From population-and-development-review-skills
Structures a point-by-point response letter for a Population and Development Review revise-and-resubmit, reconciling cross-field reviewer comments from demographers and development scholars.
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/population-and-development-review-skills:popdevr-rebuttalThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
A PDR **R&R is a real opportunity** — editors and referees thought the population-and-development
A PDR R&R is a real opportunity — editors and referees thought the population-and-development contribution is worth saving. But the editor decides, and the referees are cross-field (a demographer and a development/policy scholar may have reviewed the same paper from different angles), so the response letter must move every reviewer toward yes on both the population substance and its development meaning while keeping the editor confident the revision is convergent.
popdevr-transparency-and-data).For each reviewer comment:
> [Quoted reviewer comment]
Response: [What we did / why we respectfully disagree, on demographic or development grounds].
Change: [Section/page/table-figure number where the revision appears].
Open with a short summary of the main changes to the editor; group by reviewer; end each entry with the location of every change so the editor and referees can verify quickly.
【Editor decisive points】addressed first? [list]
【Coverage】every reviewer comment answered? [Y/N]
【Concede vs rebut】each tagged with demographic/development evidence + change location
【Cross-field conflicts】reconciled and explained to editor? [Y/N]
【Contribution protected】no dilution of the population-and-development claim? [Y/N]
【Anonymity + APA formatting + materials updated】[Y/N]
【Next】resubmit via ScholarOne
../../resources/official-source-map.md — review-process, double-anonymized, and revision policynpx claudepluginhub brycewang-stanford/awesome-journal-skills --plugin population-and-development-review-skillsStructures a response letter for a Demography (PAA/Duke University Press) revise-and-resubmit, addressing expert reviewers on demographic substance, rates, identification, and methods without alienating the editor.
Structures the response letter for an APSR revise-and-resubmit, converting reviewers while keeping the editor confident. Does not fabricate new results.
Builds a response-letter strategy for World Development decision letters (major/minor revision or reject-and-resubmit) under double-anonymized, multidisciplinary review.