Stats
Actions
Tags
'%20stop-opacity%3D'0.16'%2F%3E%3Cstop%20offset%3D'1'%20stop-color%3D'rgb(200%2C90%2C60)'%20stop-opacity%3D'0.03'%2F%3E%3C%2FlinearGradient%3E%3C%2Fdefs%3E%3Crect%20width%3D'320'%20height%3D'200'%20fill%3D'url(%23g)'%2F%3E%3Ccircle%20cx%3D'250'%20cy%3D'56'%20r%3D'92'%20fill%3D'rgb(200%2C90%2C60)'%20fill-opacity%3D'0.06'%2F%3E%3Ccircle%20cx%3D'64'%20cy%3D'172'%20r%3D'58'%20fill%3D'rgb(200%2C90%2C60)'%20fill-opacity%3D'0.05'%2F%3E%3C%2Fsvg%3E)
From sales
Research your competitors and build an interactive battlecard. Outputs an HTML artifact with clickable competitor cards and a comparison matrix. Trigger with "competitive intel", "research competitors", "how do we compare to [competitor]", "battlecard for [competitor]", or "what's new with [competitor]".
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/sales:competitive-intelligenceThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
Research your competitors extensively and generate an **interactive HTML battlecard** you can use in deals. The output is a self-contained artifact with clickable competitor tabs and an overall comparison matrix.
Research your competitors extensively and generate an interactive HTML battlecard you can use in deals. The output is a self-contained artifact with clickable competitor tabs and an overall comparison matrix.
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ COMPETITIVE INTELLIGENCE │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ ALWAYS (works standalone via web search) │
│ ✓ Competitor product deep-dive: features, pricing, positioning │
│ ✓ Recent releases: what they've shipped in last 90 days │
│ ✓ Your company releases: what you've shipped to counter │
│ ✓ Differentiation matrix: where you win vs. where they win │
│ ✓ Sales talk tracks: how to position against each competitor │
│ ✓ Landmine questions: expose their weaknesses naturally │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ OUTPUT: Interactive HTML Battlecard │
│ ✓ Comparison matrix overview │
│ ✓ Clickable tabs for each competitor │
│ ✓ Dark theme, professional styling │
│ ✓ Self-contained HTML file — share or host anywhere │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ SUPERCHARGED (when you connect your tools) │
│ + CRM: Win/loss data, competitor mentions in closed deals │
│ + Docs: Existing battlecards, competitive playbooks │
│ + Chat: Internal intel, field reports from colleagues │
│ + Transcripts: Competitor mentions in customer calls │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
When you run this skill, I'll ask for context:
Required:
Optional:
If I already have your seller context from a previous session, I'll confirm and skip the questions.
| Connector | What It Adds |
|---|---|
| CRM | Win/loss history against each competitor, deal-level competitor tracking |
| Docs | Existing battlecards, product comparison docs, competitive playbooks |
| Chat | Internal chat intel (e.g. Slack) — what your team is hearing from the field |
| Transcripts | Competitor mentions in customer calls, objections raised |
No connectors? Web research works great. I'll pull everything from public sources — product pages, pricing, blogs, release notes, reviews, job postings.
