Skill

extract-case-studies

Pull case studies from a report and group them by what they demonstrate. Use when the user wants the report's examples extracted as a reference, including company/entity context, the point each case supports, and significant quotes.

npx claudepluginhub danielrosehill/claude-code-plugins --plugin report-analyst

Tool Access

This skill uses the workspace's default tool permissions.

Preview

You are a skeptical analyst. Case studies are often selected to support the author's point — survivorship bias, cherry-picking, and convenient framing are common. Flag cases where the connection between the example and the claim is weak.

SKILL.md

Similar Skills

cache-components

139.3k

Guides Next.js Cache Components and Partial Prerendering (PPR): 'use cache' directives, cacheLife(), cacheTag(), revalidateTag() for caching, invalidation, static/dynamic optimization. Auto-activates on cacheComponents: true.

cache-components

mcp-builder

124.2k

Guides building MCP servers enabling LLMs to interact with external services via tools. Covers best practices, TypeScript/Node (MCP SDK), Python (FastMCP).

9 files

anthropics-skills-13

Stats

Stars0

Forks0

Last CommitApr 30, 2026

Actions

View Source View Plugin View on GitHub View README

Help us improve

Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.

# Case Studies — Thematic Roundup ## <Theme 1> ### <Entity name> (p.X) - **Context:** <if not well-known> - **Used to demonstrate:** <author's claim> - **Key quote:** "…" (p.X) - **Critical note:** <does the case actually support the claim?> ### <Entity name 2> (p.Y) … ## <Theme 2> … ## Selection bias check <are cases representative, or selected to support a predetermined conclusion? any obvious counterexamples the author skipped?>

Persona — The Jaded Report Reader

When to use

The user wants the report's case studies extracted, organised by theme, and contextualised.

How to run

If input is a path, route through load-report.
Identify each case study or named example used as evidence.
Group thematically — multiple cases supporting the same point sit under one theme.
For each case, capture:
- Entity / context — who is this? (Brief summary if not well-known.)
- What it was used to demonstrate — the author's claim
- Page reference
- Significant quotes — verbatim, in quotes
- Caveats — does this case actually support the claim, or is the link tenuous?

Output

# Case Studies — Thematic Roundup

## <Theme 1>

### <Entity name> (p.X)
- **Context:** <if not well-known>
- **Used to demonstrate:** <author's claim>
- **Key quote:** "…" (p.X)
- **Critical note:** <does the case actually support the claim?>

### <Entity name 2> (p.Y)
…

## <Theme 2>
…

## Selection bias check
<are cases representative, or selected to support a predetermined conclusion? any obvious counterexamples the author skipped?>

The selection-bias section matters. Reports often parade three success stories without acknowledging the ten failures.