From qiongli
Standardized end-to-end workflow for academic paper production across Codex, Claude Code, and Gemini. Use when a user needs to choose a paper type (empirical, qualitative, systematic review, methods, theory), select a workflow stage, and produce consistent artifacts under RESEARCH/[topic]/ with explicit task IDs, quality gates, and submission-ready outputs.
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/qiongli:qiongli-workflowThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
Run a model-agnostic paper workflow using shared Task IDs and artifact contracts.
VERSIONagents/openai.yamlreferences/academic-output-rubric.mdreferences/citation-risk-policy.mdreferences/coverage-matrix.mdreferences/evidence-ledger-contract.mdreferences/literature-search-quality-contract.mdreferences/method-diagnostic-contract.mdreferences/platform-routing.mdreferences/stage-A-framing.mdreferences/stage-B-literature.mdreferences/stage-C-design.mdreferences/stage-D-ethics.mdreferences/stage-E-synthesis.mdreferences/stage-F-writing.mdreferences/stage-G-compliance.mdreferences/stage-H-submission.mdreferences/stage-I-code.mdreferences/stage-J-proofread.mdreferences/stage-K-presentation.mdRun a model-agnostic paper workflow using shared Task IDs and artifact contracts.
This is a self-contained skill package. All assets needed for execution — workflows, skill specifications, output templates, standards, and agent roles — are bundled in subdirectories of this package. No external repo access is needed.
paper_type: empirical, qualitative, systematic-review, methods, or theory.task_id from the contract (for example F3 or G1).RESEARCH/[topic]/ using the exact file paths.H1, H2).task-run, declare controller ownership when relevant with --execution-mode, --controller, --primary, --reviewer, --verifier, and --solo-role-gates.These commands map to the same behavior across Codex, Claude Code, and Gemini:
/paper [topic] [venue] # Master router — choose paper type + task ID
/lit-review [topic] [year range] # Systematic literature review (PRISMA)
/paper-read [URL or DOI] # Deep paper analysis
/find-gap [research area] # Identify research gaps
/build-framework [theory/concept] # Build theoretical framework
/academic-write [section] [topic] # Academic writing assistance
/synthesize [topic] [outcome_id] # Evidence synthesis / meta-analysis
/paper-write [topic] [type] [venue] # Full manuscript drafting
/study-design [topic] # Empirical study design
/ethics-check [topic] # Ethics / IRB pack
/submission-prep [topic] [venue] # Submission package
/rebuttal [topic] # Rebuttal / response to reviewers
/code-build [method] --domain ... # Build academic research code
/proofread [topic] # AI de-trace / final proofreading
/academic-present [topic] # Academic presentation preparation
Full workflow definitions are included in the workflows/ subdirectory of this skill package. When a user invokes any command above (e.g. /paper, /lit-review), read the corresponding file from workflows/<command-name>.md for the complete execution instructions.
The workflows/paper.md file is the master router — it maps every Task ID (A1–K4) to the correct sub-workflow or skill card. Start there for any task-ID-based request.
The skill system covers the full research lifecycle across 11 stages:
skills/
├── A_framing/ (question-refiner, contribution-crafter, hypothesis-generator, theory-mapper, gap-analyzer, venue-analyzer)
├── B_literature/ (academic-searcher, paper-screener, paper-extractor, citation-snowballer, fulltext-fetcher, citation-formatter, concept-extractor, literature-mapper, reference-manager-bridge)
├── C_design/ (study-designer, rival-hypothesis-designer, robustness-planner, dataset-finder, variable-constructor, data-dictionary-builder, data-management-plan, prereg-writer, variable-operationalizer)
├── D_ethics/ (ethics-irb-helper, statement-generator, deidentification-planner)
├── E_synthesis/ (effect-size-calculator, evidence-synthesizer, quality-assessor, publication-bias-checker, qualitative-coding)
├── F_writing/ (manuscript-architect, analysis-interpreter, effect-size-interpreter, table-generator, figure-specifier, meta-optimizer, discussion-writer)
├── G_compliance/ (prisma-checker, reporting-checker, tone-normalizer)
├── J_proofread/ (ai-fingerprint-scanner, human-voice-rewriter, similarity-checker, final-proofreader)
├── H_submission/ (submission-packager, rebuttal-assistant, peer-review-simulation, fatal-flaw-detector, reviewer-empathy-checker, credit-taxonomy-helper, limitation-auditor)
├── I_code/ (code-builder, data-cleaning-planner, data-merge-planner, code-specification, code-planning, code-execution, code-review, reproducibility-auditor, stats-engine)
├── K_presentation/ (presentation-planner, slide-architect, slidev-scholarly-builder, beamer-builder)
├── Z_cross_cutting/ (academic-context-maintainer, metadata-enricher, model-collaborator, self-critique)
└── domain-profiles/ (economics, finance, psychology, biomedical, education, cs-ai, ...)
