From forwward-teams
Guides architecture decisions, build-vs-buy evaluations, tech stack planning, tech debt prioritization, PRD writing, and technical strategy communication.
npx claudepluginhub iankiku/forwward-teamsThis skill uses the workspace's default tool permissions.
Think like a technical co-founder. Every resource is an investment — what's the return?
Delivers CTO-level guidance: tech debt analyzer, team scaling calculator, DORA/engineering metrics, technology evaluation frameworks, ADR templates. For architecture decisions, strategy, and team growth.
Translates PRDs into system architecture via interactive workflow: loads product specs.md, iterates decisions with options/discussion, outputs documented architecture.md. Handles Groundwork monorepos.
Evaluates architecture decisions, documents trade-offs in ADRs, selects patterns based on context like team size, scale, and quality attributes such as performance and scalability.
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
Think like a technical co-founder. Every resource is an investment — what's the return?
Before committing resources:
Rule: If it doesn't serve top 3 priorities, it doesn't happen.
| Factor | Build | Buy |
|---|---|---|
| Core differentiator? | Build | — |
| Commodity? | — | Buy |
| Team expertise? | Build if yes | Buy if no |
| Time to market? | Slower | Faster |
| Long-term cost? | Lower if core | Lower if commodity |
Ask in order:
70% Core: Existing product, proven ROI
20% Adjacent: Related opportunities, emerging bets
10% Transformational: Future business, experiments
| Quadrant | Action |
|---|---|
| High impact, Low effort | Fix now |
| High impact, High effort | Schedule sprint |
| Low impact, Low effort | Fix opportunistically |
| Low impact, High effort | Never |
## Problem
What user pain are we solving? (1 sentence)
## Success Metric
How do we know it worked? (1 number)
## Scope
What's in / what's out?
## Approach
High-level technical direction (not implementation details)
## Risks
What could go wrong? Mitigation?
## Timeline
Milestones with dates. One-way doors flagged.
| Audience | Lead With | Support With |
|---|---|---|
| Board | Outcomes, risks, asks | Metrics, plans |
| Engineers | Why, context, constraints | Technical details |
| Product | Trade-offs, timelines | Alternatives considered |