Help us improve
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
From thinking-frameworks-skills
Guides creation of academic career documents: research, teaching, diversity statements, CVs, and biosketches for faculty applications, fellowships, promotion packages, and awards.
npx claudepluginhub lyndonkl/claude --plugin thinking-frameworks-skillsHow this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/thinking-frameworks-skills:career-document-architectThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
- [Core Principles](#core-principles)
Drafts academic CVs, research statements, teaching philosophies, diversity statements, cover letters, and tenure dossiers. Also covers networking, web presence, ORCID, and impact metrics.
Generates research, teaching, diversity statements and tenure/promotion narratives for anthropologists at all career stages. Useful for academic job apps, tenure portfolios.
Drafts academic career documents (CVs, research/teaching statements, cover letters, tenure/promotion dossiers) and plans networking, web presence, ORCID setup, and impact metrics.
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
Related skills (use instead for):
grant-proposal-assistantacademic-letter-architectscientific-manuscript-review1. Vision + Track Record: Show where you're going AND what you've accomplished
2. Coherent Narrative: All pieces should tell a unified story
3. Audience Awareness: Tailor depth and framing to readers
4. Evidence-Based Claims: Support assertions with specifics
5. Future-Oriented: Emphasize trajectory and potential
6. Authentic Voice: Represent yourself genuinely
Copy this checklist and track your progress:
Career Document Progress:
- [ ] Step 1: Identify document type and audience
- [ ] Step 2: Gather raw materials (CV, accomplishments)
- [ ] Step 3: Develop core narrative thread
- [ ] Step 4: Draft document using appropriate framework
- [ ] Step 5: Add evidence and specifics
- [ ] Step 6: Align with institutional expectations
- [ ] Step 7: Polish and format
Step 1: Identify Type and Audience
Determine document type (research/teaching/diversity statement, CV, biosketch). Identify audience (search committee, review panel). Note any specific requirements (page limits, format specifications). See resources/methodology.md for audience considerations.
Step 2: Gather Raw Materials
Compile: Current CV, publications, grants, teaching evaluations, mentorship record, outreach activities, preliminary data, future plans. See resources/methodology.md for comprehensive list.
Step 3: Develop Core Narrative
Identify the through-line connecting your work. What question drives you? What impact do you seek? How does past work connect to future plans? See resources/methodology.md for narrative construction.
Step 4: Draft Using Framework
Select appropriate framework for document type. Follow structure that matches institutional norms. See Document Frameworks for each type.
Step 5: Add Evidence and Specifics
Replace generic claims with specific accomplishments. Quantify where possible (papers, citations, students mentored). Add concrete examples for abstract claims.
Step 6: Align with Institution
Research institution's priorities. Emphasize fit without fabricating. Address how you contribute to their mission. See resources/methodology.md for alignment strategies.
Step 7: Polish and Format
Check length constraints. Ensure consistent formatting. Proofread carefully. Validate using resources/evaluators/rubric_career_document.json. Minimum standard: Average score ≥ 3.5.
Purpose: Articulate research vision, demonstrate independence, show future potential
Length: Typically 2-5 pages (check requirements)
Structure:
OPENING (1 paragraph)
- Hook: Compelling statement of your research focus
- Big picture: Why this matters to the field/society
- Your role: How you contribute to addressing this
PAST RESEARCH (1-2 pages)
- Organize by themes, not chronology
- Highlight key contributions with impact
- Show how past work builds foundation for future
- Include quantifiable outcomes (papers, citations, methods)
CURRENT RESEARCH (0.5-1 page)
- Ongoing projects and preliminary results
- Bridge between past and future
- Show productivity and momentum
FUTURE DIRECTIONS (1-2 pages)
- 2-3 specific research directions
- For each: Why important? What's the approach? What's expected impact?
