Help us improve
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
npx claudepluginhub iyulab/claude-plugins --plugin iyuHow this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/iyu:prThis skill is limited to the following tools:
The summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
Review PRs aligned with project philosophy. Focus on what Claude wouldn't catch without project context.
Guides technical evaluation of code review feedback: read fully, restate for understanding, verify against codebase, respond with reasoning or pushback before implementing.
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
Review PRs aligned with project philosophy. Focus on what Claude wouldn't catch without project context.
https://github.com/user/repo/pull/123#123 (in repo context)Flags: --quick (blockers only) | --save (save to ./claudedocs/pr-review-[date]-[number].md) | --security-focus (security-focused review)
gh pr view $0 --json state,mergeable,reviewDecision,statusCheckRollupgh pr view $0 --json title,body,author,files,additions,deletions,commits,comments,reviewsgh pr diff $0From the pre-loaded status data:
merged / closed → SKIPdraft → Brief reviewFrom the pre-loaded details: Identify: What problem does it solve? What approach? Contributor type (First-time / Returning / Core).
Classify findings by severity:
| Level | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Blocker | Must fix — bugs, security, critical logic errors |
| Major | Should fix — performance, missing tests, pattern violations |
| Minor | Nice to have — naming, docs, minor improvements |
| Praise | Must include at least 1 — acknowledge good work |
Security issues are always Blocker.
Read CLAUDE.md / README.md. Evaluate using the philosophy-alignment-guide.md:
| Dimension | Question |
|---|---|
| Core Mission Fit | Serves project's core purpose? |
| Scope Alignment | Library vs application responsibility? |
| Pattern Consistency | Consistent with existing architecture? |
| User Base Impact | Benefits majority or niche? |
Overall: High (4-5 avg) / Medium (3-3.9) / Low (1-2.9)
Latent discovery: Does this PR reveal gaps? Missing tests elsewhere? API design issues? Documentation needs?
| Quality HIGH | Quality LOW | |
|---|---|---|
| Philosophy HIGH | APPROVE | MERGE_WITH_FIXES |
| Philosophy MED | APPROVE_WITH_NOTES | REQUEST_CHANGES |
| Philosophy LOW | REDIRECT | DECLINE |
For decision examples, see decision-examples.md.
Adjust tone by contributor type:
For tone rules, see tone-rules.md.
Blockers only → APPROVE or REQUEST_CHANGES.