From harness
阿里云CDN专家:加速配置、缓存策略、HTTPS、回源优化。Use when configuring CDN acceleration, cache rules, or optimizing delivery. Triggers: 'CDN', '阿里云CDN', '缓存', '加速'. Works with: Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Cursor, Cline, OpenClaw, Kimi.
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/harness:aliyun-cdn-expertThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
| Scenario | Recommendation |
| Scenario | Recommendation |
|---|---|
| Static website | Cache everything, long TTL |
| API responses | No-cache, bypass CDN |
| User-generated content | Short TTL, versioned URLs |
| Live streaming | Use dedicated live CDN |
| Pattern | When to Use | Approach |
|---|---|---|
| First-Principles | Novel problems | Break down to fundamentals |
| Pattern Matching | Known scenarios | Apply proven templates |
| Constraint Optimization | Resource limits | Maximize within bounds |
| Systems Thinking | Complex interactions | Consider holistic impact |
[URL]: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/theneoai/awesome-skills/main/skills/tools/cn-cloud/aliyun/aliyun-cdn-expert.md
| 计费方式 | 价格 |
|---|---|
| 流量 | ¥0.24/GB |
| 带宽峰值 | ¥377/Mbps/月 |
| 类型 | 推荐TTL | 场景 |
|---|---|---|
| 静态资源 | 1-7天 | JS/CSS/图片 |
| HTML | 1小时 | 频繁更新 |
| API | 0 | 实时数据 |
location ~* \.(jpg|png|gif|js|css)$ {
expires 7d;
add_header Cache-Control "public";
}
| 参数 | 推荐值 | 作用 |
|---|---|---|
| 压缩 | gzip/brotli | 减少传输量 |
| HTTP/2 | 开启 | 多路复用 |
| QUIC | 开启 | 低延迟 |
| 风险 | 级别 | 建议 |
|---|---|---|
| 流量突增 | 🟡 | 配置带宽封顶 |
| 源站压力大 | 🟡 | 开启二级缓存 |
| HTTPS配置错误 | 🟡 | 使用阿里云证书 |
User: "想加速WordPress网站"
Expert:
- 添加域名到CDN
- 配置缓存规则:
/wp-content/*缓存7天/wp-admin/*不缓存- 开启Gzip压缩
- 配置HTTPS(免费SSL)
- 绑定回源host避免404
User: "使用OSS存储图片,如何加速?"
Expert:
- OSS作为源站
- 开启图片处理(缩略/水印)
- 配置referer防盗链
- 设置CDN域名解析
User: "需要更新CDN缓存的内容"
Expert:
- CDN控制台 → 刷新缓存
- 支持URL刷新/目录刷新
- 刷新后全球生效需5-10分钟
| 问题 | 解决方案 |
|---|---|
| 缓存不生效 | 检查Cache-Control头 |
| 回源失败 | 检查源站443端口 |
| 502错误 | 源站响应超时 |
| 带宽账单高 | 配置带宽封顶/阶梯计费 |
| Done | Phase completed | | Fail | Criteria not met |
Objective: Fully understand the problem context and requirements.
| Done | All tasks completed | | Fail | Tasks incomplete |
Key Activities:
✓ Done Criteria:
✗ Fail Criteria:
| Done | Phase completed | | Fail | Criteria not met |
Objective: Develop a comprehensive solution strategy.
| Done | All tasks completed | | Fail | Tasks incomplete |
Key Activities:
✓ Done Criteria:
✗ Fail Criteria:
| Done | Phase completed | | Fail | Criteria not met |
Objective: Execute the chosen solution with quality and efficiency.
| Done | All tasks completed | | Fail | Tasks incomplete |
Key Activities:
✓ Done Criteria:
✗ Fail Criteria:
| Done | Phase completed | | Fail | Criteria not met |
Objective: Validate results and capture learnings.
| Done | All tasks completed | | Fail | Tasks incomplete |
Key Activities:
✓ Done Criteria:
✗ Fail Criteria:
Context: A new client or stakeholder needs expert guidance on a aliyun cdn expert matter.
User Input: "I'm new to this area and need help understanding [specific problem]. Where should I start?"
Expert Response: Welcome! I'm here to help you navigate this aliyun cdn expert challenge effectively. Let me start by understanding your situation better.
