Triggers when the user is preparing for a sales meeting, needs a call briefing, or wants help structuring a conversation with a prospect or customer. Trigger phrases include "prep for my call with", "meeting with [company]", "what should I ask", "discovery questions", "agenda for", "call prep", "meeting prep", "demo prep", "negotiation prep", or "I have a meeting tomorrow with".
From sales-enablementnpx claudepluginhub cjf-iii/sales-enablement-pluginThis skill is limited to using the following tools:
Guides Next.js Cache Components and Partial Prerendering (PPR) with cacheComponents enabled. Implements 'use cache', cacheLife(), cacheTag(), revalidateTag(), static/dynamic optimization, and cache debugging.
Migrates code, prompts, and API calls from Claude Sonnet 4.0/4.5 or Opus 4.1 to Opus 4.5, updating model strings on Anthropic, AWS, GCP, Azure platforms.
Details PluginEval's skill quality evaluation: 3 layers (static, LLM judge), 10 dimensions, rubrics, formulas, anti-patterns, badges. Use to interpret scores, improve triggering, calibrate thresholds.
Activate this skill when:
Classify the meeting into one of six types (each has different prep requirements):
| Type | Goal | Prep Intensity | Key Output |
|---|---|---|---|
| Discovery | Understand buyer's world, identify pain, qualify opportunity | High | Question framework + research brief |
| Demo | Show relevant capabilities, advance to proposal | Medium-High | Demo script + objection prep |
| Negotiation | Align on terms, address commercial concerns | High | BATNA analysis + concession plan |
| Close | Get verbal/written commitment, finalize terms | Medium | Mutual action plan + paperwork |
| Check-in | Maintain relationship, identify expansion opportunities | Low-Medium | Account health review + expansion plays |
| QBR | Review performance, justify continued investment, expand | High | Performance report + growth proposal |
data/memory/companies/ for the company profiledata/memory/contacts/ for all known contacts at this companydata/memory/deals/ for any active or past dealsdata/memory/wins/ and data/memory/losses/ for historical contextdata/memory/learnings/stage-progression.md for patterns relevant to this deal stageGenerate a 1-page call briefing using the template below, adapted for the meeting type.
Apply the relevant framework from the Meeting Type Adaptation section below.
After prep is complete:
data/memory/companies/data/memory/contacts/Share the agenda in advance. Send it 24 hours before the meeting. This signals professionalism and gives the buyer time to prepare (which makes the meeting more productive for you).
Start with their priorities, not yours. The first agenda item should be something the buyer cares about. "Understand your Q3 priorities" comes before "Walk through our platform."
Build in time for discovery, even in non-discovery meetings. Every meeting is an opportunity to learn something new. Reserve 20% of the time for open questions.
End with clear next steps. The last 5 minutes of every meeting should be: "Here's what we agreed to do, here's who's doing it, here's by when."
Keep it short. 4-6 bullet points. Not a detailed schedule — an agenda is a conversation map, not a script.
Discovery (45-60 min):
Demo (45-60 min):
Negotiation (30-45 min):
Close (30 min):
Check-in (30 min):
QBR (60 min):
Every meeting should be prepared with this structure:
These are open-ended questions designed to uncover information you don't have yet. They should feel natural, not interrogative.
Question design principles:
Examples by meeting type:
Discovery:
Demo:
Negotiation:
Tailored to THIS buyer, THIS meeting, THIS stage. Not your company's generic value prop — a specific articulation of what you can do for them.
Structure: "[Specific outcome] for [their company] by [specific mechanism], similar to what we did for [reference]."
Examples:
The question or statement that advances the deal to the next stage. Adapted to meeting type.
Discovery close: "Based on what you've shared, I think there's a strong fit. Would it make sense to schedule a demo with your broader team next week?"
Demo close: "You've seen how this addresses [pain 1] and [pain 2]. What would you need to see to put together a proposal?"
Negotiation close: "It sounds like we're aligned on the approach. If I can get [specific concession] approved, can we target signing by [date]?"
Close close: "Everything looks good. Shall we lock in the start date and get the contract to legal?"
When meeting with multiple people, map each stakeholder before the call:
| Name | Title | Role in Decision | Priority | Personality Type | Strategy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Name] | [Title] | [EB/Champion/Influencer/User/Blocker] | [What they care about most] | [Analytical/Driver/Expressive/Amiable] | [How to engage them] |
Economic Buyer (EB): Signs the check. Cares about ROI, risk, strategic alignment.
Champion: Wants you to win. Cares about their credibility and career advancement.
Influencer: Has an opinion that matters but doesn't decide. Often technical or operational.
User: Will use the product day-to-day. Cares about ease of use and impact on their workflow.
Blocker: Opposes the deal for political, budgetary, or operational reasons.
Analytical (data-driven, detail-oriented, skeptical):
Driver (results-oriented, fast-paced, impatient):
Expressive (big-picture, enthusiastic, relationship-oriented):
Amiable (collaborative, consensus-seeking, risk-averse):
After every call, record the following. This is the raw material for deal intelligence.
