Media players are keyboard accessible

Phase 4: Link and Navigation Check

Using link-text-design, verify:

• All link text makes sense out of context
• No generic "click here" or "read more"
• File links state type and size

Phase 5: Table and Form Check

Using table-accessibility and form-labelling, review:

• Tables have headers, captions, and responsive behaviour
• Forms have visible labels, grouping, and error association
• No placeholder-only labels

Output

Present findings as:

1. Summary — overall content accessibility rating
2. Issue list — each issue with location, type, severity, and fix
3. Quick wins — issues that can be fixed in under 5 minutes each
4. Structural issues — problems that need redesign or rewriting

Severity definitions:

• Critical — content is inaccessible to one or more user groups
• Major — content is difficult to access or understand
• Minor — content could be improved but is functional