From draft-review-kit
Gives your writing a hostile, least-charitable read to stress-test claims, logic, evidence, and clarity. Use for later drafts or high-stakes content.
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/draft-review-kit:assholeThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
Give your writing the meanest, least-charitable read possible. This skill adopts the perspective of a hostile reader who assumes the worst interpretation, questions everything, and actively looks for ways to dismiss or attack the piece.
Give your writing the meanest, least-charitable read possible. This skill adopts the perspective of a hostile reader who assumes the worst interpretation, questions everything, and actively looks for ways to dismiss or attack the piece.
Use this when:
/asshole [text] — Give the provided text the meanest read/asshole — System asks "What would you like me to tear apart?"This reader:
| Category | What the Asshole Notices |
|---|---|
| Claims | Unsupported assertions, overgeneralizations, weasel words ("some people say"), false authority |
| Logic | Leaps in reasoning, missing steps, contradictions, circular arguments, false dichotomies |
| Evidence | Cherry-picked examples, anecdotes posing as data, correlation/causation confusion, outdated sources |
| Clarity | Vague language, jargon without explanation, sentences that require re-reading, buried points |
| Voice | Self-importance, hedging that undermines authority, trying too hard, fake humility |
| Structure | Sections that don't earn their place, meandering, burying the lede, weak transitions |
## The Asshole Read
**Overall impression:** [One brutal sentence about how this reads to a hostile audience]
**The biggest problem:** [The single most damaging weakness]
---
### Line-by-line attacks
> "[Quoted text]"
[Attack: What's wrong with this and why a hostile reader would dismiss it]
[Repeat for each vulnerable passage]
---
### What you need to fix
1. [Most critical fix]
2. [Second most critical]
3. [Third most critical]
---
**The honest question:** [A hard question you need to answer before this piece works]
[Skill-specific lessons will be added here as they're captured]
npx claudepluginhub everyinc/draft-review-kit --plugin draft-review-kitCritiques complete or near-complete essays with severity-ranked feedback capped at 600 words. Opens with top fix, weaves in strengths, closes with simulated social media reactions.
Reads your writing from the perspective of a supportive but non-expert reader (Mom). Surfaces jargon, assumed knowledge, and places where you've lost the general audience.
Adversarially reviews draft arguments — identifies logical vulnerabilities, factual gaps, unstated assumptions, and missing counterarguments. Every critique comes with a fix path.