From Content Writing
Guides content research with source verification, the CRAAP test for reliability scoring, and citation formatting in APA 7th edition. Useful for fact-checking and academic writing.
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/content-writing:content-researchThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
Исследование контента: поиск источников, верификация, цитирование, fact-checking.
Исследование контента: поиск источников, верификация, цитирование, fact-checking.
┌─────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 1. DEFINE - определи вопрос │
└─────────────────┬───────────────────┘
▼
┌─────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 2. SEARCH - найди источники │
└─────────────────┬───────────────────┘
▼
┌─────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 3. EVALUATE - оцени надёжность │
└─────────────────┬───────────────────┘
▼
┌─────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 4. EXTRACT - извлеки информацию │
└─────────────────┬───────────────────┘
▼
┌─────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 5. SYNTHESIZE - синтезируй выводы │
└─────────────────┬───────────────────┘
▼
┌─────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 6. CITE - оформи ссылки │
└─────────────────────────────────────┘
| Source Type | Reliability | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| Academic Journals | Highest | Nature, Science, IEEE |
| Official Reports | High | Government, WHO, World Bank |
| Books (peer-reviewed) | High | Academic publishers |
| Reputable News | Medium-High | Reuters, AP, established media |
| Industry Reports | Medium-High | Gartner, McKinsey |
| Expert Blogs | Medium | Depends on author credentials |
| Wikipedia | Medium | Good for overview, verify sources |
| Social Media | Low-Medium | Verify independently |
| Random Websites | Low | Verify carefully |
## Source Evaluation: [Source Name]
### Currency
- When was it published? [Date]
- Is the information current for the topic? [Yes/No]
- Are links functional? [Yes/No]
Score: [1-5]
### Relevance
- Does it relate to your topic? [Yes/No]
- Who is the intended audience? [Audience]
- Is the level appropriate? [Yes/No]
Score: [1-5]
### Authority
- Who is the author/publisher? [Name]
- What are their credentials? [Credentials]
- Is there contact information? [Yes/No]
- Is the domain appropriate? (.edu, .gov, etc.)
Score: [1-5]
### Accuracy
- Is information supported by evidence? [Yes/No]
- Can you verify it elsewhere? [Yes/No]
- Is it peer-reviewed? [Yes/No]
- Are there spelling/grammar errors? [Yes/No]
Score: [1-5]
### Purpose
- Why does this exist? [Inform/Teach/Sell/Entertain/Persuade]
- Is there bias? [Yes/No]
- Are facts vs opinions clear? [Yes/No]
Score: [1-5]
**Total Score:** [X/25]
- 20-25: Excellent source
- 15-19: Good, use with some caution
- 10-14: Questionable, verify elsewhere
- Below 10: Avoid
# Book
Author, A. A. (Year). Title of work: Capital letter also for subtitle.
Publisher.
# Journal Article
Author, A. A., & Author, B. B. (Year). Title of article. Title of
Periodical, volume(issue), page–page. https://doi.org/xxxxx
# Website
Author, A. A. (Year, Month Day). Title of page. Site Name. URL
# Examples:
Smith, J. D. (2023). The art of research. Academic Press.
Johnson, A., & Williams, B. (2024). Modern approaches to data
analysis. Journal of Data Science, 15(2), 45–67.
https://doi.org/10.1234/jds.2024.567
OpenAI. (2024, January 15). GPT-4 technical report. OpenAI Blog.
https://openai.com/blog/gpt-4
# Book
Last, First. Title. Publisher, Year.
# Journal Article
Last, First, and First Last. "Article Title." Journal Title,
vol. X, no. X, Year, pp. X–X.
# Website
Last, First. "Page Title." Site Name, Publisher, Day Month Year, URL.
# Examples:
Smith, John. The Art of Research. Academic Press, 2023.
Johnson, Anna, and Brian Williams. "Modern Approaches to Data
Analysis." Journal of Data Science, vol. 15, no. 2, 2024, pp. 45–67.
"GPT-4 Technical Report." OpenAI, 15 Jan. 2024,
openai.com/blog/gpt-4.
