From progress-in-human-geography-skills
Drafts response letters and revision plans for PiHG review feedback, addressing coverage gaps, fairness, conceptual arguments, accessibility, and scope fit.
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/progress-in-human-geography-skills:proghg-revisionThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
- An editor/referee letter on the review or progress report arrived
PiHG revision asks cluster differently from empirical-paper asks. Triage every point into one bucket:
| Feedback type | Typical phrasing | Response move |
|---|---|---|
| Coverage gap | "you omit the X literature / author Y / the Z tradition" | almost always concede and integrate — place the missing work in the right framework cell; re-run saturation (proghg-literature-synthesis) and update the coverage account |
| Fairness / reflexivity | "this slights tradition Z / is partisan / over-cites the author" | steelman the slighted side; surface positionality; re-audit self-citation and tradition balance (proghg-comprehensiveness-and-balance) |
| Appraisal accuracy | "you mischaracterize work W" | correct precisely; reviewed authors often referee — fix exactly |
| Conceptual argument / structure | "this is an annotated bibliography / a neutral roundup" | strengthen or make explicit the spine and the position (proghg-organizing-framework); do not just reorder paragraphs |
| Accessibility | "a geographer outside the subfield can't follow Section 4" | add intuition, define jargon (proghg-writing-style) |
| Scope / strand / length | "too broad / wrong strand / overruns length" | negotiate with the editor (proghg-editor-strategy); rescope deliberately, within the strand envelope |
| Conceptual-not-empirical | "this reads like an empirical paper / has original cases" | remove original data/cases; reframe as critical synthesis (PiHG publishes no empirical results) |
| Transparency | "how did you decide what to include? from what standpoint?" | document/expand the coverage account + positionality (proghg-transparency-and-reproducibility) |
【Triage】each comment bucketed (coverage/fairness/appraisal/argument/accessibility/scope/conceptual/transparency)? Y/N
【Coverage gaps】conceded + integrated into framework cells; saturation + account re-run? Y/N
【Fairness】steelman + positionality shown in revised text; self-citation + tradition balance re-audited? Y/N
【Appraisal fixes】mischaracterizations corrected precisely? Y/N
【Argument asks】spine + position strengthened/made explicit (not reordered)? Y/N
【Scope/strand】fits the strand envelope; any empirical content removed if flagged? Y/N
【Letter】point-by-point, quote-then-respond, with locations? Y/N
【Next step】→ proghg-submission (re-submit the revised review)
npx claudepluginhub brycewang-stanford/awesome-journal-skills --plugin progress-in-human-geography-skillsDrafts point-by-point response and revision plan for Annual Review of Sociology editorial/referee feedback, covering coverage gaps, balance, accuracy, framework, and accessibility.
Drafts point-by-point responses and revision plans for Annual Review of Economics referee feedback on coverage, balance, accuracy, and structure.
Drafts response letters and revision plans for JEL survey revise-and-resubmit decisions, addressing coverage gaps, balance complaints, framework/structure issues, and accessibility.