Help us improve
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
From dev-workflow
Use when the user needs to research a technical topic, compare approaches, or build an evidence-based document with industry sources and expert opinions
npx claudepluginhub infraspecdev/tesseract --plugin dev-workflowHow this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/dev-workflow:researchThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
Research a technical topic and produce a well-sourced document with direct quotes, industry references, and a clear recommendation.
Guides technical evaluation of code review feedback: read fully, restate for understanding, verify against codebase, respond with reasoning or pushback before implementing.
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
Research a technical topic and produce a well-sourced document with direct quotes, industry references, and a clear recommendation.
The user provides a topic or question, optionally with:
If not specified, save to docs/ in the current repo.
digraph research_flow {
rankdir=TB;
node [shape=box];
input [label="1. Clarify Topic & Scope"];
research [label="2. Research (Parallel Agents)"];
synthesize [label="3. Synthesize Findings"];
write [label="4. Write Document"];
review [label="5. Show Summary to User"];
input -> research;
research -> synthesize;
synthesize -> write;
write -> review;
}
Ask the user (if not already clear):
Skip if the user already provided enough context.
Launch parallel Task agents to maximize coverage:
Each agent should return:
Combine research into a coherent narrative:
Use this structure:
# [Decision Title]
**Status:** Proposed
**Date:** [date]
**Context:** [1-2 sentences on what prompted this]
## Decision
[Clear statement of the recommended approach]
## Why Not [Alternative]?
[Side-by-side comparison table if applicable]
## What the Industry Recommends
### [Source 1 Name] ([Role/Context])
> *"Direct quote"*
> — [Source with link]
### [Source 2 Name] ([Role/Context])
> *"Direct quote"*
> — [Source with link]
[Repeat for 4-8 authoritative sources]
## How This Works in Practice
[Concrete examples, config snippets, or workflow descriptions relevant to the user's setup]
## Migration Path / Reversibility
[How to change course if the decision turns out wrong]
## When to Reconsider
| Signal | Threshold |
|--------|-----------|
| [trigger] | [specific number or condition] |
## Summary
[2-3 sentence wrap-up tying recommendation to evidence]
## References
- [All source URLs as clickable links]