# Book (Notes-Bibliography)
First Last, Title (Place: Publisher, Year), page.
# Footnote
1. John Smith, The Art of Research (New York: Academic Press, 2023), 45.
# Bibliography
Smith, John. The Art of Research. New York: Academic Press, 2023.
| Tool | Best For | Access |
|---|---|---|
| Google Scholar | General academic | Free |
| PubMed | Medical/Life sciences | Free |
| IEEE Xplore | Engineering/CS | Subscription |
| JSTOR | Humanities/Social | Subscription |
| arXiv | Preprints (CS, Physics) | Free |
| Semantic Scholar | AI-powered search | Free |
| Tool | Focus |
|---|---|
| Snopes | General debunking |
| FactCheck.org | Political claims |
| PolitiFact | Political statements |
| Full Fact | UK focus |
| Reuters Fact Check | News claims |
| Tool | Features |
|---|---|
| Zotero | Free, open-source |
| Mendeley | Free, social features |
| EndNote | Paid, comprehensive |
| Paperpile | Google Docs integration |
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Topic: [Research Topic] │
│ Source: [Citation] │
├─────────────┬───────────────────────────────────────┤
│ CUES │ NOTES │
│ │ │
│ Key points │ - Main idea 1 │
│ Questions │ - Supporting detail │
│ Keywords │ - Quote: "..." │
│ │ │
│ │ - Main idea 2 │
│ │ - Evidence │
│ │ │
├─────────────┴───────────────────────────────────────┤
│ SUMMARY │
│ [Synthesize the key takeaways in your own words] │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
## Source Card
**Citation:** [Full citation]
**Access Date:** [Date]
**Reliability Score:** [1-5]
### Key Claims
1. [Claim 1]
2. [Claim 2]
### Quotes
> "[Direct quote]" (p. X)
### My Notes
[Interpretation, connections, questions]
### Tags
#topic1 #topic2
Claim: "[Statement to verify]"
Source 1: [Source] - [Confirms/Contradicts/Neutral]
Source 2: [Source] - [Confirms/Contradicts/Neutral]
Source 3: [Source] - [Confirms/Contradicts/Neutral]
Conclusion: [Verified/Partially Verified/Unverified/False]
## Tracing to Primary Source
Claim in Article: "[Claim]"
↓
Cited Source: [Secondary source]
↓
Original Study: [Primary source]
↓
Actual Finding: "[What study actually said]"
Match? [Yes/No/Partially]
# Signal Phrases
According to Smith (2024), "..."
As Johnson argues, "..."
Research suggests that "..." (Williams, 2023).
# Paraphrasing
Original: "The study found a 45% increase in productivity."
Paraphrase: Research demonstrated significant productivity gains,
nearly half higher than baseline (Smith, 2024).
# Summarizing
In their comprehensive review, Johnson and Williams (2024)
examined 50 studies on remote work, concluding that...
✅ DO:
- Quote exactly with quotation marks
- Paraphrase in your own words + cite
- Cite ideas, not just quotes
- Use citation management tools
❌ DON'T:
- Copy-paste without attribution
- Change a few words and call it paraphrase
- Use someone's ideas without credit
- Forget to cite common knowledge sources
# Citation generation with API
def format_citation(source: dict, style: str = "apa") -> str:
"""Generate formatted citation"""
if style == "apa":
return f"{source['author']} ({source['year']}). {source['title']}. {source['publisher']}."
elif style == "mla":
return f"{source['author']}. {source['title']}. {source['publisher']}, {source['year']}."
# Verify URL accessibility
import requests
def verify_source_url(url: str) -> dict:
"""Check if source URL is accessible"""
try:
response = requests.head(url, timeout=10, allow_redirects=True)
return {
"url": url,
"accessible": response.status_code == 200,
"status": response.status_code
}
except:
return {"url": url, "accessible": False, "status": None}
npx claudepluginhub jhamidun/claude-code-config-pack --plugin content-writingBuilds a throwaway prototype to answer a design question about UI appearance or state/logic behavior. Guides you through two branches: interactive terminal app for logic validation, or multiple UI variations for visual exploration.