dotnet-csharp

Modern C# (C# 14 / .NET 10)

Core Principles

1. Use the newest stable features — C# 14 is the target. Prefer language-level constructs over library workarounds.
2. Readability over cleverness — Pattern matching and expression-bodied members improve readability when used appropriately; deeply nested patterns do not.
3. Value types where possible — Prefer record struct, Span<T>, and stack allocation to reduce GC pressure.
4. Immutability by default — Use record, readonly, init, and required to make illegal states unrepresentable.

Patterns

Well-Known Features Quick Reference

Feature	Usage	Example
Primary constructors	DI injection, eliminate field assignments	public class OrderService(IOrderRepo repo, TimeProvider clock) { }
Collection expressions	[] for all collection types + spread	List<string> names = ["Alice", "Bob"]; / int[] all = [..a, ..b, 99];
Records	DTOs, value objects, immutable data	public record CreateOrderRequest(string CustomerId, List<OrderItem> Items);
readonly record struct	Small stack-allocated value types	public readonly record struct Money(decimal Amount, string Currency);
Pattern matching	Switch expressions, list/property patterns	order switch { { Total: > 1000 } => "Premium", _ => "Standard" };
List patterns	Deconstruct arrays/lists	items switch { [] => "Empty", [var x] => $"One: {x}", [var f, .., var l] => $"{f}..{l}" };
Span<T>	Zero-allocation slicing	ReadOnlySpan<char> trimmed = input.Trim(); int.TryParse(trimmed[4..], out id);
Raw string literals	Multi-line SQL, JSON, XML	var sql = """ SELECT ... """; / interpolated: $$""" {"id": "{{id}}"} """;
required members	Enforce initialization	public required string ConnectionString { get; init; }
is pattern + extraction	Null/type/property check	if (result is { IsSuccess: true, Value: var order }) { ... }

The field Keyword (C# 14)

Access the auto-generated backing field in property accessors without declaring it manually.

// GOOD — field keyword for validation in auto-property
public class Product
{
    public string Name
    {
        get => field;
        set => field = value?.Trim() ?? throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(value));
    }

    public decimal Price
    {
        get => field;
        set => field = value >= 0 ? value : throw new ArgumentOutOfRangeException(nameof(value));
    }
}

Lazy Initialization with field

public class ProductCatalog
{
    // Lazy-load on first access — no manual Lazy<T> or backing field
    public IReadOnlyList<Product> Products
    {
        get => field ??= LoadProducts();
    }

    private static List<Product> LoadProducts() => /* expensive load */;
}

Change Notification with field

// INotifyPropertyChanged without manual backing fields
public class OrderViewModel : INotifyPropertyChanged
{
    public event PropertyChangedEventHandler? PropertyChanged;

    public string CustomerName
    {
        get => field;
        set
        {
            if (field == value) return;
            field = value;
            PropertyChanged?.Invoke(this, new PropertyChangedEventArgs(nameof(CustomerName)));
        }
    } = "";

    public decimal Total
    {
        get => field;
        set
        {
            if (field == value) return;
            field = value;
            PropertyChanged?.Invoke(this, new PropertyChangedEventArgs(nameof(Total)));
        }
    }
}

Extension Members (C# 14)

Extension members replace static extension method classes with a cleaner syntax.

// GOOD — extension members (C# 14)
public extension OrderExtensions for Order
{
    public decimal TotalWithTax => Total * 1.2m;

    public bool IsHighValue => Total > 1000m;

    public string ToSummary() => $"Order #{Id}: {Total:C} ({Items.Count} items)";
}

Anti-patterns

Don't Use Obsolete Patterns When Modern Alternatives Exist

// BAD — manual backing field when field keyword works
private string _name;
public string Name
{
    get => _name;
    set => _name = value ?? throw new ArgumentNullException();
}

// BAD — old-style collection initialization
var list = new List<int>() { 1, 2, 3 };

// BAD — Tuple instead of record for domain types
(string Name, decimal Price) product = ("Widget", 9.99m);
// GOOD — record
public record Product(string Name, decimal Price);

Don't Over-pattern-match

// BAD — deeply nested pattern that's hard to read
if (order is { Customer: { Address: { Country: { Code: "US" } } } })

// GOOD — extract to a clear method or use sequential checks
if (order.Customer.Address.Country.Code == "US")

Don't Use var When the Type Is Not Obvious

// BAD — what type is this?
var result = Process(order);

// GOOD — explicit type when not obvious
Result<Order> result = Process(order);
// Also GOOD — var is fine when type is apparent
var orders = new List<Order>();

Decision Guide

Scenario	Recommendation
DTO / API contract	record (reference type)
Small value object (2-3 fields)	readonly record struct
Service with DI	Primary constructor
Collection creation	Collection expression []
Property with validation	field keyword
Multi-line string (SQL, JSON)	Raw string literal """
Slicing strings/arrays	Span<T>
Type checking + extraction	Pattern matching with is / switch
Enforced initialization	required modifier
Adding methods to external types	Extension members