The skill generates a self-contained HTML file with:
Overview comparing you vs. all competitors at a glance:
Each competitor gets a clickable card that expands to show:
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<title>Battlecard: [Your Company] vs Competitors</title>
<style>
/* Dark theme, professional styling */
/* Tabbed navigation */
/* Expandable cards */
/* Responsive design */
</style>
</head>
<body>
<!-- Header with your company + date -->
<header>
<h1>[Your Company] Competitive Battlecard</h1>
<p>Generated: [Date] | Competitors: [List]</p>
</header>
<!-- Tab Navigation -->
<nav class="tabs">
<button class="tab active" data-tab="matrix">Comparison Matrix</button>
<button class="tab" data-tab="competitor-1">[Competitor 1]</button>
<button class="tab" data-tab="competitor-2">[Competitor 2]</button>
<button class="tab" data-tab="competitor-3">[Competitor 3]</button>
</nav>
<!-- Comparison Matrix Tab -->
<section id="matrix" class="tab-content active">
<h2>Head-to-Head Comparison</h2>
<table class="comparison-matrix">
<!-- Feature rows with you vs each competitor -->
</table>
<h2>Quick Win/Loss Guide</h2>
<div class="win-loss-grid">
<!-- Per-competitor: when you win, when you lose -->
</div>
</section>
<!-- Individual Competitor Tabs -->
<section id="competitor-1" class="tab-content">
<div class="battlecard">
<div class="profile"><!-- Company info --></div>
<div class="differentiation"><!-- Where they win / you win --></div>
<div class="talk-tracks"><!-- Scenario-based positioning --></div>
<div class="objections"><!-- Common objections + responses --></div>
<div class="landmines"><!-- Questions to ask --></div>
</div>
</section>
<script>
// Tab switching logic
// Expand/collapse sections
</script>
</body>
</html>
:root {
/* Dark theme base */
--bg-primary: #0a0d14;
--bg-elevated: #0f131c;
--bg-surface: #161b28;
--bg-hover: #1e2536;
/* Text */
--text-primary: #ffffff;
--text-secondary: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.7);
--text-muted: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.5);
/* Accent (your brand or neutral) */
--accent: #3b82f6;
--accent-hover: #2563eb;
/* Status indicators */
--you-win: #10b981;
--they-win: #ef4444;
--tie: #f59e0b;
}
If first time:
1. Ask: "What company do you work for?"
2. Ask: "What do you sell? (product/service in one line)"
3. Ask: "Who are your main competitors? (up to 5)"
4. Store context for future sessions
If returning user:
1. Confirm: "Still at [Company] selling [Product]?"
2. Ask: "Same competitors, or any new ones to add?"
Web searches:
1. "[Your company] product" — current offerings
2. "[Your company] pricing" — pricing model
3. "[Your company] news" — recent announcements (90 days)
4. "[Your company] product updates OR changelog OR releases" — what you've shipped
5. "[Your company] vs [competitor]" — existing comparisons
For each competitor, run:
1. "[Competitor] product features" — what they offer
2. "[Competitor] pricing" — how they charge
3. "[Competitor] news" — recent announcements
4. "[Competitor] product updates OR changelog OR releases" — what they've shipped
5. "[Competitor] reviews G2 OR Capterra OR TrustRadius" — customer sentiment
6. "[Competitor] vs [alternatives]" — how they position
7. "[Competitor] customers" — who uses them
8. "[Competitor] careers" — hiring signals (growth areas)
If CRM connected:
1. Query closed-won deals with competitor field = [Competitor]
2. Query closed-lost deals with competitor field = [Competitor]
3. Extract win/loss patterns
If docs connected:
1. Search for "battlecard [competitor]"
2. Search for "competitive [competitor]"
3. Pull existing positioning docs
If chat connected:
1. Search for "[Competitor]" mentions (last 90 days)
2. Extract field intel and colleague insights
If transcripts connected:
1. Search calls for "[Competitor]" mentions
2. Extract objections and customer quotes
1. Structure data for each competitor
2. Build comparison matrix
3. Generate individual battlecards
4. Create talk tracks for each scenario
5. Compile landmine questions
6. Render as self-contained HTML
7. Save as [YourCompany]-battlecard-[date].html
competitor:
name: "[Name]"
website: "[URL]"
profile:
founded: "[Year]"
funding: "[Stage + amount]"
employees: "[Count]"
target_market: "[Who they sell to]"
pricing_model: "[Per seat / usage / etc.]"
market_position: "[Leader / Challenger / Niche]"
what_they_sell: "[Product summary]"
their_positioning: "[How they describe themselves]"
recent_releases:
- date: "[Date]"
release: "[Feature/Product]"
impact: "[Why it matters]"
where_they_win:
- area: "[Area]"
advantage: "[Their strength]"
how_to_handle: "[Your counter]"
where_you_win:
- area: "[Area]"
advantage: "[Your strength]"
proof_point: "[Evidence]"
pricing:
model: "[How they charge]"
entry_price: "[Starting price]"
enterprise: "[Enterprise pricing]"
hidden_costs: "[Implementation, etc.]"
talk_track: "[How to discuss pricing]"
talk_tracks:
early_mention: "[Strategy if they come up early]"
displacement: "[Strategy if customer uses them]"
late_addition: "[Strategy if added late to eval]"
objections:
- objection: "[What customer says]"
response: "[How to handle]"
landmines:
- "[Question that exposes their weakness]"
win_loss: # If CRM connected
win_rate: "[X]%"
common_win_factors: "[What predicts wins]"
common_loss_factors: "[What predicts losses]"
## ✓ Battlecard Created
[View your battlecard](file:///path/to/[YourCompany]-battlecard-[date].html)
---
**Summary**
- **Your Company**: [Name]
- **Competitors Analyzed**: [List]
- **Data Sources**: Web research [+ CRM] [+ Docs] [+ Transcripts]
---
**How to Use**
- **Before a call**: Open the relevant competitor tab, review talk tracks
- **During a call**: Reference landmine questions
- **After win/loss**: Update with new intel
---
**Sharing Options**
- **Local file**: Open in any browser
- **Host it**: Upload to Netlify, Vercel, or internal wiki
- **Share directly**: Send the HTML file to teammates
---
**Keep it Fresh**
Run this skill again to refresh with latest intel. Recommended: monthly or before major deals.
Competitive intel gets stale. Recommended refresh:
| Trigger | Action |
|---|---|
| Monthly | Quick refresh — new releases, news, pricing changes |
| Before major deal | Deep refresh for specific competitor in that deal |
| After win/loss | Update patterns with new data |
| Competitor announcement | Immediate update on that competitor |
| Competitor | Type | Key Weakness |
|---|---|---|
| Republic Services | National hauler | No transparency, hidden fees, long-haul to distant landfills, no data layer |
| Waste Management Inc | National hauler | Opaque pricing, no per-pound billing, no diversion data, multi-year lock-in contracts |
| Athens Services | Regional (SoCal) | No clean bin swap, limited diversion reporting, inconsistent pickup quality |
| EDCO | Regional (SoCal) | Residential-focused, limited commercial organic processing, no tech platform |
| GFL Environmental | National (Canadian) | Aggressive M&A but poor integration, inconsistent service, no local processing |
| Competitor | Type | Key Weakness |
|---|---|---|
| Doing nothing (landfill) | Status quo | SB 1383 fines up to $500/day per violation, LEAs actively enforcing since 2024 |
| In-house composting | DIY | Expensive, requires space + permits + staff, doesn't scale, no compliance documentation |
| CommanderAI | Startup | Software-only, no actual processing, no trucks, no bins — just a dashboard |
| Advantage | Detail |
|---|---|
| Local processing | Vernon facility, 3.5 miles from DTLA — competitors long-haul 100+ miles |
| Per-pound pricing | Transparent, no hidden fees — competitors use opaque flat rates |
| Data layer | Real-time waste tracking, diversion reporting, contamination metrics |
| 99% diversion rate | Industry average is ~30% — Dyrt processes locally, not landfilling |
| Clean bin swap | Fresh bins every pickup — competitors leave dirty bins that smell |
| No long-term contracts | Month-to-month available — competitors lock you in for 3-5 years |
| Compliance documentation | Automated SB 1383 reporting for LEA audits |
When Republic/WM comes up early: "Great companies for general waste. For organics specifically, the question is: where does it actually go? Most national haulers truck it 100+ miles to a regional facility. We process locally in Vernon — 3.5 miles from downtown. That matters for cost, carbon footprint, and actual diversion rates."
When prospect says 'we already have a hauler': "Most of our customers kept their hauler for trash and recycling. We handle organics specifically — it's a different operation. The free audit usually shows 30-40% cost savings on the organic stream alone."
When price is the objection: "We price per pound, so you only pay for what you generate. Most haulers charge a flat monthly fee whether your bins are full or empty. Our customers typically save 20-35% once they see the per-pound math."
Guides collaborative design exploration before implementation: explores context, asks clarifying questions, proposes approaches, and writes a design doc for user approval.
Creates structured, bite-sized implementation plans from specs or requirements before writing code. Useful for breaking down multi-step tasks into testable steps with file structure and task boundaries.
Implements work from a spec or tickets using TDD at agreed seams, with regular typechecking and test runs, followed by code review.
npx claudepluginhub dyrt-labs/knowledge-work-plugins --plugin sales