From pmla-skills
Structures the revision of a PMLA essay and the response to readers' reports after a decision. Helps address every reader comment while protecting the argument and maintaining anonymity.
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/pmla-skills:pmla-revision-and-responseThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
PMLA essays receive **at least two, often three, substantive reports**, and the **Editorial Board**
PMLA essays receive at least two, often three, substantive reports, and the Editorial Board makes the final decision. A request to revise is a real opening — but it is not acceptance. The response must move every reader toward yes, strengthen the argument, and keep the manuscript blind.
pmla-submission). Keep MLA style intact
(see pmla-citation-and-style).For each reader comment:
> [Quoted reader comment]
Response: [What we revised / why we respectfully differ].
Change: [Section / page / passage where the revision appears].
Open with a short summary of the main changes for the editor and Board; group by reader; end each entry with the location of every change so the editor can verify quickly.
【Editor's decisive points】addressed first? [list]
【Coverage】every reader comment answered? [Y/N]
【Concede vs respond】each tagged with reason + change location
【Reader conflicts】reconciled and explained to the editor? [Y/N]
【Contribution protected】no dilution of the significant-problem claim? [Y/N]
【Anonymity + MLA style intact】[Y/N]
【Next】resubmit via ScholarOne
../../resources/official-source-map.md — reports per essay, Editorial Board decision, anonymity policynpx claudepluginhub brycewang-stanford/awesome-journal-skills --plugin pmla-skillsStructures revision of a Critical Inquiry essay and response letter to editors after a revise decision. Guides point-by-point replies and strengthens the argument without fabricating evidence.
Structures revision and response letters for American Historical Review editorial decisions, addressing multiple expert reports while protecting the manuscript's argument and anonymity.
Drafts, audits, or revises point-by-point reviewer response letters for Nature-family and other journal manuscript revisions.