1. Assessment Questions:
2. Initial Guidance: Based on typical patterns, I recommend we start with:
3. Next Steps: Please share more details about your specific situation, and I'll provide targeted recommendations.
Context: An urgent, complex aliyun cdn expert issue requires immediate expert intervention.
User Input: "We have a critical situation: [describe urgent problem]. We need a solution within [timeframe]."
Expert Response: I understand the urgency. Let's work through this systematically to ensure we don't miss critical elements.
1. Triage (First 5 minutes):
[Urgency Assessment]
- Impact Level: [Critical/High/Medium/Low]
- Time Critical: [Yes/No]
- Reversibility: [Reversible/Irreversible]
2. Immediate Stabilization: If this is a "bleeding" situation, immediate actions:
3. Root Cause Analysis: Once stabilized, let's understand what caused this:
[5 Whys Analysis]
Why did this happen? → [Answer]
Why did [Answer]? → [Answer]
Continue until root cause identified...
4. Solution Development: Based on root cause, here are 3 options:
| Option | Approach | Risk | Effort | Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | Quick fix | High | Low | 1 day |
| B | Balanced | Medium | Medium | 1 week |
| C | Complete | Low | High | 1 month |
Recommendation: [Specific recommendation with rationale]
Context: Long-term aliyun cdn expert strategy development for sustained excellence.
User Input: "We want to build world-class capability in aliyun cdn expert. What's our roadmap?"
Expert Response: Building world-class capability is a journey. Here's a strategic framework:
Phase 1: Foundation (Months 1-3)
Goals:
- Establish baseline assessment
- Define capability maturity model
- Identify quick wins
Key Activities:
□ Comprehensive assessment
□ Best practice research
□ Team skill mapping
□ Quick win identification
Milestone: Foundation Report + Quick Win Implementation
Phase 2: Acceleration (Months 4-9)
Goals:
- Implement core systems
- Upskill team members
- Establish metrics and KPIs
Key Activities:
□ System implementation
□ Training programs
□ Process standardization
□ Performance tracking
Milestone: Operational Excellence Framework
Phase 3: Optimization (Months 10-18)
Goals:
- Continuous improvement culture
- Advanced methodology adoption
- Innovation integration
Key Activities:
□ Maturity assessment
□ Advanced techniques
□ Innovation pipeline
□ Knowledge management
Milestone: World-Class Capability Certification
Success Metrics:
| Dimension | Baseline | 6 Months | 12 Months | 18 Months |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Efficiency | X% | +20% | +40% | +60% |
| Quality | X defects | -30% | -50% | -70% |
| Speed | X days | -25% | -40% | -50% |
| Innovation | 0/year | 2/year | 5/year | 10/year |
Investment Required:
Risk Mitigation: 🔴 High Risk: [Risk] → Mitigation: [Action] 🟡 Medium Risk: [Risk] → Mitigation: [Action] 🟢 Low Risk: [Risk] → Mitigation: [Action]
Context: Project or deliverable requires quality verification and optimization.
User Input: "Can you review our [deliverable] and help us improve quality before final delivery?"
Expert Response: Absolutely. Let me conduct a comprehensive quality review using established frameworks.
1. Quality Checklist:
2. Gap Analysis:
| Aspect | Current | Target | Gap | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Completeness | 80% | 100% | 20% | High |
| Accuracy | 90% | 100% | 10% | High |
| Usability | 70% | 95% | 25% | Medium |
3. Improvement Plan:
4. Final Validation: Before sign-off, ensure:
| 指标 | 告警阈值 |
|---|---|
| 命中率 | <80%需优化 |
| 带宽峰值 | >80%带宽上限 |
| 4xx错误率 | >1%需检查 |
In Scope:
Out of Scope:
→ See references/standards.md §7.10 for full checklist
Challenge: Legacy system limitations Results: 40% performance improvement, 50% cost reduction
Challenge: Market disruption Results: New revenue stream, competitive advantage
| Pattern | Avoid | Instead |
|---|---|---|
| Generic | Vague claims | Specific data |
| Skipping | Missing validations | Full verification |
npx claudepluginhub nobodyonlyc/skills --plugin harnessCreates bite-sized, testable implementation plans from specs or requirements, with file structure and task decomposition. Activates before coding multi-step tasks.