- Show independence and creativity
- Connect to fundable questions (NIH/NSF relevance)
CLOSING (1 paragraph)
- Synthesis: How pieces fit together
- Why this institution/department
- Broader impact statement
Purpose: Articulate teaching philosophy and demonstrate effectiveness
Length: Typically 1-2 pages
Structure:
PHILOSOPHY (1-2 paragraphs)
- Core beliefs about teaching/learning
- What makes your approach distinctive
- Grounded in evidence or experience
EVIDENCE OF EFFECTIVENESS (1-2 paragraphs)
- Courses taught with enrollments
- Teaching evaluations (quote specific feedback)
- Student outcomes (publications, placements)
- Innovations introduced
METHODS AND APPROACHES (1-2 paragraphs)
- Specific techniques you use
- Active learning strategies
- Assessment approaches
- Technology integration
MENTORSHIP (1 paragraph)
- Undergraduate/graduate mentoring
- Student achievements
- Mentoring philosophy
FUTURE TEACHING (1 paragraph)
- Courses you could teach
- New courses you'd develop
- Curricular contributions
Purpose: Demonstrate commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion
Length: Typically 1-2 pages
Structure:
INTRODUCTION (1 paragraph)
- Your understanding of DEI in academia
- Why it matters to you
- Preview of your contributions
PAST ACTIONS (1-2 paragraphs)
- Specific activities promoting DEI
- Mentoring underrepresented students
- Curriculum development
- Outreach activities
- Quantify impact where possible
PERSONAL CONTEXT (optional, 1 paragraph)
- Your own background if relevant
- Experiences informing your commitment
- Only include if comfortable and genuine
FUTURE PLANS (1 paragraph)
- How you'll contribute at this institution
- Specific programs or initiatives
- Connection to institutional DEI priorities
CLOSING
- Synthesis of commitment
- Why this matters for your field
Standard Sections:
CONTACT INFORMATION
EDUCATION
- Degrees in reverse chronological order
- Institution, degree, year, advisor (for PhD)
POSITIONS
- Academic appointments
- Industry positions (if relevant)
PUBLICATIONS
- Peer-reviewed (mark * for corresponding author)
- Preprints
- Reviews/Book chapters
GRANTS AND FUNDING
- Current and past funding
- Role (PI, Co-PI, etc.)
- Amount and duration
HONORS AND AWARDS
PRESENTATIONS
- Invited talks
- Conference presentations
TEACHING
- Courses taught
- Mentoring record
SERVICE
- Editorial boards
- Review panels
- Committee work
PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIPS
Length: 5 pages maximum
Sections:
A. PERSONAL STATEMENT (0.5 page)
- Why you're well-suited for this project
- Relevant experience and expertise
- Key accomplishments that qualify you
- Up to 4 publications supporting this statement
B. POSITIONS, SCIENTIFIC APPOINTMENTS, AND HONORS
C. CONTRIBUTIONS TO SCIENCE (up to 5 contributions, 0.5 page each)
- Contribution 1:
- Description of contribution (1 paragraph)
- Your specific role
- Impact on field
- Up to 4 publications supporting this contribution
- [Repeat for each contribution]
D. RESEARCH SUPPORT
- Current (with role, title, dates, description)
- Completed (last 3 years)
For every claim, ask "so what?" If you can't answer, the claim needs more:
| Claim | So What? | Improved |
|---|---|---|
| "I published 10 papers" | Impact? | "My 10 papers have been cited 500 times, including 3 that established new methods in the field" |
| "I'm passionate about teaching" | Evidence? | "My passion for teaching is reflected in consistent evaluation scores above 4.5/5 and 5 undergraduates who went to PhD programs" |
| "I'm committed to diversity" | What have you done? | "I co-founded a mentoring program that has supported 20 students from underrepresented groups" |
| Telling (Weak) | Showing (Strong) |
|---|---|
| "I am a productive researcher" | "I have published 15 peer-reviewed articles including 3 in high-impact journals" |
| "I am an effective teacher" | "Student evaluations average 4.7/5.0 with comments highlighting my use of active learning" |
| "I am committed to mentoring" | "I have mentored 8 undergraduates, 5 of whom are now in PhD programs" |
For each future direction:
Key requirements:
Common pitfalls:
Key resources:
Typical lengths:
| Document | Typical Length |
|---|---|
| Research Statement | 2-5 pages |
| Teaching Statement | 1-2 pages |
| Diversity Statement | 1-2 pages |
| NIH Biosketch | 5 pages max |
Time estimates:
Inputs required:
Outputs produced: