From gavel
Writes standardized bug reports when an automated test confirms a real product defect. Use only after gavel-heal or gavel-analyze classifies APP BUG — not for flaky, env, or test-side failures.
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/gavel:gavel-bugThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
Standardized bug reporting from test failures.
Standardized bug reporting from test failures.
Invoke when ALL are true:
Do NOT use for: test-side problems, missing docs, speculative issues.
[TICKET-ID]: <general title describing root cause, not the scenario>
=================================================================================
Issue Tracker: <URL or "Not yet filed">
Repo: <repository name>
Severity: Low | Medium | High | Critical
Found by: Automated test (<path-to-spec>)
Description
-----------
<2-4 sentences explaining the bug. State the contract violated.>
Steps to Reproduce
------------------
1. <precondition>
2. <action>
3. <observation>
Observed Result
---------------
<exact behavior, status codes, response bodies>
Expected Result
---------------
<what should happen per the contract>
Test Failure Location
---------------------
<relative spec path>:<line>
Backend Code Location
---------------------
**Primary: File [function_name](file:///path/to/file#L<start>-L<end>)**
<2-4 sentences explaining WHY this code is the culprit.>
Fix Recommendation
------------------
<what the dev should change. Don't prescribe exact code unless trivial.>
Workaround
----------
<what users/QA can do until fixed, or "None currently available".>
npx claudepluginhub dsolisp/gavel --plugin gavelRoutes gstack requests to the correct skill (planning, review, QA, shipping, debugging, docs, security, design). Invokes when user types /gstack or asks which skill to use.
Provides UI/UX design intelligence with 50+ styles, 161 color palettes, 57 font pairings, 99 UX guidelines, and 25 chart types across 10 stacks. Use for designing pages, components, or reviewing visual quality.