Skill

multi-network-readiness

From arb

Compares a website's readiness for ad networks like AdSense, Ezoic, Mediavine, Raptive, and Amazon Publisher Services via traffic, content quality, brand safety, and technical checks.

performance

monitoring

npx claudepluginhub huifer/adsense-readiness-benchmark --plugin arb

Tool Access

This skill uses the workspace's default tool permissions.

Preview

Assess whether a site is only AdSense-ready or also positioned for stronger monetization networks with different quality, traffic, and brand-safety thresholds.

SKILL.md

Similar Skills

strategic-compact

179.0k

Suggests manual /compact at logical task boundaries in long Claude Code sessions and multi-phase tasks to avoid arbitrary auto-compaction losses.

1 file

ecc

Stats

Stars6

Forks3

Last CommitMay 3, 2026

Actions

View Source View Plugin View on GitHub View README

Help us improve

Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.

Multi-Network Readiness

Assess whether a site is only AdSense-ready or also positioned for stronger monetization networks with different quality, traffic, and brand-safety thresholds.

Quick Start

Input: Website URL, site type, geography, monthly traffic, primary traffic sources
Output: Network-by-network readiness matrix + gap analysis + upgrade roadmap
Time: 20-40 minutes

Networks Covered

Google AdSense
Ezoic
Mediavine
Raptive
Amazon Publisher Services (APS)

Review Areas

Content quality and consistency
Traffic level and traffic source mix
Brand safety and advertiser suitability
UX and ad density tolerance
Trust signals and editorial maturity
Technical stability and performance

Output Contract

Return a matrix with:

network
eligibility_status: ready / near_ready / not_ready / unknown
blocking_requirements
score_gap
estimated_time_to_eligibility
highest_leverage_fixes

Typical Threshold Guidance

AdSense

Entry-level publisher acceptance
Strong policy compliance required
No fixed traffic threshold, but weak sites still fail

Ezoic

Lower traffic barrier than premium networks
Strong technical integration tolerance needed
Better fit for growth-stage publishers

Mediavine

Common rule of thumb: 50K+ sessions with stronger editorial quality
High bar on brand safety, consistency, and audience quality

Raptive

Often 100K+ pageviews/session-equivalent benchmarks in practice
High editorial and advertiser quality expectations

APS

Better fit for larger publishers with monetization operations maturity
Requires stronger stability, scale, and operational sophistication

Strategic Use

Use this skill to answer:

Should this publisher apply only to AdSense now?
Which network is the next step after AdSense?
What fixes improve both approval odds and future RPM?

Routing

If traffic is below premium thresholds → revenue-potential-estimator
If quality gaps are content-led → content-improvement-blueprint
If trust and policy are the blockers → trust-credibility-strategy, policy-remediation-plan
If multiple sites are being compared → agency-batch-auditor