RESEARCH/[topic]/
├── context/ # Project-level research state + decision log
├── framing/ # A-stage outputs (RQ, hypothesis, contribution, venue)
├── protocol.md # Research protocol
├── search_log.md # Reproducible search records
├── screening/ # Screening logs + PRISMA flow
├── notes/ # Individual paper notes
├── extraction_table.md # Data extraction table
├── synthesis.md # Final synthesis report
├── manuscript/ # Outline, draft, claims map, figures plan
├── proofread/ # AI detection, humanization, similarity, final proofread
├── submission/ # Cover letter, checklist, statements
├── revision/ # Rebuttal + response materials
├── analysis/ # Code + data pipelines
├── presentation/ # Slide deck spec, slides.md / slides.tex
└── bibliography.bib # BibTeX references
references/workflow-contract.md.self-critique is one of the required skills, preserve critique history across revision rounds and treat review/self_critique_log.md as the canonical issue register for the loop.G).RESEARCH/[topic]/evidence/claim-evidence-ledger.csv using references/evidence-ledger-contract.md; unsupported central claims become gap notes, not invented citations.references/citation-risk-policy.md when citation support is material.RESEARCH/[topic]/context/stage_handoff.md using references/stage-handoff-contract.md.venue-profiles/ when a target venue profile is available; otherwise create a venue gap note instead of assuming community-specific expectations.references/academic-output-rubric.md whenever producing scholarly prose, synthesis, design, review, or submission artifacts.task-run accepts only solo|duo|triad for --execution-mode, only runtime agents for --controller / --primary / --reviewer / --verifier, and only strict|standard|off for --solo-role-gates.--mcp-strict and --skills-strict for authoritative controller-aware runs; avoid --skip-validation for submission-facing, Stage-I code, or final manuscript outputs.off.templates/<name>.md, load the template from the templates/ subdirectory of this package.Three-tier loading for token efficiency. All paths are relative to this skill package directory:
skills-summary.md — skill names + one-line descriptions per stage. Use this to identify which skill to invoke.skills-core.md — consolidated process descriptions, templates, and output formats. Use this when executing a skill.skills/[stage]/[skill-name].md — detailed edge cases, error recovery, quality bars, and verbose templates. Use this only when the core reference is insufficient.This package includes the following subdirectories:
| Directory | Contents |
|---|---|
workflows/ | 16 workflow definitions (slash commands) |
references/ | Stage playbooks + workflow contract |
skills/ | 71 detailed skill spec files across 13 stage directories |
skills-summary.md | Quick-reference skill index (~3KB) |
skills-core.md | Consolidated skill reference (~19KB) |
templates/ | 50+ output templates for manuscripts, submissions, ethics, evidence, and handoffs |
standards/ | Canonical contract YAML + capability map + agent profiles |
roles/ | 10 agent role definitions for orchestrator execution |
venue-profiles/ | Venue expectation profiles for CHI, ACL, NeurIPS, Nature, JAMA, and AOM |
references/workflow-contract.mdreferences/platform-routing.mdreferences/coverage-matrix.mdreferences/academic-output-rubric.mdreferences/evidence-ledger-contract.mdreferences/citation-risk-policy.mdreferences/stage-handoff-contract.mdreferences/method-diagnostic-contract.mdreferences/stage-A-framing.md (tasks A1–A5)references/stage-B-literature.md (tasks B1–B6)references/stage-C-design.md (tasks C1–C5)references/stage-D-ethics.md (tasks D1–D3)references/stage-E-synthesis.md (tasks E1–E5)references/stage-F-writing.md (tasks F1–F6)references/stage-G-compliance.md (tasks G1–G4)references/stage-J-proofread.md (tasks J1–J4)references/stage-H-submission.md (tasks H1–H4)references/stage-I-code.md (tasks I1–I9)references/stage-K-presentation.md (tasks K1–K4)npx claudepluginhub jxpeng98/skillsplace --plugin qiongliCreates structured, bite-sized implementation plans from specs or requirements before writing code. Useful for breaking down multi-step tasks into testable steps with file structure and task boundaries.