Stats
Actions
Tags
Help us improve
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
From uxinator
Post-delivery evaluation of a keynote. Did the provocation land? Did the audience shift? What to iterate for next time. Use for "how did my talk go", "keynote eval", "evaluate my speech".
npx claudepluginhub jabberlockie/the-human-stack-plugins-public --plugin uxinatorHow this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/uxinator:speech-evaluateThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
Post-delivery retrospective for keynotes and conference talks. Assesses whether the provocation landed, the emotional arc worked, and the audience shifted. Feeds directly into speech-iterate for versioning the talk.
Analyzes meeting transcripts for communication patterns including conflict avoidance, filler words, interruptions, speaking ratios, and active listening. Delivers timestamped feedback and trends.
Guides Next.js Cache Components and Partial Prerendering (PPR): 'use cache' directives, cacheLife(), cacheTag(), revalidateTag() for caching, invalidation, static/dynamic optimization. Auto-activates on cacheComponents: true.
Migrates code, prompts, and API calls from Claude Sonnet 4.0/4.5 or Opus 4.1 to Opus 4.5, updating model strings on Anthropic, AWS, GCP, Azure platforms.
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
Post-delivery retrospective for keynotes and conference talks. Assesses whether the provocation landed, the emotional arc worked, and the audience shifted. Feeds directly into speech-iterate for versioning the talk.
DID THE AUDIENCE SHIFT?
───────────────────────
BEFORE STATE: [What the audience believed/felt before the talk]
INTENDED AFTER STATE: [What they should believe/feel after]
ACTUAL AFTER STATE: [Evidence of what actually happened]
SHIFT ACHIEVED: [YES | PARTIALLY | NO]
EVIDENCE:
- [Quote, behavior, feedback that shows shift]
- [Quote, behavior, feedback that shows shift]
- [Or: silence / polite applause / generic "that was great" = NO shift evidence]
THE ONE LINE
────────────
DESIGNED LINE: [What was supposed to be repeated]
DID ANYONE REPEAT IT? [YES — where? | NO]
WHAT THEY ACTUALLY REPEATED: [Sometimes a different line lands harder]
IF DIFFERENT: Consider making THAT line the designed one in v2.
PEAK-END EVALUATION
───────────────────
DESIGNED PEAK: [What was planned as the peak moment]
ACTUAL PEAK: [What the audience responded to most intensely]
MATCH: [SAME | DIFFERENT — note what surprised]
DESIGNED CLOSE: [What was planned]
ACTUAL CLOSE: [What Tim actually said/did]
CLOSE QUALITY: [STRONG | ADEQUATE | TRAILED OFF | DIFFERENT FROM PLAN]
PEAK-END PREDICTION: [Based on actual peak + actual end, what will
the audience REMEMBER about this talk?]
MODE DISCIPLINE
───────────────
PLANNED MODE: KEYNOTE (provocation)
ACTUAL MODE: [What Tim actually did — may vary by section]
DRIFT MOMENTS:
- [Timestamp/section]: [What happened — e.g., "Stopped to explain the
UX² framework for 4 minutes. Audience energy dropped visibly."]
EXPLAIN CONTAMINATION: [X]% of delivery was education, not provocation
AUDIENCE RESPONSE DATA
──────────────────────
DURING TALK:
- Energy shifts: [When did they lean in? When did they check phones?]
- Laughter: [Where? Was it earned or polite?]
- Note-taking: [Where? This indicates "useful" not "moved"]
- Visible reactions: [Nods, head shakes, whispers to neighbor]
AFTER TALK:
- Approach rate: [How many people came up to Tim after?]
- Questions asked: [What did they ask? "How do I..." = training response.
"I never thought of it that way" = provocation response.]
- Social mentions: [Any posts, tags, quotes shared?]
- Feedback forms: [Scores + verbatim comments]
- Invitations: [Did anyone invite Tim to speak again? Where?]
- Connections: [LinkedIn requests, card exchanges, DMs]
SIGNAL INTERPRETATION:
[What do these signals tell us about whether the talk provoked or taught?]
TIM'S FELT EXPERIENCE
─────────────────────
Energy level: [How did Tim feel during delivery? Alive? Flat? Rushed?]
Story delivery: [Did the anchor story land the way he wanted?]
Close execution: [Did Tim deliver the close as designed or improvise?]
Drift awareness: [Did Tim notice himself drifting? Where?]
Audience connection: [Did Tim feel connected to the room or performing at it?]
Surprise moments: [Anything unexpected that worked? That didn't?]
KEYNOTE EVALUATION
══════════════════
PROVOCATION: [LANDED | PARTIALLY | MISSED]
EMOTIONAL ARC: [COMPELLING | ADEQUATE | FLAT]
CLOSE: [STRONG | ADEQUATE | WEAK]
MODE DISCIPLINE: [CLEAN | MINOR DRIFT | MAJOR DRIFT]
AUDIENCE SHIFT: [EVIDENT | UNCLEAR | NO EVIDENCE]
OVERALL: [X/50 across 5 dimensions, 10 each]
WHAT WORKED (keep for v2):
1. [Specific]
2. [Specific]
WHAT DIDN'T (fix for v2):
1. [Specific]
2. [Specific]
VERSION NOTE: [What should change in the next delivery of this talk?
Feed this into speech-iterate.]