From nw
Provides markdown templates for research docs and distillation workflow to transform research into skills, enforcing quality standards and evidence verification.
npx claudepluginhub nwave-ai/nwave --plugin nwThis skill uses the workspace's default tool permissions.
Use for all research documents in `docs/research/`.
Indexes deep research principle skills for methodology, source evaluation, hallucination prevention, and synthesis-reporting; provides /research command for orchestrated multi-agent web research with verification.
Conducts multi-angle research on topics with evidence requirements, confidence levels, gap identification, and structured Markdown reports saved to files. For dual-verification and comprehensive exploration.
Executes multi-agent research pipeline on any topic with Scout, Investigators, Deep Diver, Verifier, Synthesizer, and Critic reviews to produce verified, sourced reports.
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
Use for all research documents in docs/research/.
# Research: {Topic}
**Date**: {ISO-8601} | **Researcher**: nw-researcher (Nova) | **Confidence**: {High/Medium/Low} | **Sources**: {count}
## Executive Summary
{2-3 paragraph overview of key findings, main insights, and overall conclusion}
## Research Methodology
**Search Strategy**: {how sources were found}
**Source Selection**: Types: {academic/official/industry/technical_docs} | Reputation: {high/medium-high min} | Verification: {cross-referencing approach}
**Quality Standards**: Target 3 sources/claim (min 1 authoritative) | All major claims cross-referenced | Avg reputation: {0.0-1.0}
## Findings
### Finding 1: {Descriptive Title}
**Evidence**: "{Direct quote or specific data point}"
**Source**: [{Source Name}]({URL}) - Accessed {YYYY-MM-DD}
**Confidence**: {High/Medium/Low}
**Verification**: [{Source 2}]({URL2}), [{Source 3}]({URL3})
**Analysis**: {Brief interpretation or context}
{Repeat Finding structure as needed}
## Source Analysis
| Source | Domain | Reputation | Type | Access Date | Cross-verified |
|--------|--------|------------|------|-------------|----------------|
| {name} | {domain} | {High/Medium-High/Medium} | {academic/official/industry/technical} | {YYYY-MM-DD} | {Y/N} |
Reputation: High: {count} ({%}) | Medium-high: {count} ({%}) | Avg: {0.0-1.0}
## Knowledge Gaps
### Gap 1: {Description}
**Issue**: {missing/unclear info} | **Attempted**: {sources searched} | **Recommendation**: {how to address}
## Conflicting Information (if applicable)
### Conflict 1: {Topic}
**Position A**: {Statement} — Source: [{Name}]({URL}), Reputation: {score}, Evidence: {quote}
**Position B**: {Contradictory statement} — Source: [{Name}]({URL}), Reputation: {score}, Evidence: {quote}
**Assessment**: {Which source more authoritative and why}
## Recommendations for Further Research
1. {Specific recommendation with rationale}
## Full Citations
[1] {Author}. "{Title}". {Publication}. {Date}. {URL}. Accessed {YYYY-MM-DD}.
## Research Metadata
Duration: {X min} | Examined: {count} | Cited: {count} | Cross-refs: {count} | Confidence: High {%}, Medium {%}, Low {%} | Output: docs/research/{filename}
When creating a skill (via *create-skill or skill_for specified):
Execute comprehensive research, create full doc in docs/research/{category}/{topic}-comprehensive-research.md, complete quality gates.
~/.claude/skills/nw-{skill-name}/SKILL.md{topic}-methodology.mdVerify all essential concepts present | Confirm practitioner focus | Check self-containment
Source requirements adapt to available turn budget:
When budget runs low, prioritize BREADTH (cover all claims with minimum sources) over DEPTH (exhaust sources for one claim while ignoring others).
Additional requirements: