From sociological-methods-and-research-skills
Screens project ideas for fit with Sociological Methods & Research journal's scope — genuine methodological contribution vs. application. Use when deciding if a paper belongs in SMR.
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/sociological-methods-and-research-skills:smr-topic-selectionThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
Use this first. SMR's single hardest gate is the difference between **a paper about a method** and
Use this first. SMR's single hardest gate is the difference between a paper about a method and a paper that uses a method. Most desk rejections at this venue are scope failures: a competent applied analysis with no methodological payoff for other researchers.
A submission must clearly be one (or more) of these — name yours before drafting:
If you cannot place the paper in one mode in a single sentence, it is not yet an SMR paper.
Ask: could this finding appear in a substantive sociology journal (ASR/AJS) instead? If the contribution is the substantive result and the method is the vehicle, send it there. SMR wants the method to be the result and the substantive case to be the illustration. Diagnostic questions:
| Project shape | SMR verdict | Why |
|---|---|---|
| New estimator/diagnostic with derivation + simulation + illustration | In scope | Canonical "develop" paper |
| Monte Carlo evaluation of a widely-used method's failure modes | In scope | Canonical "evaluate" paper |
| Critique exposing a misused assumption + corrected procedure | In scope | Canonical "assess" paper |
| Strong substantive finding using a standard method | Out of scope | Belongs in ASR/AJS |
| New method with no real-data illustration | Repair first | SMR expects substantive relevance |
| Software/package note with no methodological novelty | Out of scope (or a software journal) | No method contribution |
[SMR fit] in scope / repair first / out of scope
[Contribution mode] develop / evaluate / critically assess
[Problem solved vs. existing methods] <one sentence>
[Application-test result] pass / fail (where it leaks to a substantive finding)
[Next SMR skill] smr-method-contribution
npx claudepluginhub brycewang-stanford/awesome-journal-skills --plugin sociological-methods-and-research-skillsGuides evaluating whether a research project fits Social Forces journal's criteria for scope, theoretical grounding, and methodological rigor.
Screens sociology projects for fit with the American Sociological Review (ASR) and helps decide between a full Article or a Comment/Reply based on scope and significance.
Helps decide whether a sociology project fits the American Journal of Sociology (AJS) and how to frame it for theoretical ambition and general significance.