jpe-workflow

JPE Workflow Router (jpe-workflow)

Overview

This is the router. It does not replace any specialized skill. It tells you which jpe- skill to use given where you are right now* in a Journal of Political Economy (JPE) submission.

Default assumption: unless the user says otherwise, treat the target as JPE proper (University of Chicago Press; lead editor Esteban Rossi-Hansberg). The same routing applies to the 2023-launched companion journals — JPE Microeconomics (lead editor John List) and JPE Macroeconomics (lead editor Greg Kaplan) — but those are narrower in scope; flag that routing choice in jpe-topic-selection. Note two JPE-specific gates that shape the whole pipeline: a non-refundable $250 / $125 submission fee with a 3-referee-reports waiver, and a conditional accept that triggers the JPE Data Editor verifying a DCAS package deposited to the JPE Dataverse.

The single organizing question behind every JPE skill: "What does economic theory predict here, and does the evidence bear it out?" A Chicago referee will read the paper as an economic argument, not a regression table. Internal consistency of that argument is scrutinized harder than at most journals.

When to trigger

• The user asks "what should I do next?" on a JPE-targeted paper
• A draft is handed over and the current bottleneck is unclear
• Work is bouncing between modeling, empirics, and writing with no clear order
• A JPE decision letter (reject / R&R) has arrived and the user needs to switch into response mode

Routing table

Current symptom	Next skill
Idea is a correlation in search of a question; no economic mechanism	jpe-topic-selection
Unsure whether the paper is "JPE-shaped" vs. a field journal	jpe-topic-selection
Lit review reads as a list; contribution not framed in Chicago author-date	jpe-literature-positioning
Empirics are OLS + controls; causal claim not defended	jpe-identification
Reduced-form result has no model / mechanism behind it	jpe-theory-model
Structural model present but identification of parameters is unclear	jpe-theory-model
Main result exists but rests on a single specification	jpe-robustness
Tables overloaded; figures not carrying the economic story	jpe-tables-figures
Prose is verbose / hedged / not in JPE's spare analytical voice	jpe-writing-style
Conditionally accepted; need a DCAS package for the JPE Data Editor / JPE Dataverse	jpe-replication-package
Want to anticipate the price-theory / GE objections a referee will raise	jpe-referee-strategy
Ready to submit; need Editorial Express preflight + $250/$125 fee/format check	jpe-submission
Received an R&R; need to draft the response letter	jpe-rebuttal

Default order

1. jpe-topic-selection — lock the economic question and the mechanism it tests
2. jpe-literature-positioning — situate the contribution in the economics literature (Chicago author-date)
3. jpe-identification — make the causal/empirical claim credible
4. jpe-theory-model — the model or mechanism that gives the result its economic meaning
5. jpe-robustness — kill the alternative explanations a referee will float
6. jpe-tables-figures — finalize main exhibits so each carries economic content
7. jpe-writing-style — tighten prose into JPE's analytical register (polish)
8. jpe-referee-strategy — pre-mortem the report you expect, patch holes
9. jpe-replication-package — assemble data/code to DCAS standard for the JPE Data Editor / JPE Dataverse
10. jpe-submission — Editorial Express preflight ($250/$125 fee, Chicago author-date format, single-blind)
11. jpe-rebuttal — after the R&R lands

jpe-writing-style is a late polish stage. Do not chase prose before the identification and the model are sound. jpe-theory-model and jpe-identification often iterate together — for JPE the model frequently disciplines the empirical specification, not the reverse.

Decision heuristics

• "I have a clean causal effect but no story for why" → jpe-theory-model (a bare effect is not a JPE paper)
• "I have a model but the empirics are an afterthought" → jpe-identification
• "My intro cites everyone but never says what economics learns" → jpe-literature-positioning
• "DID uses TWFE with staggered timing and I haven't addressed heterogeneity bias" → jpe-identification
• "All my evidence is one regression" → jpe-robustness
• "A referee will say this ignores general equilibrium / selection / incentives" → jpe-referee-strategy
• "Submitting tomorrow" → jpe-submission
• "Got three referee reports" → jpe-rebuttal

Differences vs. QJE / Econometrica / REStud stacks

JPE sits among the top-five but has a distinct house taste:

• JPE: premium on a tight economic mechanism and price-theoretic reasoning; reduced-form and structural both welcome, but the result must mean something for economic theory.
• QJE: prizes a striking, important question and a clean natural experiment; mechanism valued but identification often leads.
• Econometrica: methodological / theoretical novelty and formal rigor lead; pure applied work needs a method or theory contribution.
• REStud: technical depth with a younger-frontier slant; theory and structural empirics both core.

If the paper is methodological with no economic application, Econometrica may fit better. If it is an atheoretical policy evaluation, reconsider the framing in jpe-topic-selection before targeting JPE. And unlike its peers, JPE offers an in-house routing choice between the flagship and the JPE Micro / JPE Macro companions — use it deliberately.

Anti-patterns

• Do not skip jpe-theory-model and present a reduced-form correlation as a finished JPE paper — referees ask "what is the economics?"
• Do not let jpe-tables-figures polish exhibits while the identification is still contested
• Do not let jpe-rebuttal draft a response letter before the manuscript itself has been revised
• Do not treat jpe-submission as the first stop; preflight is worthless if the economic argument is not yet sound
• Do not defer reproducible code to post-accept; the JPE Data Editor verifies the package before publication