ylj-topic-selection

Topic Selection & Fit (ylj-topic-selection)

YLJ is the generalist flagship of American legal scholarship — read across the whole discipline by academics, judges, and practitioners. A topic earns a slot only if its claim matters beyond a single doctrinal niche. This skill screens the idea before you invest in a full draft; it does not yet build the claim (ylj-thesis-and-contribution) or prove novelty (ylj-preemption-check).

When to trigger

• You have an idea and want to know if YLJ is the right home (vs. a specialty review)
• Several candidate angles exist and you must pick the one with the widest reach
• Deciding Article vs. Essay vs. Feature vs. (for Yale students) Note/Comment
• A timely development (new statute, circuit split, landmark opinion) might justify the Forum

Fit test (a topic must clear all four)

1. Generalist stakes. A constitutional-law professor and a commercial-litigation partner can both say in one sentence why the claim matters. If only specialists in your subfield care, target a specialty review instead.
2. A claim, not a survey. YLJ wants an argument that changes how readers think about a doctrine, theory, or institution — not a doctrinal literature review or a casenote.
3. Headroom for novelty. A first scan (Westlaw secondary sources, SSRN, HeinOnline) suggests the space is not already occupied. Confirm later with ylj-preemption-check.
4. Right scale for a track. Big original theory → Article; sharp, contained intervention → Essay; timely reaction to a development or a response to a YLJ piece → Forum.

Generalist-significance ladder (push the topic up a rung)

Rung	Example framing	Verdict
Doctrinal fix in one circuit	"The Ninth Circuit misreads § X"	Specialty review, not YLJ
Doctrine-wide problem	"Courts across circuits misframe X"	Borderline — needs a theory
Doctrine ↔ theory	"X reveals a flaw in how we think about Y"	YLJ Essay candidate
New framework for an institution	"A new account of how Y should work"	YLJ Article candidate

Track sizing

• Article — original, ambitious scholarship; encouraged < 25,000 words incl. footnotes (~50 Journal pages) (检索于 2026-06；以官网为准).
• Essay — a pointed contribution; encouraged < 15,000 words incl. footnotes (~30 pages).
• Feature — curated set / symposium; coordinate with editors via ylj-placement-strategy.
• Note / Comment — Yale Law students only; route to ylj-student-editor-review for the Notes Development process and the first-time word caps.
• Forum — short, timely online piece, encouraged < 10,000 words incl. footnotes (~20 pages).

Checklist

• One-sentence statement of why a generalist reader cares
• The idea is a claim that changes a reader's mind, not a summary
• Quick scan suggests novelty headroom (formal check deferred to preemption)
• Timeliness assessed — is this an Article (durable) or a Forum (time-sensitive)?
• Track chosen and its encouraged length is realistic for the idea

Anti-patterns

• Pitching a casenote, doctrinal survey, or student-seminar paper as a generalist Article
• Choosing a topic so timely it will be stale by the print cycle (that is a Forum piece)
• Picking a niche only specialists value, then hoping prestige carries it
• Ignoring that an over-length manuscript weighs against acceptance regardless of quality

Output format

【Topic】one line
【Generalist stakes】who outside the subfield cares, and why
【Track】Article / Essay / Feature / Note / Comment / Forum (length realistic? Y/N)
【Novelty headroom】initial read (formal check pending)
【Next】ylj-thesis-and-contribution to sharpen the claim

Supplementary resources

• ../../resources/exemplars/library.md — landmark YLJ pieces by type, for calibrating ambition
• ../../resources/official-source-map.md — official YLJ track/length facts