Help us improve
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
Use when implementation is complete, all tests pass, and it is time to decide how to integrate the work into the main branch
npx claudepluginhub harmaalbers/claude-requirements-framework --plugin requirements-frameworkHow this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/requirements-framework:finishing-a-development-branchThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
Guide completion of development work by presenting clear options and handling chosen workflow.
Guides completion of development work by verifying tests and presenting structured options for merging, creating a PR, or cleaning up the branch.
Guides completion of a development branch by verifying tests, presenting options (merge locally, push/PR, keep, discard), and executing with cleanup.
Guides completion of development work by verifying tests, presenting structured options (merge, PR, keep, discard), and executing the chosen workflow with cleanup.
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
Guide completion of development work by presenting clear options and handling chosen workflow.
Core principle: Verify tests → Present options → Execute choice → Clean up.
Announce at start: "I'm using the finishing-a-development-branch skill to complete this work."
Before presenting options, verify tests pass:
# Run project's test suite
pytest / python -m pytest / npm test / cargo test / go test ./...
If tests fail:
Tests failing (<N> failures). Must fix before completing:
[Show failures]
Cannot proceed with merge/PR until tests pass.
Stop. Don't proceed to Step 2.
If tests pass: Continue to Step 2.
# Try common base branches
git merge-base HEAD main 2>/dev/null || git merge-base HEAD master 2>/dev/null
Or ask: "This branch split from main — is that correct?"
Present exactly these 4 options:
Implementation complete. What would you like to do?
1. Merge back to <base-branch> locally
2. Push and create a Pull Request
3. Keep the branch as-is (I'll handle it later)
4. Discard this work
Which option?
Don't add explanation — keep options concise.
git checkout <base-branch>
git pull
git merge <feature-branch>
# Verify tests on merged result
<test command>
# If tests pass
git branch -d <feature-branch>
Then: Cleanup worktree (Step 5)
Before creating the PR, run /deep-review to satisfy the pre_pr_review requirement.
git push -u origin <feature-branch>
gh pr create --title "<title>" --body "$(cat <<'EOF'
## Summary
<2-3 bullets of what changed>
## Test Plan
- [ ] <verification steps>
EOF
)"
Then: Cleanup worktree (Step 5)
Report: "Keeping branch . Worktree preserved at ."
Don't cleanup worktree.
Confirm first:
This will permanently delete:
- Branch <name>
- All commits: <commit-list>
- Worktree at <path>
Type 'discard' to confirm.
Wait for exact confirmation.
If confirmed:
git checkout <base-branch>
git branch -D <feature-branch>
Then: Cleanup worktree (Step 5)
For Options 1, 2, 4:
Check if in worktree:
git worktree list | grep $(git branch --show-current)
If yes:
git worktree remove <worktree-path>
For Option 3: Keep worktree.
| Option | Merge | Push | Keep Worktree | Cleanup Branch |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Merge locally | Yes | - | - | Yes |
| 2. Create PR | - | Yes | Yes | - |
| 3. Keep as-is | - | - | Yes | - |
| 4. Discard | - | - | - | Yes (force) |
Never:
Always:
/deep-review before creating PR (Option 2)Called by:
requirements-framework:subagent-driven-development — After all tasks completerequirements-framework:executing-plans — After all batches completePairs with:
requirements-framework:using-git-worktrees — Cleans up worktree created by that skillrequirements-framework:verification-before-completion — Verify before claiming done