harness-plan

Harness Plan

The integrated planning skill of Harness. Consolidates the following 3 legacy skills:

• planning (plan-with-agent) — converting ideas → Plans.md
• plans-management — task state management and marker updates
• sync-status — Plans.md and implementation sync verification

Quick Reference

User input	Subcommand	Action
"Create a plan" / /harness-plan create	create	Spec delta / skip reason → generate Plans.md tasks
"Add a task" / /harness-plan add	add	Add new task to Plans.md
"Mark as complete" / /harness-plan update	update	Change task marker to cc:done
"Where are we?" / /harness-plan sync	sync	Cross-reference and sync implementation with Plans.md
/harness-sync	sync	Progress check (equivalent to independent sync surface)
/harness-plan create	create	Create plans with spec.md / Plans.md dual-source
/harness-plan list	list	List named Plans from plans/manifest.json
/harness-plan switch <name>	switch	Save active plan to .claude/state/active-plan.json

Literal companion commands (CC 2.1.108+)

• /recap: Run sync after getting a fresh summary when you return after a break
• /undo: Alias for /rewind. Use when you want to immediately revert the last plan update

Subcommand Details

Standard planning quality contract

See references/planning-quality.md

harness-plan is a planning surface that produces co-required planning output of spec.md product contract and Plans.md task contract. Precedence remains spec.md > sub-spec > Plans.md. Plans.md is a task ledger; root spec.md is a product contract; the hierarchy must not be broken. Do not convert provided information directly into Plans.md. For plan creation and significant task additions, verify the latest information, existing specifications, memory, and TeamAgent / sub-agent multi-perspective discussions, and only convert elements worth incorporating into this product into task contracts. /harness-plan create returns Spec delta or Spec skip reason paired with Plans.md task generation. Output must always include Spec delta or Spec skip reason. Harness generates Spec delta / Spec skip reason; the consumer only approves or revises.

Non-trivial planning gate:

Planning that is not single-instance or lightweight is treated as requiring TeamAgent or sub-agents. Non-trivial here refers to requests affecting multiple tasks / multiple files / multiple sessions / product behavior / API / data model / permissions / billing / external integrations / distribution surfaces / security. If the Task tool is available, run independent perspectives for Product / Architecture / Security / QA / Skeptic. If unavailable, explicitly state "sub-agent not used" and evaluate the same perspectives separately.

Non-trivial planning output must always include the following verifications.

• team_validation_mode: not_required_lightweight / native / subagent / manual-pass / unavailable
• Consistency of spec.md / sub-spec / Plans.md
• Wheel-reinvention prevention check via harness-mem / harness-recall / repo memory
• Not deviating from the product purpose
• No issues with security, permissions, secrets, or supply chain
• Whether lint / formatter baseline exists; if a plan with source code changes has none configured, place a setup task before implementation tasks
• Whether the plan actually works — i.e., whether test / smoke / CI / review / release gates are included in task DoD

Use team_validation_mode: not_required_lightweight for lightweight tasks. For non-trivial planning, use one of native / subagent / manual-pass. Must not leave it as unavailable and make it Required. Product / Architecture / Security / QA / Skeptic are verification perspectives, not agent_type names. Request them as perspectives from available TeamAgent / Task sub-agents; do not require arbitrary agent spawning. The Security gate does not require actual reading of secrets. If reading .env or secrets becomes necessary, stop at a Risk Gate and verify using allowed existing guards / evidence.

When to apply:

• Creating a new plan with create
• Adding tasks with add that affect product behavior / API / permissions / billing / external integrations / distribution surfaces
• User has provided external products, competitors, specification proposals, improvement ideas, or comparison materials
• There is a risk of conflict with existing specifications or past decisions

When to treat lightly:

• update with only marker updates
• sync with only status reconciliation
• typo, format, README/CHANGELOG only
• Narrow changes where the correct answer is fixed by existing spec and tests

Quality flow:

1. Decompose input, clearly state evaluation targets, scoring axes, and uncertain facts
2. Get latest information. Prioritize WebSearch / official docs / primary sources for external facts; cross-check important points against multiple sources
3. Check existing specifications, root spec.md, Plans.md, README, docs, CLAUDE.md, related skills
4. Check available memory surfaces project-scoped: harness-mem / harness-recall / .claude/agent-memory/ / .claude/state/, etc.
5. For non-trivial planning, use TeamAgent / Task sub-agents for independent review from different perspectives such as Product / Architecture / Security / QA / Skeptic
6. For plans with source code changes, check lint / formatter baseline; if not configured, add setup task first
7. Output neutral scoring review and classify as Required / Recommended / Optional / Reject
8. Report proposal content, reason, and what changes in $easy format
9. Incorporate only adopted proposals into root spec.md / Plans.md / test tasks

create — Plan creation

See references/create.md

Interview for ideas and requirements, then generate an actionable Plans.md.

Flow:

1. Check conversation context (extract from preceding discussion or new interview)
2. Ask what to build (max 3 questions)
3. Planning quality check (latest information, existing specs, memory, TeamAgent / sub-agent multi-perspective review, scoring)
4. Technical research (WebSearch)
5. Feature list extraction
6. spec.md / Plans.md dual-source check (Spec delta or Spec skip reason + Plans.md tasks)
7. Priority matrix (Required / Recommended / Optional / Reject)
8. TDD adoption decision (test design)
9. Generate Plans.md (with cc:TODO markers)
10. Next action guidance

spec.md / Plans.md dual-source check (default)

Plans.md is treated as the task contract for "what needs to be done"; root spec.md is treated as the product contract for "what is correct." Co-required planning output means making both outputs required; precedence remains spec.md > sub-spec > Plans.md. When implementation is likely to drift, update root spec.md before generating Plans.md. create and product-impacting add always read root spec.md.

Priority for storage location:

1. Root spec.md
2. Only when consumer repo has no root spec.md: existing project spec / architecture / product compass
3. Only when consumer repo has no root spec.md: docs/spec/00-project-spec.md
4. For repos with existing conventions, follow the spec path per those conventions

Conditions requiring creation/update:

• Tasks that decide user-visible behavior, API, data model, permissions, billing, or external integrations
• Tasks where multiple implementation policies exist and the choice changes product behavior
• Tasks where "spec ambiguity caused implementation drift" is evident in past or current conversations
• Tasks where the work content is in Plans.md but the project's correct conditions are not in a stable document

Conditions not requiring it:

• typo, format, dependency bump, README/CHANGELOG only
• Narrow refactor without behavior changes
• Fixes where the correct answer is sufficiently fixed by existing spec and tests

Output contract:

• Spec delta: When updating the product contract, write the target spec path and what changes
• Spec skip reason: When not updating the product contract, write the reason
• Harness generates Spec delta / Spec skip reason; the consumer only approves or revises
• Leave Spec skip reason in task context / sprint contract even for docs-only / mechanical tasks
• Do not assert absent for missing search results, unavailable memory, or unread files. not_observed != absent
• Do not have the user write the spec from scratch. The agent creates the minimum delta from existing spec and input, only presenting decision branches when ambiguous

Reference:

• docs/plans/spec-ssot.md

Session launch guidance after create (required)

After create completes, do not end with just an explanation; always provide the new session launch command and the first instruction prompt to enter right after launch as a set.

Priority order:

1. Only 1 incomplete task, or natural to start with just the first one
   • Launch command: claude
   • First input: /harness-work <task number>
2. Multiple tasks with loose dependencies, natural to advance together
   • Launch command: claude
   • First input: /breezing all
   • Alternative: /harness-work all
3. Long-running execution or re-entry required
   • Launch command: ENABLE_PROMPT_CACHING_1H=1 claude
   • First input: /harness-loop all
   • Alternative: /breezing all

Include at least these 3 lines:

• New session launch command:
• First input after launch:
• Suited for:

Example:

New session launch command: claude
First input after launch: /breezing all
Suited for: Phase 1 has multiple tasks and advancing them together is most natural

When recommending long-running mode, also include the Claude Code session launch command:

New session launch command: ENABLE_PROMPT_CACHING_1H=1 claude
First input after launch: /harness-loop all
Suited for: Long-running tasks where waits exceeding 5 minutes or resumptions across sessions are likely

Note:

• scripts/claude-longrun.sh is a development helper script for this repository and is not distributed to consumer environments after plugin install
• Therefore, for consumer-facing guidance, always prioritize the single-line command ENABLE_PROMPT_CACHING_1H=1 claude
• When in a local checkout and you want to use an equivalent wrapper only during repository development, bash scripts/claude-longrun.sh may be used

CI mode (--ci): No interview. Use existing Plans.md as-is and only perform task decomposition.

add — Add task

Add a new task to Plans.md. For product-impacting additions, output Spec delta or Spec skip reason following the "spec.md / Plans.md dual-source check" above.

/harness-plan add task name: detailed description [--phase phase number]

Tasks are added with the cc:TODO marker.

update — Marker update

Change task status markers.

/harness-plan update [task name|task number] [WIP|done|blocked]

Marker mapping:

Command	Marker
WIP	cc:WIP
done / complete	cc:done
blocked	blocked
TODO	cc:TODO

sync — Progress sync

Cross-reference implementation status with Plans.md, detect differences, and update.

See references/sync.md

Flow:

1. Get current state of Plans.md
2. Detect Plans.md format (v1: 3 columns / v2: 5 columns)
3. Get implementation status from git status / git log
4. Check agent trace (.claude/state/agent-trace.jsonl)
5. Detect differences between Plans.md and implementation
6. Propose auto-fix for outdated markers
7. Present next actions

Retrospective (default ON): Automatically run a retrospective if there is at least 1 cc:done task. Analyze estimate accuracy, block cause patterns, and scope fluctuation; record learnings. Can be explicitly skipped with sync --no-retro.

team mode / issue bridge

Keep Plans.md as the source of truth; use GitHub Issue integration only in opt-in team mode.

• Do not use bridge in solo development
• Team mode creates one tracking issue and generates sub-issue payloads per task in dry-run
• scripts/plans-issue-bridge.sh never actually updates GitHub; always returns dry-run payloads
• This bridge does not modify Plans.md

Reference:

• docs/plans/team-mode.md

named Plans

When using multiple Plans.md, use plans/manifest.json as the source of truth and select by name.

scripts/plan-registry.sh list
scripts/plan-registry.sh switch roadmap
scripts/plans-issue-bridge.sh --plan roadmap --format markdown
node scripts/generate-sprint-contract.js --plan roadmap 9.1.1

Operating rules:

• Only use one named plan per run
• Pass --plan <name> explicitly for long-running / CI / issue bridge rather than relying on the active pointer
• Manifest path is project root relative only. Absolute paths, .., and out-of-repo symlinks are rejected

Reference:

• docs/plans/named-plans.md

Plans.md Format Convention

Format

# [Project name] Plans.md

Created: YYYY-MM-DD

---

## Phase N: Phase name

| Task | Content | DoD | Depends | Status |
|------|------|-----|---------|--------|
| N.1  | Description | Tests pass | - | cc:TODO |
| N.2  | Description | lint errors 0 | N.1 | cc:WIP |
| N.3  | Description | Migration executable | N.1, N.2 | cc:done |

DoD (Definition of Done): Write the verifiable completion condition in one line. "Looks good" or "works properly" are prohibited. Must be determinable Yes/No.

Depends: Task dependencies. - (no dependency), task number (N.1), comma-separated (N.1, N.2), phase dependency (Phase N).

TDD tags

Tasks in Plans.md can have TDD judgment tags in their content or DoD.

Tag	Meaning	tdd_required inference
[tdd:required]	This task must write failing tests first	true
[tdd:skip:<reason>]	This task skips TDD with a reason	false, skip_tdd_reason=<reason>

Do not leave <reason> empty. Examples: [tdd:skip:docs-only], [tdd:skip:no-test-framework-detected].

When no tag is present, infer tdd_required in this order:

1. Plans.md tag: [tdd:required] / [tdd:skip:<reason>]
2. Files: required if task includes source implementations under src/, app/, cmd/, lib/, pkg/, internal/, go/, etc.
3. Scaffolder inference: not required with skip reason if docs-only or no test framework detected

optional briefs / manifest

harness-plan create only attaches a brief when needed.

• project spec SSOT is a document that fixes the correct conditions for the entire project, created only when needed
• design brief for tasks with UI
• contract brief for tasks with API
• A brief is a short supplementary document that fixes "what to build"; it does not replace Plans.md or spec SSOT
• The list of skill frontmatter can be generated as machine-readable JSON with scripts/generate-skill-manifest.sh

References:

• docs/plans/briefs-manifest.md
• docs/plans/spec-ssot.md

Marker list

Marker	Meaning
pm:requested	Requested by PM
cc:TODO	Not started
cc:WIP	In progress
cc:done	Worker work complete
pm:confirmed	PM review complete
blocked	Blocked (always include reason)

Related Skills

• harness-sync — Sync implementation with Plans.md
• harness-work — Implement planned tasks
• harness-review — Review implementations
• harness-setup — Project initialization