From population-and-development-review-skills
Polishes PDR (Population and Development Review) manuscripts with lucid, essayistic prose, APA references, and length norms for a broad demography-development audience. Tightens prose and format without inventing content.
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/population-and-development-review-skills:popdevr-writing-styleThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
A PDR paper must be readable by an economist, an environmental scholar, and a policy reader as well as a
A PDR paper must be readable by an economist, an environmental scholar, and a policy reader as well as a demographer, and it should carry the lucid, essayistic register PDR is known for — argument-driven, not just results-reporting. This skill is about reaching a broad readership and respecting the format — not about generating claims.
popdevr-submission).popdevr-literature-positioning).PDR, the Population Council's quarterly published by Wiley, reads as a PDR paper when the prose names a population process, its development meaning, and the quantity that links them. Two illustrative rewrites (language invented to show the move):
| Drafted as a bare estimate | Rewritten as a population–development claim |
|---|---|
| "Schooling is associated with lower fertility (−0.4 births)." | "A one-level rise in female schooling lowers completed fertility by ~0.4 births, enough to bring this cohort below replacement and open a two-decade demographic-dividend window (illustrative)." |
| "Urbanization correlates with emissions." | "Rural-to-urban migration raises per-capita emissions in the short run but, by accelerating the fertility transition, lowers projected population-driven emissions by mid-century (illustrative)." |
The left column could appear in any applied journal; the right column states the population quantity, its development consequence, and the time horizon a PDR reader expects.
【Contribution + development stakes stated by end of intro?】[Y/N]
【Reads across fields?】jargon defined / acronyms + data sources spelled? [Y/N]
【Abstract + keywords】present, within limits (待核实)? [Y/N]
【Word count】Article ~8,000–10,000 / Note short — within norm? [Y/N]
【House conventions + anonymized】APA-style (at revision) + Free Format + no self-ID refs? [Y/N]
【Next】popdevr-transparency-and-data
../../resources/official-source-map.md — length norms, abstract/keywords, Free Format, house style, double-anonymized reviewnpx claudepluginhub brycewang-stanford/awesome-journal-skills --plugin population-and-development-review-skillsDrafts and polishes Demography journal manuscripts to APA house style, word limits, and population-science readability.
Drafts and polishes American Political Science Review (APSR) manuscripts to reach the whole discipline, follow APSA Style Manual formatting, and meet word caps (Articles <11,000 words, Research Notes <7,000, abstract ≤150 words).
Drafts and polishes World Politics manuscripts to meet house style, word limits, and triple-blind review requirements. Tightens prose and format without inventing content.