Help us improve
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
From pair-review
Fetches AI-generated code review suggestions from pair-review, triages validity, applies fixes to actionable ones, and reports summary. Use to address AI feedback after pair-review analysis.
npx claudepluginhub in-the-loop-labs/pair-review --plugin pair-reviewHow this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/pair-review:ai-criticThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
Fetch AI-generated suggestions from pair-review and make code changes to address the valid ones.
Fetches human review comments from pair-review for local changes or GitHub PRs and applies code changes to address each one. Useful for iterating on reviewer feedback.
Performs multi-level AI code review (diff isolation, file context, codebase) via parallel Task agents. Standalone for git changes or PRs; triggers on 'analyze my changes' etc.
Addresses code review feedback by validating issues, fixing valid ones, and batch-committing changes. Handles local agent feedback or GitHub PR threads via /fix-code-review-feedback or auto-invocation.
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
Fetch AI-generated suggestions from pair-review and make code changes to address the valid ones.
Determine whether this is a local review or a PR review:
repo and prNumber params.path (absolute cwd) and headSha (git rev-parse HEAD) params.Call mcp__pair-review__get_ai_suggestions with the review context params. This returns suggestions from the latest analysis run by default.
If the user wants suggestions from a specific analysis run, call mcp__pair-review__get_ai_analysis_runs first to list available runs, then pass the appropriate runId to get_ai_suggestions.
Only active and adopted suggestions are included (dismissed ones are excluded).
If no suggestions are returned, tell the user there are no AI suggestions to address.
AI suggestions are not human-curated — apply judgment. For each suggestion:
Use the ai_confidence field as a signal but not a hard threshold — low-confidence suggestions can still be valid.
After processing all suggestions, provide a summary: