This skill should be used when the user asks to "audit guard", "guard friction", "tune guard", "guard false positives", "fix guard blocking", or mentions branch guard configuration issues. Analyzes branch-guard.sh rules and proposes JSON config changes to reduce false positives.
Analyzes branch guard configuration to reduce false positives by proposing JSON config changes.
/plugin marketplace add https://www.claudepluginhub.com/api/plugins/data-wise-craft/marketplace.json/plugin install data-wise-craft@cpd-data-wise-craftThis skill inherits all available tools. When active, it can use any tool Claude has access to.
Analyze branch guard configuration to find false positives and reduce friction. Proposes changes to .claude/branch-guard.json — never modifies the guard script itself.
scripts/branch-guard.sh must exist (the guard script)Execute these steps in order.
Read the branch guard script and extract all protection rules:
# Extract protection patterns from branch-guard.sh
grep -n "BLOCKED\|blocked\|exit 2\|protection" scripts/branch-guard.sh
# Extract regex patterns used for detection
grep -n "grep.*-E\|=~\|pattern\|regex" scripts/branch-guard.sh
# Read existing config (if any)
cat .claude/branch-guard.json 2>/dev/null || echo "No config file found"
Present a summary:
┌───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ GUARD DISCOVERY │
├───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Script: scripts/branch-guard.sh (N lines) │
│ Config: .claude/branch-guard.json (found/not found) │
│ Branches: main (block-all), dev (smart), feature/* (none) │
│ │
│ Protection Rules Found: │
│ 1. [HIGH] Destructive git commands in PR body │
│ 2. [HIGH] Force push to protected branches │
│ 3. [MEDIUM] New code files on dev │
│ 4. [LOW] Config file modifications on dev │
│ ... (N total rules) │
└───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
For each rule, identify scenarios where it produces false positives:
| Rule | Intended Block | False Positive Scenario |
|---|---|---|
| Destructive git in PR body | Actual destructive commands | Documentation mentioning commands |
| Force push detection | Force push to main/dev | Rebased feature branch push |
| New code files on dev | Feature code on dev | Config/build files |
| File extension detection | Source code files | Generated/template files |
Generate test scenarios and report which ones trigger incorrectly:
# Test 1: PR body with documentation about git commands
# Should NOT trigger — it's documentation, not actual commands
echo "Testing: PR body with 'git reset' in docs context..."
# Test 2: Force push on feature branch
# Should NOT trigger — feature branches allow force push
echo "Testing: Force push on feature/my-feature..."
# Test 3: Config file write on dev
# Should allow — .json/.yaml are config, not code
echo "Testing: Write .claude/branch-guard.json on dev..."
# Test 4: Markdown file on dev
# Should allow — .md files are documentation
echo "Testing: Write docs/guide.md on dev..."
Output a friction report with specific recommendations:
┌───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ GUARD FRICTION REPORT │
├───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ │
│ Rules Analyzed: N │
│ False Positives Found: M │
│ │
│ Recommendation 1: Relax PR body scanning │
│ Issue: Guard flags PR bodies containing destructive │
│ command strings even when used as documentation │
│ Fix: Add context awareness — only flag if command is in │
│ a bash/shell code block, not prose │
│ Config change: │
│ "pr_body_scan": "code_blocks_only" │
│ │
│ Recommendation 2: Allow force-push on feature/* │
│ Issue: Guard blocks force-push after rebase on feature │
│ branches │
│ Fix: Only block force-push on main and dev │
│ Config change: │
│ "force_push_allow": ["feature/*", "fix/*"] │
│ │
│ Recommendation 3: Expand allowed file types on dev │
│ Issue: Guard blocks config files (.json, .yaml) on dev │
│ Fix: Add config extensions to allowed list │
│ Config change: │
│ "dev_allowed_extensions": [".md", ".json", ".yaml", │
│ ".yml", ".toml", ".txt"] │
│ │
└───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Present proposed JSON config changes:
{
"version": 2,
"branches": {
"main": { "protection": "block-all" },
"dev": {
"protection": "smart",
"allowed_extensions": [".md", ".json", ".yaml", ".yml", ".toml", ".txt"],
"pr_body_scan": "code_blocks_only"
},
"feature/*": {
"protection": "none",
"allow_force_push": true
}
}
}
Ask user to confirm before writing to .claude/branch-guard.json.
IMPORTANT: Never modify scripts/branch-guard.sh. Only propose changes to the JSON config file.
Use craft box-drawing format throughout. Each step shows progress:
[1/5] Discovery ................ DONE (N rules found)
[2/5] Friction analysis ........ DONE (M false positives)
[3/5] Test harness ............. DONE (P/Q tests passed)
[4/5] Report ................... SHOWN
[5/5] Apply .................... WAITING (user confirmation)
| Error | Recovery |
|---|---|
| No guard script found | Report error, suggest installing guard |
| No false positives found | Report clean audit, no changes needed |
| Config write fails | Show JSON for manual copy |
| Tests inconclusive | Show raw test output for review |
scripts/branch-guard.sh — The guard script (read-only for this skill).claude/branch-guard.json — Per-project config (this skill's output)/craft:git:unprotect — Session-scoped bypass (temporary)/craft:git:protect — Re-enable protectionActivates when the user asks about AI prompts, needs prompt templates, wants to search for prompts, or mentions prompts.chat. Use for discovering, retrieving, and improving prompts.
Search, retrieve, and install Agent Skills from the prompts.chat registry using MCP tools. Use when the user asks to find skills, browse skill catalogs, install a skill for Claude, or extend Claude's capabilities with reusable AI agent components.
Creating algorithmic art using p5.js with seeded randomness and interactive parameter exploration. Use this when users request creating art using code, generative art, algorithmic art, flow fields, or particle systems. Create original algorithmic art rather than copying existing artists' work to avoid copyright violations.