compliance-and-audit

Compliance and Audit

Overview

This skill maintains the governance, risk, and compliance (GRC) layer of the Secure SDLC. It translates security work into auditable, framework-aligned documentation that survives a real audit — not a self-assessment checklist filled in the night before.

The discipline: compliance is a continuous process. Every security control implemented during Build and Test must be captured as evidence at the time it is implemented, not reconstructed six months later.

When to Use

• A new project or feature processes regulated data (PII, payment data, health data)
• A compliance gap analysis is required
• Risks need to be formally accepted, transferred, or mitigated on record
• Audit evidence must be collected for a specific control
• Producing a compliance attestation before a release or audit
• Responding to a customer security questionnaire or due diligence request

Process

Step 1 — Determine applicable frameworks

Based on data classification and business context, identify which frameworks apply:

Framework	Applies when…
SOC 2 Type II	You process customer data and need to demonstrate trust to enterprise buyers
ISO/IEC 27001:2022	Formal ISMS certification is required (often for EU/UK contracts)
NIST CSF 2.0	US federal contracts or voluntary alignment with US security standards
PCI DSS v4.0	Any feature handling payment card data
GDPR / UK GDPR	Any processing of personal data of EU or UK residents
DORA	Financial services entities operating in the EU
HIPAA	Protected health information (PHI) in the US
OWASP ASVS	Always — this is the technical requirements anchor for all other frameworks

Step 2 — Produce the risk register

Create or update docs/risk-register.md with every identified risk:

| Risk ID | Description | Category | Likelihood | Impact | Inherent Risk | Control(s) | Residual Risk | Owner | Status | Due Date |
|---------|-------------|----------|------------|--------|--------------|------------|--------------|-------|--------|----------|
| R-001 | SQL injection in search endpoint | Application | High | Critical | Critical | Input validation, WAF, SAST | Medium | Dev Lead | Open | YYYY-MM-DD |
| R-002 | Insider access to production DB | Access Control | Medium | High | High | RBAC, PAM, audit logs | Low | Cloud/Platform | Mitigated | — |

Every vulnerability found by any agent must appear here with an owner, severity, and status. Risks do not disappear — they are mitigated, accepted, or transferred, with documentation.

Step 3 — Map controls to frameworks

Produce a control mapping table that connects ASVS requirements to applicable framework controls:

| ASVS Ref | Requirement | SOC 2 | ISO 27001 | NIST CSF | PCI DSS |
|----------|-------------|-------|-----------|----------|---------| 
| V2.1.1 | Password complexity ≥ 12 chars | CC6.1 | A.8.5 | PR.AC-1 | Req 8.3 |
| V6.1.1 | Encryption at rest (AES-256) | CC6.7 | A.8.24 | PR.DS-1 | Req 3.5 |
| V9.1.1 | TLS 1.2+ for all external comms | CC6.7 | A.8.20 | PR.DS-2 | Req 4.2 |

Step 4 — Collect audit evidence at time of implementation

For every control validated during Build or Test, create an evidence record immediately:

## Evidence Record: [Control ID]

**Control:** [Framework] — [Reference] — [Control Name]
**Evidence Type:** Test result / Configuration screenshot / Policy document / Log extract
**Date Collected:** YYYY-MM-DD
**Collected By:** [Who or which agent]
**Description:** [What this demonstrates — be specific enough for an auditor who wasn't there]
**Artefact:** [File path or link]
**Review Status:** Pending / Approved

Evidence must be collected at implementation time. Evidence reconstructed after the fact fails audit scrutiny.

Step 5 — Risk acceptance process

When a risk cannot be fully mitigated before release:

1. Document the risk in full (likelihood, impact, inherent score, existing controls)
2. Describe the residual risk after controls
3. Obtain a written business justification
4. Record the name and role of the approver (must be appropriate seniority for the risk level)
5. Set a mandatory review date — accepted risks expire

## Risk Acceptance: [Risk ID]

**Risk:** [Description]
**Inherent Risk:** [Score]
**Mitigating Controls:** [What's already in place]
**Residual Risk:** [Score after controls]
**Business Justification:** [Why this risk is being accepted rather than fixed]
**Accepted By:** [Name, Role]
**Acceptance Date:** YYYY-MM-DD
**Review Date:** YYYY-MM-DD

Step 6 — Produce the release compliance attestation

Before every release, write docs/audit-evidence/compliance-attestation-vX.Y.Z.md:

## Compliance Attestation — Release vX.Y.Z

**Date:** YYYY-MM-DD
**Frameworks in scope:** [List]

### Control Status Summary

| Framework | Total Controls | Compliant | Gap | Accepted Risk |
|-----------|---------------|-----------|-----|---------------|
| SOC 2 | 22 | 20 | 1 | 1 |

### Open Gaps
[List with owner and remediation timeline]

### Accepted Risks
[List with business justification and approver]

### Attestation
All in-scope controls reviewed. Gaps and accepted risks formally acknowledged.
Release is approved from a GRC perspective pending Release Manager sign-off.

Common Rationalizations

Excuse	Counter
"We'll document compliance after we launch"	Auditors require evidence contemporaneous with the control implementation. Retrospective documentation is a finding.
"We're too early-stage for formal compliance"	SOC 2 readiness takes 6–12 months. If you start when a customer requires it, you've already lost the deal.
"We've accepted this risk before"	Risk acceptance is time-bound and context-specific. Prior acceptance does not carry forward to a new feature or a changed threat landscape.
"The risk register is the security team's job, not mine"	Risk ownership belongs to the team generating the risk. Dev teams own application risks; Cloud teams own infrastructure risks.
"Our pentest report counts as audit evidence"	Pentest evidence is one artefact. Auditors require evidence for each control, not a single document.

Red Flags

• A risk register that hasn't been updated since the last audit
• Accepted risks with no expiry date — permanent acceptance is not a valid posture
• Compliance controls documented but no evidence they were actually implemented
• A feature handling PII with no GDPR Article 30 record of processing activity
• Audit evidence collected in a rush the week before an audit, not at time of implementation
• Framework mapping that lists "compliant" for controls that were never tested
• Risk acceptance signed off by an engineer rather than appropriate business authority

Verification

Do not close this phase until:

• All applicable compliance frameworks identified and documented
• Risk register is current — all findings from appsec-engineer and cloud-platform-engineer have entries
• Control mapping table exists in docs/ and reflects current ASVS requirements
• Audit evidence collected for every control claimed as implemented
• All accepted risks have a named approver, business justification, and review date
• Compliance attestation document written and reviewed before release
• grc-analyst has provided compliance context to release-manager for the go/no-go decision