From majestic-company
Provides frameworks for feature prioritization: RICE scoring, ICE scoring, and Opportunity Solution Trees with templates, tables, and anti-patterns. Useful for deciding what to build next.
npx claudepluginhub majesticlabs-dev/majestic-marketplace --plugin majestic-companyThis skill uses the workspace's default tool permissions.
Frameworks for prioritizing features and opportunities.
Scores and ranks product backlogs using RICE, WSJF, ICE, MoSCoW frameworks. Use for prioritizing features, roadmap decisions, and evaluating trade-offs.
References 9 prioritization frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano, MoSCoW, Opportunity Score) with formulas, usage guides, and templates. Use for selecting, comparing, or learning prioritization methods.
Quantify and rank opportunities using the RICE framework (Reach, Impact, Confidence, Effort) to enable data-driven prioritization and trade-off discussions. Use when comparing diverse features, deciding what to build next, or allocating engineering time across initiatives.
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
Frameworks for prioritizing features and opportunities.
RICE Score = (Reach × Impact × Confidence) / Effort
| Factor | Definition | Scale |
|---|---|---|
| Reach | Users affected per quarter | Actual number |
| Impact | Effect on users | 3=Massive, 2=High, 1=Medium, 0.5=Low, 0.25=Minimal |
| Confidence | How sure are you? | 100%=High, 80%=Medium, 50%=Low |
| Effort | Person-months to ship | Actual estimate |
RICE Table:
| Feature | Reach | Impact | Confidence | Effort | RICE Score |
|---------|-------|--------|------------|--------|------------|
| [Feature A] | 5000 | 2 | 80% | 2 | 4000 |
| [Feature B] | 1000 | 3 | 50% | 1 | 1500 |
ICE Score = Impact × Confidence × Ease
| Factor | Scale |
|---|---|
| Impact | 1-10 (potential value) |
| Confidence | 1-10 (certainty of impact) |
| Ease | 1-10 (implementation simplicity) |
ICE Table:
| Feature | Impact | Confidence | Ease | ICE Score |
|---------|--------|------------|------|-----------|
| [Feature A] | 8 | 7 | 5 | 280 |
| [Feature B] | 6 | 9 | 8 | 432 |
Structure:
Outcome (measurable business goal)
├── Opportunity 1 (unmet customer need)
│ ├── Solution 1a
│ │ └── Experiment: [test]
│ └── Solution 1b
│ └── Experiment: [test]
├── Opportunity 2 (another need)
│ └── Solution 2a
│ └── Experiment: [test]
└── Opportunity 3
└── ...
OST Template:
## Outcome
**Goal:** [Measurable objective]
**Current:** [Baseline metric]
**Target:** [Target metric]
**Timeline:** [By when]
## Opportunity Map
### Opportunity 1: [Customer need/pain point]
**Evidence:** [Interview quotes, data]
**Size:** [How many users affected]
**Solutions considered:**
1. **[Solution A]**
- Effort: [S/M/L]
- Experiment: [How to test cheaply]
- Success metric: [What to measure]
2. **[Solution B]**
- Effort: [S/M/L]
- Experiment: [How to test cheaply]
- Success metric: [What to measure]
**Selected:** [Which and why]
| Framework | Best For | Limitations |
|---|---|---|
| RICE | Large teams, many features | Requires reach data |
| ICE | Quick decisions, small teams | More subjective |
| OST | Strategy alignment | Requires outcome clarity |