# Post-Call Debrief: [Company] — [Date]
## Meeting Details
- **Type:** [Discovery / Demo / Negotiation / Close / Check-in / QBR]
- **Attendees (them):** [Names and titles]
- **Attendees (us):** [Names]
- **Duration:** [X minutes]
## Key Takeaways (Top 3)
1. [Most important thing learned or decided]
2. [Second most important]
3. [Third most important]
## Discovery Intel
- **New pain points identified:** [List]
- **New stakeholders mentioned:** [Names, titles, roles]
- **Budget signals:** [Any new info about budget, approval, timing]
- **Competitive mentions:** [Any competitors discussed]
- **Decision process updates:** [Any new info about how/when they'll decide]
## Objections or Concerns Raised
- **Objection 1:** [What they said] — **Response:** [What we said] — **Resolved?** [Y/N]
- **Objection 2:** [What they said] — **Response:** [What we said] — **Resolved?** [Y/N]
## What Went Well
- [Specific moment or exchange that landed]
## What Could Have Gone Better
- [Specific moment or exchange that fell flat or was missed]
## Agreed Next Steps
1. **[Action]** — Owner: [who] — By: [date]
2. **[Action]** — Owner: [who] — By: [date]
3. **[Action]** — Owner: [who] — By: [date]
## MEDDIC Impact
- [Which dimensions were strengthened or weakened by this meeting?]
- [Updated score for any dimension that changed]
## Follow-Up Required
- [ ] Send [document/email/resource] to [contact] by [date]
- [ ] Schedule [next meeting type] with [attendees] by [date]
- [ ] Update [CRM/deal file/contact file] with new information
- [ ] Prepare [deliverable] for next meeting
Objective: Understand the buyer's world deeply enough to determine mutual fit and identify their core pain. This is NOT a demo. Resist the urge to present.
The 80/20 Rule: The buyer should talk 80% of the time. You should talk 20%. If you're talking more, you're presenting, not discovering.
Question Layering Technique:
Most reps stop at Level 2. Great reps get to Level 4 and 5. That depth is what separates qualification from disqualification.
Discovery danger signs (consider disqualifying):
Objective: Show the buyer that your solution solves THEIR specific problem, not everything your product can do.
The #1 Demo Mistake: Showing every feature. Nobody cares about every feature. They care about the 3 features that solve their 3 problems.
Demo Prep Formula:
Demo environment checklist:
Objective: Reach mutually acceptable terms while protecting your value and the buyer's trust.
BATNA Analysis (Best Alternative to Negotiated Agreement):
| Element | Ours | Theirs |
|---|---|---|
| Best alternative | [What do we do if this deal doesn't close?] | [What do they do if they don't buy from us?] |
| Walk-away point | [Minimum acceptable terms] | [Maximum they can stretch to] |
| Ideal outcome | [Best case] | [Best case for them] |
| Leverage | [Why they need us more than we need them, or vice versa] | [Same, their perspective] |
Concession Planning:
| Concession | Value to Them | Cost to Us | When to Offer | What to Get in Return |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [e.g., 10% discount] | [High] | [Medium] | [Only if deal > $300K and 2+ year term] | [Longer commitment, case study rights, reference] |
| [e.g., Phased payment] | [Medium] | [Low] | [If cash flow is a genuine concern] | [Full contract value, auto-renewal] |
| [e.g., Free pilot] | [High] | [High] | [Only for strategic accounts] | [Defined success criteria that lead to full contract] |
Negotiation rules:
Objective: Confirm everything is aligned and execute the paperwork.
Pre-close checklist:
Close meeting danger signs:
After each call prep session:
data/memory/learnings/stage-progression.md if the meeting changes the deal stagedata/memory/learnings/objection-patterns.md# CALL BRIEFING: Meridian Media Group — Discovery
**Date:** March 20, 2026 | **Time:** 2:00 PM ET | **Duration:** 45 min
**Meeting Link:** [Zoom link]
## Attendees
| Name | Title | Role | What They Care About |
|---|---|---|---|
| Marcus Lee | Dir. of Digital | Champion (likely) | Proving digital can scale revenue |
| Jennifer Walsh | VP, Ad Operations | Influencer | Operational efficiency, platform reliability |
## Company Snapshot
- **Industry:** Digital media / publishing
- **Revenue:** $180M (est.) | **Employees:** ~600
- **Ad Revenue Split:** 62% linear / 38% digital (digital growing 22% YoY)
- **Recent News:** Hired new CTO from Vox Media (Jan 2026). Signals tech investment push.
- **Their Competitors:** Condé Nast Digital, BDG, Dotdash Meredith
## Meeting Objective
Understand Meridian's digital advertising infrastructure, identify pain points
around programmatic monetization and data capabilities, and determine if there's
a qualified opportunity worth pursuing.
## 3 Discovery Questions
1. "Marcus, you've been scaling the digital side rapidly — 38% of revenue
and growing. What's the biggest bottleneck to getting that to 50%?"
2. "Jennifer, when an advertiser asks for audience-based targeting beyond
basic demographics, how does your team handle that today? Where does
the process break down?"
3. "If I looked at your average programmatic CPM over the last 12 months,
what direction is it trending — and what do you think is driving that?"
## 2 Value Propositions
1. "We can help Meridian close the data gap with competitors like Dotdash
Meredith by building a first-party audience platform that extends your
targetable audience from ~40% to 85%+ — without any cookie dependency."
2. "Our contextual + behavioral targeting fusion typically drives 25-35%
CPA improvement for publishers your size, which translates directly
to higher yield per impression and a stronger pitch to advertisers."
## 1 Close Question
"Based on what you're sharing, it sounds like there might be a strong fit.
Would it make sense to schedule a deeper technical discussion with your
data team and our solutions engineers?"
## Watch For
- **Budget authority:** Does Marcus or Jennifer control budget, or is that the CMO?
- **Timeline signals:** Is there a forcing function (upfront season, contract expiration)?
- **Competitive landscape:** Are they evaluating other solutions? Who?
- **Champion test:** Is Marcus willing to make internal introductions?
## Do NOT
- Demo the product (this is discovery, not demo)
- Talk for more than 30 seconds without asking a question
- Assume you know their problems — let them tell you