axiom-verify

Axiom Lean 4 Proof Verification

Axiom provides cloud-based Lean 4 proof verification through the Axle API. It compiles and checks Lean code against a full Mathlib environment without requiring a local Lean installation -- verification results come back in seconds rather than the minutes it takes to build locally.

Before First Use

Check these once per session before running any Axle commands:

1. API key: Run echo $AXLE_API_KEY. If empty, the user needs to get a key from axle.axiommath.ai/app/console and set it: export AXLE_API_KEY=<key>.
2. CLI installed: Run axle --version. If not found, install with pip install axiom-axle.
3. Lean environment: Check for a lean-toolchain file in the project root to detect the Lean version. If present, use its version (e.g., leanprover/lean4:v4.28.0 becomes lean-4.28.0). If absent, default to lean-4.28.0.

Reference Files

Read these as needed based on the task:

1. references/axiom-configuration.md -- Setup, authentication, environment selection. Read this first if the user hasn't configured Axiom yet.
2. references/axiom-api-reference.md -- All 14 API endpoints with parameters and response formats. Read when you need exact parameter names or response fields.
3. references/axiom-cli-reference.md -- CLI commands and options. Read for exact flags and usage details when working with local files.
4. references/axiom-best-practices.md -- Workflow guidance, result interpretation, pitfalls, and tips. Read when planning a multi-step workflow or hitting unexpected behavior.
5. references/agents/verify-fix-agent.md -- Agent for autonomous check → repair → verify workflow.
6. references/agents/clean-analyze-agent.md -- Agent for autonomous normalize → extract → clean → check workflow.

Workflow

Step 1: Select the Right Tool

Match the user's intent to the appropriate endpoint:

User wants to...	Endpoint	Notes
Verify a proof is correct	verify_proof	Checks candidate proof against a formal statement
Check if code compiles	check	Quick syntax and type checking
Understand proof structure	extract_theorems	Splits file into self-contained theorem units
Rename declarations	rename	Automatic reference updates throughout
Convert theorem/lemma	theorem2lemma	Switch between theorem and lemma keywords
Stub out proofs	theorem2sorry	Replace proofs with sorry for scaffolding
Combine files	merge	Intelligent deduplication across files
Remove no-op tactics/haves	simplify_theorems	Tactics that don't change proof state, unused haves
Remove post-completion tactics	repair_proofs	Tactics after proof is done, replace sorry, fix unsafe tactics
Extract have statements	have2lemma	Promote inline have to standalone lemma
Stub have bodies	have2sorry	Replace have bodies with sorry
Extract sorry placeholders	sorry2lemma	Turn sorry into lemma stubs
Test if statement is false	disprove	Attempts counterexample via Plausible
Standardize formatting	normalize	Clean up sections, namespaces, comments

When unsure which tool to use:

• Start with check to see if the code compiles at all
• Use extract_theorems to understand what's in the file
• Use normalize first if the file uses section/namespace blocks (these can cause issues with other tools)

Step 2: Execute

When working with local files, prefer the axle CLI -- it reads files directly from disk, has simpler syntax, and can write output to files with -o. The CLI reads AXLE_API_KEY from the environment automatically. Note: CLI commands use hyphens (e.g., verify-proof), while the HTTP API uses underscores (verify_proof). All code is sent to axle.axiommath.ai for compilation against a full Mathlib environment -- the CLI is not local verification.

When constructing Lean code dynamically (generating content in scripts, CI/CD pipelines, or building code strings programmatically), use the HTTP API via curl or the Python client (pip install axiom-axle). The API accepts content as JSON strings, which is better suited for generated or in-memory code.

Check code compiles:

axle check file.lean --environment lean-4.28.0 --ignore-imports

Verify a proof:

axle verify-proof formal_statement.lean proof.lean \
  --environment lean-4.28.0 --ignore-imports

Repair broken proofs:

axle repair-proofs file.lean --environment lean-4.28.0 --ignore-imports \
  --repairs remove_extraneous_tactics,apply_terminal_tactics

Disprove a conjecture:

axle disprove file.lean --environment lean-4.28.0 --ignore-imports

Normalize a file (flatten sections/namespaces):

axle normalize file.lean -o normalized.lean --environment lean-4.28.0 --ignore-imports

Extract theorems:

axle extract-theorems file.lean --environment lean-4.28.0 --ignore-imports

Simplify theorems:

axle simplify-theorems file.lean --environment lean-4.28.0 --ignore-imports

Rename declarations:

axle rename file.lean --declarations '{"old_name": "new_name"}' \
  --environment lean-4.28.0 --ignore-imports

Stub proofs with sorry:

axle theorem2sorry file.lean --environment lean-4.28.0 --ignore-imports

Write transformation output to a file (works with normalize, repair-proofs, simplify-theorems, rename, etc.):

axle normalize file.lean -o output.lean -f --environment lean-4.28.0 --ignore-imports

API example (for dynamically constructed code):

curl -s -X POST https://axle.axiommath.ai/api/v1/check \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $AXLE_API_KEY" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d "$(jq -n \
    --arg content "$LEAN_CODE" \
    '{content: $content, environment: "lean-4.28.0", ignore_imports: true}')" \
  | jq '{okay, failed_declarations, lean_errors: .lean_messages.errors, tool_errors: .tool_messages.errors}'

For the full CLI command reference, see references/axiom-cli-reference.md. For the full API parameter reference for all 14 endpoints, see references/axiom-api-reference.md.

Step 3: Interpret Results

Every response includes lean_messages (Lean compiler output) and tool_messages (Axle diagnostics). Always check both -- transformation tools can "succeed" with zero tool_messages errors while lean_messages.errors reveals the code didn't compile.

Read references/axiom-best-practices.md for detailed result interpretation by endpoint type (check vs verify_proof vs transformation tools vs disprove), the user_error response format, and severity levels.

Critical: Always use --ignore-imports / "ignore_imports": true unless testing exact imports. Without it, import mismatches return user_error instead of the standard response.

Common Multi-Step Workflows

Verify and fix a proof: Launch a subagent following references/agents/verify-fix-agent.md, or execute the same workflow inline if subagents are unavailable. It runs check → repair → re-check → verify and returns a structured diagnosis.

Analyze and clean a file: Launch a subagent following references/agents/clean-analyze-agent.md, or execute the same workflow inline if subagents are unavailable. It runs normalize → extract → repair → simplify → check and returns a structural summary with cleaned output.

Scaffold a proof development:

1. Write formal statements
2. theorem2sorry -- stub out proofs with sorry (use names parameter to target specific theorems)
3. Fill in proofs incrementally
4. check after each proof to verify progress
5. sorry2lemma -- track remaining obligations (generates {name}.sorried lemma stubs inserted before each sorry'd theorem)
6. verify_proof for final verification

Test a conjecture:

1. disprove -- look for counterexamples first
2. If no counterexample found, attempt the proof
3. check incrementally as you build the proof
4. verify_proof when complete

Common Pitfalls

Read references/axiom-best-practices.md before submitting code. Key traps: custom attributes must be stripped, autoImplicit is off in Mathlib, name shadowing causes silent failures, sections/namespaces require normalize first, and transformation tools silently return unchanged content on any compilation error.