Help us improve
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
From Pipefy
Analyzes existing Pipefy pipes for automation gaps, manual bottlenecks, missing AI agents, and field conditions. Diagnoses and improves processes in progressive rounds.
npx claudepluginhub pipefy/ai-toolkit --plugin pipefyHow this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/pipefy:pipefy-process-intelligenceThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
Analyze existing pipes for improvement opportunities and implement them progressively. **Investigate immediately. Diagnose with data. Improve progressively.**
Guides users through process discovery, component selection, and design principles for Pipefy — use when the user needs architecture consulting, not direct execution.
Guides through a 5-question workflow intake then audits Gmail, Calendar, Slack, and task trackers to identify automation opportunities ranked by impact and effort.
Analyzes business processes to map steps, identify waste like waiting and handoffs, recommend eliminations/automation/parallelization, and estimate time/cost savings.
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
Analyze existing pipes for improvement opportunities and implement them progressively. Investigate immediately. Diagnose with data. Improve progressively.
The user asks to analyze or improve an existing process:
Not for: designing a new process from scratch → use skills/process-design/.
search_pipes).Get pipe structure:
MCP: get_pipe pipe_id=<id>
Capture: phases, field count per phase, automation count.
Sample recent cards (last 30–50):
MCP: get_cards pipe_id=<id> first=50 include_fields=true
Look for: stale cards (no updates), cards stuck in early phases, phases with 0 cards.
Check automations:
MCP: get_automations pipe_id=<id>
Look for: phases with no automations (manual handoffs), repeated manual steps.
Check AI configuration:
MCP: get_ai_agents repo_uuid=<PIPE_UUID>
Look for: no AI agents despite manual categorization or triage patterns.
| Signal | Opportunity |
|---|---|
| Cards stuck in a phase for >7 days | Add due date field + overdue automation |
| Phase transitions always done by same person | Automate the transition condition |
| Fields never filled in certain phases | Remove or make optional |
| Same comment posted repeatedly | AI agent to auto-post based on trigger |
| No automation between intake and first action | Add "notify assignee" automation on card creation |
| Large field count on start form | Move optional fields to later phases |
| Phases with 0 cards over 90 days | Consider removing or merging phases |
Each round focuses on 1–2 improvements; report results before proceeding.
Example: add an overdue automation
Identify the stalled phase and threshold (e.g., "Under Review" > 3 days).
Check automation events: get_automation_events
Create the automation:
MCP: create_automation pipe_id=<id> name="Overdue Alert" trigger_event="card_overdue" actions='[{"type":"send_email","to":"assignee"}]'
Report: "Added overdue automation to 'Under Review' phase — triggers after 3 days and emails the assignee."
Example: add a field condition
Identify a field that should only show when another field has a specific value.
Create the condition:
MCP: create_field_condition pipe_id=<id> phase_id=<phase_id> action="show" when='{"field_id":"<f1>","value":"Yes"}' fields='["<f2>"]'
## Analysis — [Pipe Name]
### Findings
- [Finding 1]: [evidence from tool calls]
- [Finding 2]: ...
### Implemented this round
- [Change 1]: [tool called + result]
### Next round (if approved)
- [Opportunity]: [proposed action]
get_pipe and get_cards after each round).get_cards returns empty: pipe may have no cards yet — analyze structure only and recommend first card creation.create_automation fails with unknown event: use get_automation_events to list valid triggers.skills/automations/ — detailed automation creation guide.skills/ai-agents/ — add conversational agents for user-facing automation.skills/observability/ — check credit and execution data to quantify improvement impact.