Help us improve
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
From sdd
Designs a data model and generates paired forward/rollback SQL migrations in one pass, staged under docs/features/<slug>/migrations/. Stack-agnostic and follows the repo's own DB conventions. Useful during feature design before implementation begins.
npx claudepluginhub genkovich/sdd --plugin sddHow this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/sdd:data-modelinheritThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
End-to-end runner for the persistence cut: data model + migrations + drift check in one pass. Greenfield-first by default; brownfield delta as `--mode brownfield`. Output is **shippable** — full `.up.sql` + `.down.sql`, not a plan — but **staged under `docs/features/<slug>/migrations/`, never written into the live `migrations/` tree.** `implement` **promotes** the staged pair into `migrations/`...
Generates data model documentation including tables, constraints, indexes, retention policies, and migration notes from entities or PRD references.
Generates database migrations with schema changes and rollback, detecting framework (Knex, Prisma, TypeORM, raw SQL) and validating safety.
Guides schema design, migration safety, and ORM analysis. Detects database engine and ORM, evaluates normalization and indexing, and validates backward compatibility.
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
End-to-end runner for the persistence cut: data model + migrations + drift check in one pass. Greenfield-first by default; brownfield delta as --mode brownfield. Output is shippable — full .up.sql + .down.sql, not a plan — but staged under docs/features/<slug>/migrations/, never written into the live migrations/ tree. implement promotes the staged pair into migrations/ (with the real sequence number / timestamp) only when the feature is actually being built. This is deliberate: data-model is a design stage four steps before implement, so a stray migrate up (a teammate's loop, CI, a deploy) must not be able to apply a half-designed schema to a real database. (Same staging discipline the drift fixes already use under _drift/.)
Stack-agnostic by design — it imposes no DB philosophy and writes no rules file. data-model derives the DB + migration conventions from the architecture — architecture-map.md (the migration tool/naming survey recorded) + the sad.md persistence decisions (§4 strategy / §5 building blocks / §8 crosscutting) + the Accepted ADRs — and follows them; the live migrations/ + schema corroborate and fill anything the architecture left implicit. On a greenfield repo with no architecture signal, it confirms each schema choice with the user (Socratic) instead of defaulting to a house style. What it applies regardless of stack is migration safety (staging, reversibility, FK indexes, zero-downtime decomposition, no-PII) — never a stance on updated_at vs not, hard vs soft delete, UUID vs sequence, or whether CHECK constraints are allowed. The size matrix (→ ../_shared/size-matrix.md) governs how much you produce; the aggregate-roots dialogue uses ../_shared/ask-style.md.
Backend Lead.
<slug> — feature slug.docs/features/<slug>/spec.md (entities live in §5 acceptance criteria) and docs/features/<slug>/sad.md (§6.4 ER stub). Missing → «run specify / design first».sad.md §6 — each writes/reads <entity> note is an index candidate (one index per query, justified).docs/architecture-map.md §Migrations (from survey) + the sad.md persistence decisions (§4/§5/§8) + Accepted ADRs — the migration tool/naming + the DB approach are derived from here, not invented (the map also gives module layout, saving a re-scan). For drift detection specifically, explorer still reads the actual domain layer (the map gives layout; drift needs the real struct/field source). Stack-agnostic — no hard-coded path or language.data-model imposes no DB philosophy. For each topic below it follows the architecture's decision — architecture-map.md §Migrations + the sad.md persistence decisions + Accepted ADRs — corroborated by the repo's existing migrations/schema; on a greenfield repo with no signal it confirms the choice with the user. It never legislates a house style.
| Topic | How data-model decides |
|---|---|
| Naming (tables / columns) | Follow the repo's convention (detected from existing migrations + schema); greenfield → confirm. |
| PK strategy | Follow the repo (UUID / bigint-identity / sequence / composite — whatever it uses); greenfield → confirm. |
Audit columns (created_at / updated_at / …) | Match the repo's pattern; greenfield → confirm. No stance imposed either way. |
| Delete strategy (hard / soft / status) | Match the repo; greenfield → confirm. |
Constraints (CHECK / TRIGGER / DB DEFAULT) | Use them iff the repo does; never add or forbid them by fiat. |
| String / JSON types | Match the repo's norms (VARCHAR(N) / TEXT / JSON); greenfield → confirm. |
What it does apply regardless of stack — migration safety, not DB philosophy:
| Mechanic | Why (stack-agnostic) |
|---|---|
Staged as docs/features/<slug>/migrations/<NN>_<verb>_<entity>.up.sql + .down.sql (NN = feature-local ordinal), promoted by implement (real number/timestamp assigned at promote-time) | Keeps the live tree free of half-designed schema; late numbering avoids early-grab collisions. |
Idempotent DDL where the tool supports it (IF NOT EXISTS, ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING on seeds) | Re-running a partially-applied migration does not error. |
A .down for every .up (full reversibility) | Rollback is always possible. |
| An index on every FK + one index per real query (from the sequences) | Universal performance hygiene — no "just in case" indexes. |
| Breaking change on an existing table → expand → backfill → contract | Zero-downtime, any DB. |
No real-looking PII in seeds (example.test) | Safety. |
spec.md and sad.md present, else refuse with a pointer to the missing one.architecture-map.md §Migrations (the tool/naming survey recorded) + the sad.md persistence decisions (§4 strategy / §5 building blocks / §8 crosscutting) + the Accepted ADRs first — they choose the migration tool/naming + the DB approach (PK / audit / delete / constraints). Corroborate with the live migrations/ folder + schema (Explore or ls) for anything the architecture left implicit — e.g. statement-per-file rules (golang-migrate's transaction-per-file), the next sequence value. Record the migration naming as a promote-time hint in the audit report (e.g. «sequential, next ≈ 000023 — implement assigns the real number at promotion, since another feature may promote first»). On a greenfield repo with no architecture signal, the schema choices are confirmed with the user (steps 4–6), not defaulted to a house style. Do not pick a final number, do not write into the live migrations/, and do not impose a convention the architecture/repo doesn't use — staging happens in step 9, promotion in implement; flag any divergence (architecture vs repo) in the report.sad.md §6 sequences (each write/read note → an index candidate) → (optional) the Explore-discovered domain layer for a struct-vs-DDL map.../_shared/ask-style.md.VARCHAR(N) sized from AC validation limits / TEXT / JSON, as the repo does); audit columns (created_at / updated_at / none) per the repo's pattern; CHECK / DB DEFAULT / triggers iff the repo uses them; <!-- TBD --> where honestly undecided. On greenfield, confirm these with the user.docs/features/<slug>/data-model.md from ./templates/data-model.md: ER Mermaid (clean ordered block) + entity tables per aggregate + indexes table. Validate the erDiagram per ../_shared/mermaid-check.md (render-parse with mmdc if available, else the structural lint — valid cardinality glyphs + type name attribute lines; fix before continuing).docs/features/<slug>/migrations/ with a feature-local ordinal name (01_create_<entity>.up.sql + .down.sql, 02_…) that preserves intra-feature order. The SQL is full and shippable; only the location + the final number differ from a live migration. Never write into the repo's live migrations/ here — implement promotes these (assigning the real sequence number / timestamp per the convention detected in step 2, in ordinal order) when it runs the layer: migration task. The SQL content rules are unchanged:
<entity> .up.sql + .down.sql per entity (or per small aggregate). IF NOT EXISTS everywhere; ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING on seeds.ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING; test fixtures → NOT in migrations/ — generate them in the form the repo uses (factory functions / fixtures / builders), documented under "Test fixtures". PII guard (hard): no real-looking email/name/phone in any seed — use admin@example.test, user-<uuid>@example.test, Test User.--drift-only short-circuits here). If the Explore subagent found a domain layer, map each field to a column and report field-without-column / column-without-field / type-mismatch / nullability-mismatch; auto-propose fix migrations under _drift/ for the user to review.REFERENCES other(id) has an index on the FK column); convention adherence (the schema follows the repo's detected conventions — flag any deliberate divergence in the report, never silently impose a house style). Any failure → fix or surface, never silent-commit.docs/features/<slug>/_audit/data-model-<date>.md: the staged migration files (their docs/features/<slug>/migrations/<NN>_* paths), the promote-time convention hint (e.g. «repo is sequential, next ≈ 000024 — implement assigns the real number at promotion»), convention deviations, drift findings, breaking-change decompositions, every <!-- TBD -->. State plainly: «migrations are staged — not yet in the live migrations/ tree; implement promotes them». Next stage api <slug>.data-model: <slug> (data-model.md + staged migrations). Then emit the stage-handoff block per ../_shared/handoff.md — What I did + Review (data-model.md, staged migrations/) + Run next (/clear, then /sdd:api <slug>).data-model.md exists with ER + every entity + every index carrying a query justification..up.sql + .down.sql pair exists under docs/features/<slug>/migrations/ (staged, feature-local ordinal names) — nothing was written into the live migrations/ tree (that's implement's promotion step). The SQL still follows the repo's detected convention._drift/*.sql) if drift was detected.updated_at / no-CHECK on a repo that does otherwise, or writing a .claude/rules/migrations.md to legislate one. data-model detects and follows the repo's conventions; if a repo uses CHECK constraints or updated_at, match it.example.test.migrations/ tree at design time. That drops a half-designed, runnable schema where a stray migrate up (CI, a teammate's loop, a deploy) can apply it before the feature is built or reviewed — and grabs a sequence number early, colliding with other in-flight features. Stage under docs/features/<slug>/migrations/; implement promotes it (with the real number) when the code that needs it is actually being written../templates/data-model.md — output structure for the design doc.