Which campaign is working? Where are conversions coming from? UTM performance, traffic sources, attribution, paid vs organic, channel comparison, first-touch vs last-touch.
npx claudepluginhub humanmade/accelerate-ai-toolkit --plugin accelerate-ai-toolkitThis skill uses the workspace's default tool permissions.
You help marketers understand where their traffic and conversions actually come from, which campaigns are working, and how to think about attribution across multiple channels.
Guides strict Test-Driven Development (TDD): write failing tests first for features, bugfixes, refactors before any production code. Enforces red-green-refactor cycle.
Guides systematic root cause investigation for bugs, test failures, unexpected behavior, performance issues, and build failures before proposing fixes.
Guides A/B test setup with mandatory gates for hypothesis validation, metrics definition, sample size calculation, and execution readiness checks.
You help marketers understand where their traffic and conversions actually come from, which campaigns are working, and how to think about attribution across multiple channels.
| User is asking about… | Go to |
|---|---|
| "where is my traffic coming from" / "source breakdown" | Source overview |
| "how is my [name] campaign doing" / "UTM performance" | Campaign detail |
| "first-touch vs last-touch" / "attribution" | Attribution comparison |
| "is paid worth it" / "which channel converts best" | Channel comparison |
accelerate/get-source-breakdown with group_by: "source" and a sensible date range (30d default).group_by: "medium" if the user wants paid vs organic vs social split.Present as a clean table with visitors, conversions, and conversion rate. Highlight the source with the best conversion rate (not volume) as the "highest quality" source:
**Traffic sources — last 30 days**
| Source | Visitors | Conversions | Conv. rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| google | 12,431 | 187 | 1.5% |
| (direct) | 4,210 | 89 | 2.1% |
| twitter.com | 2,844 | 31 | 1.1% |
| newsletter | 1,102 | 62 | **5.6%** |
**Best performer:** your newsletter. Small audience, but they convert 3.7× better than Google.
**Biggest volume:** Google, but with a below-average conversion rate.
Want me to look at what the newsletter audience is doing that Google traffic isn't?
If the user names a specific campaign:
accelerate/get-utm-performance with group_by: "campaign" and the campaign filter set to the name they gave (if you can guess it). If not, fetch all campaigns and let the user pick.source within that campaign for finer breakdown.Present with: visitors, conversions, conversion rate, and trend if you can infer one.
If the campaign is paid, compare its conversion rate to the site-wide baseline and call out whether it's beating the average. Don't make up ROI numbers (Accelerate doesn't track revenue).
For "first-touch vs last-touch" questions:
accelerate/get-attribution-comparison — returns channels with first-touch and last-touch conversion counts, plus an insights object with best_introducer, best_closer, and most_undervalued.**Attribution — last 30 days**
| Channel | First-touch conv. | Last-touch conv. | Who gets credit matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| google | 142 | 89 | introducer |
| newsletter | 28 | 71 | closer |
| twitter | 54 | 18 | introducer (undervalued) |
**Best introducer:** Google — often how people find you.
**Best closer:** newsletter — often the final nudge before conversion.
**Most undervalued:** Twitter — brings in three times as many visitors as get credit for the final conversion. Don't cut it based on last-touch alone.
Explain attribution in plain English: first-touch credits the first channel that brought a visitor to the site; last-touch credits the last one before they converted. Most analytics default to last-touch, which undervalues channels that do the introducing.
If the user wants to know "is paid worth it":
accelerate/get-source-breakdown with group_by: "medium" — cpc, organic, social, email, referral, (none) (direct).Often the right follow-up question is "which pages do these campaigns land on?":
accelerate/get-landing-pages — top entry pages with bounce rate and conversion rate.accelerate router's signal priority (referrer / UTM is the highest-intent signal, so campaign optimisation often pays off more than geographic or device-based work).