npx claudepluginhub frank-luongt/faos-skills-marketplace --plugin faos-ceoThis skill uses the workspace's default tool permissions.
Guides Next.js Cache Components and Partial Prerendering (PPR) with cacheComponents enabled. Implements 'use cache', cacheLife(), cacheTag(), revalidateTag(), static/dynamic optimization, and cache debugging.
Migrates code, prompts, and API calls from Claude Sonnet 4.0/4.5 or Opus 4.1 to Opus 4.5, updating model strings on Anthropic, AWS, GCP, Azure platforms.
Analyzes BMad project state from catalog CSV, configs, artifacts, and query to recommend next skills or answer questions. Useful for help requests, 'what next', or starting BMad.
A structured 9-section framework for defining, validating, and communicating product strategy — covering everything from vision to defensibility.
Product strategy is the most under-documented artifact in most organizations. Teams have a roadmap (what to build) but not a strategy (why and how to win). This canvas forces explicit answers to the nine questions every product strategy must address.
The aspirational future state your product enables.
Answer:
Format: 1–2 sentences, inspirational but grounded.
Good: "Every small business can understand their finances as well as a Fortune 500 CFO." Bad: "Be the best accounting software." (generic, not aspirational)
Who you serve — defined by problems and jobs, not demographics.
For each segment:
| Field | Description |
|---|---|
| Segment name | Descriptive label |
| Size | Estimated TAM/SAM for this segment |
| Primary JTBD | The job they're hiring your product to do |
| Current solution | How they solve this today |
| Switching motivation | Why they'd switch to you |
| Priority | Primary / Secondary / Future |
Rules:
What you offer that's uniquely valuable — structured as a before/after narrative.
Template per segment:
FOR [target segment]
WHO [have this problem / need]
OUR PRODUCT [category]
PROVIDES [key benefit]
UNLIKE [current alternative]
WE [key differentiator]
Also answer:
Strategy is as much about what you refuse to do as what you choose to do.
Explicitly state:
Format:
| We will NOT... | Because... |
|---|---|
| Build an enterprise version | Our advantage is simplicity; enterprise complexity would erode it |
| Compete on price | We differentiate on value, not cost |
| Support on-premise deployment | Cloud-only keeps our iteration speed high |
How you measure strategic progress — not feature metrics, but business health.
Define:
North Star: [metric] — currently [baseline], target [goal]
OMTM (this quarter): [metric]
Input metrics: [2-3 metrics]
Guardrails: [2-3 metrics]
How you acquire, retain, and expand customers.
Answer:
Where you sit in the market relative to alternatives.
Map on two dimensions most relevant to your market:
For each key competitor:
| Competitor | Positioning | Strength | Weakness | Your advantage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [name] | [position] | [strength] | [weakness] | [your edge] |
What you need to build or acquire to execute the strategy.
Categories:
For each capability:
| Capability | Current State | Gap | Build / Buy / Partner |
|---|---|---|---|
| [capability] | [status] | [what's missing] | [approach] |
What makes your position sustainable over time — why can't competitors just copy you?
Common moat types:
| Moat Type | Description | Your Status |
|---|---|---|
| Network effects | Product gets better as more people use it | [status] |
| Switching costs | Hard for customers to leave once they start | [status] |
| Data advantages | Proprietary data that improves the product | [status] |
| Brand / trust | Reputation that takes years to build | [status] |
| Economies of scale | Cost advantages from scale | [status] |
| Regulatory / IP | Patents, licenses, regulatory approval | [status] |
Be honest: If you don't have a moat yet, say so — and identify which one you're building toward.
# Product Strategy Canvas — [Product Name]
**Last updated:** [date]
**Owner:** [name/role]
**Review cadence:** [quarterly / bi-annually]
---
## 1. Vision
[1-2 sentences]
## 2. Market Segments
[Segment table]
## 3. Value Proposition
[Before/After narrative per segment]
## 4. Trade-offs
[What we will NOT do table]
## 5. Key Metrics
[North Star, OMTM, inputs, guardrails]
## 6. Growth Strategy
[Acquisition, retention, expansion, unit economics]
## 7. Competitive Position
[Positioning map + competitor table]
## 8. Key Capabilities
[Build/buy/partner table]
## 9. Defensibility
[Moat assessment]
---
## Critical Hypotheses to Validate
1. [Assumption that if wrong, would change the strategy]
2. [Assumption that if wrong, would change the strategy]
## Strategy Review Schedule
- Next review: [date]
- Key decision points: [what could trigger an off-cycle review]
After completing the canvas, verify:
| Avoid | Why | Instead |
|---|---|---|
| Strategy without trade-offs | If you're not saying no to anything, it's not a strategy | Force 3+ explicit "we will NOT" statements |
| Vision that's a tagline | "Best-in-class X" isn't a vision | Describe the future state you're enabling |
| Too many primary segments | Can't serve everyone well | Pick ONE primary, others are secondary |
| Metrics without baselines | Can't measure progress without a starting point | Always include current values |
| Strategy doc nobody reads | Strategy only works if it's shared | Present, discuss, revisit quarterly |
| Copying competitor strategy | You'll always be behind | Find your unique angle |